Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: mines act 1952 section 66 · Page 1 of about 372 results (0.070 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 05 2008

K.C. Palaniswamy and anr. Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-05-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 133A, 201(1), 201(1A), 276B, 278B, 278B(1), 279 and 279B; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 66; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; India Metalliferous Mines Regulations, 1926 - Regulation 3

Reported in : (2008)220CTR(Del)202; 152(2008)DLT620; 2008(106)DRJ319

file returns under Regulation 3 of the India Metalliferous Mines Regulations 1926 read with Section 66 of the Mines Act 1952 constituted a continuing offence. Answering the question in the negative it was held by the Supreme Court as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2000

Provident Fund Inspector Vs. Shama Beedi Factory and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-22-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 13, 14(2), 14A(1) and 14A(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 251, 255(1), 468 and 472; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 66 and 79; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD(Cri)369; 2000CriLJ3427

are relevant legal provisions.13. In State of Bihar v. Deokaran : 1973CriLJ347 , the question arose under the Mines Act (1952). Section 66 of the Mines Act, 1952 provides that any person omitting inter alia to furnish any return, notice etc.,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1960

The State of Orissa Vs. Iswar Das and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-11-1960

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulation, 1926 - Sections 3(1); Constitution of India - Article 20; General Caluses Act - Sections 24

Reported in : AIR1960Ori180; 1960CriLJ1355

not filed and a prosecution report was submitted by the Chief Inspector of Mines, Dhanbad, on 18-7-58 under Section 66 of the Indian Mines Act (Act 35 of 1952). The Additional District Magistrate Baripada took cognizance on 30-7-58 … by limitation; and (2) the Indian Minos Act, 1923, (Act IV of 1923), having been repealed by the Mines Act, 1952, (Act 35 of 1932), the Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulation which was framed under the 1923 Act was no

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 21 1985

Sisir Kumar Panda and ors. Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-21-1985

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 14 and 14(2); Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 - Sections 468, 472 and 473

Reported in : 1985(I)OLR535

C. was considering the question whether the offence for failure to furnish return under Section 66 of the Mines Act, 1952 is a continuing one or not. In paragraph 5 of the judgment, their Lordships discussed as to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 1987

Sugga Engineering Works (P.) Ltd. and Others (Cr. M. (M) Nos. 576 and ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-17-1987

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 16, 159, 160, 161, 162, 166, 167, 168, 200, 220, 234, 598, 610, 614A and 615; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468 and 472

Reported in : [1990]68CompCas625(Delhi); 1988(14)DRJ97b

the returns by the due date and they were prosecuted for an offence under section 66 of the Mines Act, 1952 Section 79 of that Act provided that no court could take cognizance of an offence under that Act unless

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 1987

Kuldip Singh and Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-17-1987

Subject : CriminalCompany

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 159; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468

Reported in : 34(1988)DLT11; 1988(14)DRJ97

the returns by the due date and they were prosecuted for an offence under Section 66 of the Mines Act 1952. Section 79 of that Act provided that no court could take cognizance of an offence under that Act unless

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 1972

State of Bihar Vs. Deokaran Nenshi and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-24-1972

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 66 and 79; Metalliferous Mines Regulations, 1926 - Regulation 3

Reported in : AIR1973SC908; 1973(0)BLJR741; 1973CriLJ347; [1973(26)FLR77]; (1972)2SCC890; [1973]1SCR1004

J.M. Shelat, J.1. Section 66 of the Mines Act, 1952 provides that any person omitting -inter alia to furnish any return, notice etc. in the prescribed form or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1987

C.B. Bhandari Vs. Provident Fund Inspector, Bangalore

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-25-1987

Subject : Company

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468, 468(2), 469 and 472; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provision Act - Sections 14(2); ;Employees' Provident Fund and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952 - Sections 19; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 66 and 79; Factory and Workshop Act, 1901 - Sections 10, 10(1), 135, and 146; ;Metropolis Management (Amendment) Act, 1852 - Sections 85; Bombay City Municipal Act, 1888 - Sections 390(1)

Reported in : [1988]64CompCas850(Kar); 1987(3)KarLJ244; (1988)IILLJ400Kant

accused relied on State of Bihar v. Deokaran Nenshi, : 1973CriLJ347 . It was a case under the Mines Act, 1952. Section 66 of the Mines Act, 1952, provides that any person omitting, inter alia, to furnish any return, notice, etc.,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2007

Webcity Infosys Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Companies (Delhi and Haryana)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-26-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468(2); Mines Act 1952 - Sections 66; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 150, 159, 160, 161, 162, 162(1), 205(8), 205A, 205A(1), 205A(2), 205A(8), 234 and 598; Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulations - Regulation 3

Reported in : 2007(98)DRJ710

the Supreme Court were considering Regulation 3 of the Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulations and Section 66 of the Mines Act 1952. In para 9 of the report it was opined as under:9. Reg. 3 read with Section 66 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 1992

Sivandhi Adityan Vs. Additional Registrar of Companies

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-18-1992

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 2(30), 5, 58A, 58A(1), (4), (5) and (6), 468(2), 477, 478, 539, 543, 545, 621, 625 and 633; Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 - Rules 3A and 11

Reported in : [1995]83CompCas616(Mad); 1994CriLJ1149

was filed in the Court of the Magistrate, Dhanbad, on April 12, 1961. (a) Section 66 of the Mines Act, 1952, provides that a person omitting to file any return, notice etc., in the prescribed form or manner or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial