Advanced Search Results
South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Customs and Central Ex ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-01-2006
Excise
Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2 and 82; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 5A(1) and 11A; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3(3); Factories Act - Sections 2; Central Excise Rules - Rules 9(1), 9(2), 52A, 53, 173B, 173C, 173G, 174 and 226
2006(200)ELT357(SC); JT2006(7)SC121; 2006(7)SCALE464; (2006)6SCC340
collieries. The Central Government declared this workshop as a mine under the provisions of Section 82 of the Mines Act, 1952 under certificate dated 1.5.1969. Section 2(J)(viii) of the Mines Act states that mine includes 'All workshop situated within … used solely for purposes connected with that mine or a number of mines under the same management.'Notification No. 63/95-CE dated 16.3.1995 was issued by the Central Government under Section 5A(1) of the Central Excises and Salt Act,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSouth Eastern Coalfield Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Nov-30-2000
Land Acquisition
(2001)(73)ECC249
the Central Government has declared the workshop as a mine under the provisions of Section 82 of the Mines Act, 1952 under certificate dated 1-5-1969; that as per Section 2 (j) (vii) of the Mines Act, mine includes "all … and penalty is stayed. The issue involved in this appeal is whether the exemption contained in Notification No. 63/95-CE., dated 16-3-1995 is available to the goods manufactured by them in their workshop, Korba.2. Shri P.R. Biswas, ld.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNeyveli Lignite Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-03-1991
Land Acquisition
(1992)(58)ELT76TriDel
contended in this show cause notice that according to Col. X of Clause (j) of Section 2 of Mines Act, 1952, a 'mine' includes premises or part of the premises thereof, in or adjacent to and belonging to a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Binoy Kumar Mishra Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-31-2017
Land Acquisition
Director of Mines Safety, Dhanbad (Jharkhand) (respondent No.2 herein) commenced inquiry/investigation on 06.01.1996 under Section 23(2) of the Mines Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). Based on the inquiry report dated 12.02.1996 submitted by respondent No.2, a … framing of such draft bye-laws becomes obligatory. Chapter IX provides for penalties and procedure and it covers Sections 63 to 81 of the Act. As the appellants herein along with other accused persons were charged for offences
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher
Supreme Court of India
Sep-15-2017
Right to Information
paid in accordance with the minor 13 mineral rules framed under the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'MMDR … 1961 SC 459, needs to be noted. The State of Orissa has enacted Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act, 1952 by which levy and demand was raised. The appellant challenged the enactment on the ground that legislation covers … 1927 Act. The Indian Forest Act, 1927 72 is a preconstitutional legislation enacted by Indian legislature as per Section 63 of Government of India Act, 1915. 1927 Act was the law enforced in the territory of India immediately
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCentral Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Jharkhand
Dec-24-2003
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226; Excise Act, 1994 - Sections 11A
[2004(1)JCR437(Jhr)]
Tribunal, Eastern Bench, has decided that the workshop in question was a 'mine' within the meaning of the Mines Act, 1952 and hence it could not be considered to be a factory within the meaning of Section 2(m) of … district of Hazaribagh. By that communication, dated 6.6.2003, the petitioner was informed that the exemption under Notification No. 63/95 CE dated 16.3.1995, was not available to the goods manufactured in the concerned workshop, since the concerned workshop
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.T. Rolling Mills Private Ltd. and anr. Vs. M.R. Meher and ors. Overruled
Mumbai
Nov-20-1959
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 7, 7A, 7B, 10, 10(1), 12, 12(5), 15, 25A, 25A(1), 25B, 25C, 25C(1), 25D, 25E, 25J, 25J(1), 25J(2) and 27C; Constitution of India - Article 226; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Plantation Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 2; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1953 - Sections 1(2); Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 98
AIR1963Bom146; (1962)64BOMLR645; (1962)IILLJ667Bom
Factories Act, 1948 (LXIII of 1948);or(ii) a mine as defined in Clause (j) of Section 2 of the Mines Act, 1952 (XXXV of 1952); or(iii) a plantation as defined in Clause (f) of Section 2 of the Plantation Labour
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD. Sarkar Alias Dipak Sarkar and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Patna
Feb-13-1997
Labour and Industrial
Contract Labour (Regulation Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 2(1), 23 and 24; Industrial Disputes Act
aforesaid. The definition of 'mine' as contained in Clause (j) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Mines Act, 1952 also includes all shafts, in or adjacent to and belonging to a mine, whether in the course of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Meghalaya Vs. All Dimasa Students Union Hasao District Co ...
Supreme Court of India
Jul-03-2019
Land Acquisition
empowers the District Magistrate to institute prosecution against any owner, agent or manager for any offence under the Mines Act, 1952. Section 75 is 121 as follows:- “75. Prosecution of owner, agent or manager.--No prosecution shall be instituted against any … Shillong, Meghalaya. Similarly, a O . P . S i n g h , Hills D r . 63 J o u r n a l authorities detailed article based on detailed investigation by Shri Pankaj Sharma
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Vs. Mb Power (madhya Pradesh) Limited
Supreme Court of India
Jan-08-2024
Electricity
question as to whether the phrase “any one of the Directors” as found in Section 76 of the Mines Act, 1952 could mean “only one of the Directors” or could it be construed to mean “every one of the … dated 19th January 2005, notified the Competitive Bidding Guidelines 3 (hereinafter referred to as “the Bidding Guidelines”) under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “the Electricity Act”). The objective of the said Bidding
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »