Advanced Search Results

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. A.K. JaIn and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 57 to 62, 73, 74 and 88; Constitution of India - Article 20

Reported in : AIR1958MP162; 1958CriLJ767

regulations and bye-laws made under the Indian Mines Act, 1923 and deemed to have been made under the Mines Act, 1952, read with Section 24 of the General Clauses Act, be quashed.Criminal Appeal No. 302 of 1956 and criminal … to make rules, regulations and bye-laws was conferred on the Central Government under Chapter VIII (Ss. 57 to 62) and disobedience or contraventions of the rules, regulations or bye-iaws so framed was made punishable under Sections 73

Chhotey Lal Gupta (Deceased by L.Rs.) Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contract

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 3(1); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1987All329

his agreement is in force. 19. The tenderers should in their own interest study the provisions of the Mines Act 1952 and rules made thereunder before tendring. He (they) shall be responsible for the provision of all facilities for … deemed to have failed in his contract and action as per clause 62 of the General Conditions of the contract shall be taken to determine … earnest money and security deposit made by him The plaintiff also served the defendant with a notice under Section 80, Civil P. C but to no effect. Hence the plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of the

The Continental Construction Company (incorporated Under the Indian Co ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Minor, Mineral Concessions Rules - Rule 5(1); Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 16, 30 and 39; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1)(L); Contract Act - Sections 70

Reported in : 2008(4)ALD95; 2008(4)ALT209

contractor does not come within the meaning of 'owner' of the quarry as defined under the provisions of Mines Act, 1952 and in which case he is under no obligation to pay seigniorge fee. A further contention has been … B. Seshasayana Reddy, J.1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 39 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 questioning the order dated 5.1.20.00 passed in O.P.No.14 of 1990 on

Builders Association of India and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. Union of India (U ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 - Sections 1(4), 3, 3(1), 7, 10, 12, 18, 18(1), 22, 23, 24, 24(1), 24(2) and 62; Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 14; Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Central Rules, 1998 - Rule 4; Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Rules, 1998 - Rules 4, 4(3), 5, 7 to 14; Delhi Building and Other Construction Workers' (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2002; Factories Act, 1948; Mines Act, 1952; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Haryana Rural Development Fund Act, 1983; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 39, 4

Reported in : 139(2007)DLT578

or other construction work to which the provisions of the Factories Act, 1948 (63 of 1948) or the Mines Act, 1952, (35 of 1952) apply;(e) 'building worker' means a person who is employed to do any skilled, semi-skilled or … 5.10 In 2002 the Delhi Rules were made by the central government in exercise of its powers under Section 62 of the BOCW Act. Notified on 10.1.2002, the Delhi Rules were made applicable to 'building and other construction

The India Cements Limited Represented by Its Managing Director Vs. Dir ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2001)3MLJ484

of the mines attached to the respective cement manufacturing units for the purpose of Section 76 of the Mines Act 1952. the brief facts leading to the writ petition may be summarized as follows.2. The petitioner namely The India … of the mine for the purpose of Section 76. When the said Section was amended by amendment Act 62 of 1959, all or any of the Directors of the company were held liable for prosecution under 'the

Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Vs. Mb Power (madhya Pradesh) Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

question as to whether the phrase “any one of the Directors” as found in Section 76 of the Mines Act, 1952 could mean “only one of the Directors” or could it be construed to mean “every one of the … be set aside. SUBMISSIONS OF THE RESPONDENTS22 Dr. A.M. Singhvi, learned Senior Counsel, per contra, submits that unlike Section 62 read with Sections 61 and 64 of the Electricity Act, under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, the

inder Sen Roy Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act 1948 - Sections 2, 6, 7, 92, 93, 94, 100, 100(1), 100(2), 101, 112 and 113

Reported in : (1975)ILLJ359Bom

occupier for the purpose of Chapter X. 11. In this connection, a reference to S. 76 of the Mines Act, 1952, as it stood before it was substituted by S. 41 of the amending Act No. 62 of 1959, … of any premises or building referred to in S. 93 is not an individual, the provisions of this section shall apply to such owner as they apply to occupiers of factories who are not individuals. We are

Parry and Co. Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Ii Additional Labour Court, ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1), 25L, 25N and 25N(7); Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; The Plantations Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 2

Reported in : 1997(3)CTC209

(63 of 1948); (ii) a mine as defined in clause of sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952); or (iii) a plantation as defined in clause (f) of Section 2 of the Plantations … with the requirements under Section 25-N of the said Act. (3) The management has not complied with Rule 62 of the Rules framed under the said Act. 4. The management field counters by way of reply to

S. Palaniappa Mudaliar Vs. Additional First Class Magistrate and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1958)2MLJ346

or is ordinarily so carried on, but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (XXXV of 1952), or a railway running shed.6. Then we have got Section 2(l) which defines a 'worker' … also prosecuted for violation of Rule 79 read with Section 61, for violation of Rule 80 read with Section 62, for violation of Rule 87 read with Section 83, for violation of Rules 34 and 36 read with

Steel Authority of India Ltd. and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. National Union Wa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and IndustrialConstitution

Acts : Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 3(1), 7, 8, 9, 10, 10(1) and (2), 12, 12(1), 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 21(4), 23, 24 and 25; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 10; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16, 23, 32, 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 43A and 226; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) (Amendment) Act, 1986; Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948 - Sections 5-A; Companies Act, 1956; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Coal Mines Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1948 - Sections 3-A; Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 5-A and B; Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956; Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961 - S

Reported in : AIR2001SC3527; [2001(91)FLR182]; (2002)1GLR792; JT2001(7)SC268; 2001LabIC3656; (2001)IILLJ1087SC; 2001(5)SCALE626; (2001)7SCC1; 2001(4)SCT1(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC228; 2001DGLS(soft)1084:2001(111)CLR349

to them in Clause (i), Clause (j) and Clause (c) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Mines Act 1952 (35 of 1952).74. It contains four parts. Under the first part, the head of any office or department