Advanced Search Results

The State of M.P. Vs. S.P. Mathur and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1970CriLJ922; 1970MPLJ171

alleged against them that the said contraventions constituted offences punishable under Section 72(c), A. and C. of the Mines Act, 1952.2. The prosecution case was that on 17-11-64 two loaded tubs were hauled up without attaching a drag or … P. and Berar v. Ganpat Dharmaji AIR 1943 Nag 243, the prosecution was for an offence punishable under Section 60 of the Factories Act, 1948. Section 75 of the Factories Act provided a similar rule of limitation of

Ramrao Laxmikant Shirkhedkar Vs. Accountant General, Maharashtra and a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 166, 226, 309, 311 and 311(2); Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1955 - Rules 1(1), 4(A), 5, 6, 8, 9, 13 and 17; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 - Rules 4, 8, 13, 15, 22 and 23; Essential Services Maintenance Ordinance, 1960 - Sections 5; Mineral Concession Rules, 1949 - Rules 26, 26(3), 57, 59 and 60; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Housing, Town Planning, Etc. Act, 1909; Madras Government Business Rules; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 3; Railway Service (Conduct) Rules; All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1954

Reported in : AIR1963Bom121; (1963)65BOMLR65; ILR1962Bom664; 1963MhLJ205

(iv) irrigation and electric power establishment. (v) mines as defined in Clause (j) of Section 2 of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952); (vi) Factories as defined in Clause (m) of Section 2 of the Factories Act, 1948 … of the appellant for grant of the mining lease would still stand. This is made clear by Rule 60 of the Rules, which provides that the order of the Central Government under Rule 59 and subject only

Binoy Kumar Mishra Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Director of Mines Safety, Dhanbad (Jharkhand) (respondent No.2 herein) commenced inquiry/investigation on 06.01.1996 under Section 23(2) of the Mines Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). Based on the inquiry report dated 12.02.1996 submitted by respondent No.2, a … Government is empowered to make Rules for all or any of the purposes mentioned in that Section. Under section 60 of the Act, the Central Government is empowered to make Regulations by dispensing with the publication under certain

The Deputy Director of Mines (Safety) Vs. P. Nagbhushanam and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1973CriLJ549

petitions are these: The accused in these cases were charged under Sections 70, 72-C(1)(b) and 73 of the Mines Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Regulations, 1961. The accused raised a preliminary point, that the … facts that have given rise to these petitions are these: The accused in these cases were charged under Sections 70, 72-C(1)(b) and 73 of the Mines Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Regulations, … and the occupier were accused of violating Section 42 punishable under Section 60(b)(i) by allowing workmen to work at hours otherwise than in accordance with

Kmml Titanium Complex Employees Union vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

with respect to the calculation of overtime wages, saying that it was counter to Section 60 of the Mines Act, 1952.2. The petitioners say that, however, in spite of this, andthough Ext.P3 Settlement records the dissent very clearly,

Union of India Vs. A.B. Shah and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 22, 72, 73 and 79; Coal Mines Regulations, 1957 - Regulation 100(1); Consumers Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1996SC3281; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)15; 1996(2)Crimes181(SC); JT1996(5)SC128; 1996(4)SCALE307; (1996)8SCC540; [1996]Supp2SCR620

Bench), this appeal is filed by special leave.2. The appellant preferred a complaint under Section 73 of the Mines Act 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') read with Regulation No. 100(1) of the Coal Mines Regulations 1957 (hereinafter … shall be as follows :For depth Gallery which Stooks shall not exceeding shall not exceed be less than 60 metres 5.4 metres 5 mts. x 5 mts. 90 metres 5.4 metres 6.6 mts. x 6.6 mts. 120

Ram Chander Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Mines & Minerals (Regulation & Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 22(3)

Reported in : 38(1989)DLT402; 1989(16)DRJ159

to get the land demarcated properly but without any success. The petitioner has made reference to provisions of Mines Act, 1952, to show that no proper inspection has been made. On the basis of inspection carried on September 3, … The petitioner has made reference to an order made on March 23, 1984, by the said Director under Section 22(3) of the Mines Act prohibiting employment of any labour in the said dangerous mines. It is alleged … order of cancellation of lease. If that is so, the period of 60 days provided in the show cause notice for enabling the petitioner to

Air India Ltd. Vs. the Appellate Authority Under Payment of Gratuity A ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 4(6), 7, 13 and 14; Payment of Gratuity (Maharashtra) Rules, 1972 - Rules 6 and 7(1); Constitution of India - Articles 41 and 226; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 9; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 60; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 10 and 12; Civil Services Pension Rules, 1972 - Rule 9(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 630

Reported in : 1999(1)BomCR426; [1999(81)FLR900]

sale in execution of any decree or order of any Court. The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 contains similar provisions. Section 10 of the said 1952 Act protects the provident fund from being assigned, charged … other than the workman by operation of law, nor shall any claim be set off against the same. Section 60 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 provides that the right to receive any payment of any benefit … of gratuity.-No gratuity payable to an employee employed in any establishment, factory, mine oilfield, plantations, port, railway company or shop exempted under section 5 shall

Air India Ltd. Vs. Appellate Authority Under the Payment of Gratuity A ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 4, 7, 13 and 14; Maharashtra Payment of Gratuity Rules, 1972 - Rule 7(1)

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR428; (1999)IILLJ93Bom

sale in execution of any decree or order of any Court. The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 contains similar provisions. Section 10 of the said 1952 Act protects the provident fund from being assigned, charged … other than the workman by operation of law, nor shall any claim be set off against the same. Section 60 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 provides that the right to receive any payment of any benefit … gratuity. No gratuity payable to an employee employed in any establishment, factory, mine, oil field, plantation, port, railway company or shop exempted under Section 5

State of U.P. and Others Etc. Vs. Pradhan Sangh Kshettra Samiti and Ot ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(3), 14, 39A, 40, 77, 154(1), 163, 166(3), 243, 300, 327 and 361; U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 11F and 96A; General Clauses Act, 1873 - Sections 3 (29),(60); U.P. Panchayat Raj (Amendment) Act, 1994 - Sections 5A, 6, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 24, 25, 32, 34 and 37; Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats Adhiniyam, 1961 - Sections 2; Representation of the People Act, 1950; U.P. Land Revenue Act; U.P. Village Courts Act, 1892; U.P. Village Panchayats Act, 1920; U.P. District Boards Act, 1922; U.P. Local Rates Act, 1914; Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act, 1952; Delimitation Act, 1950 - Sections 8 and 9

Reported in : AIR1995SC1512; JT1995(3)SC252; 1995(2)SCALE453; 1995Supp(2)SCC305; (1995)2UPLBEC874

challenged the method prescribed by the legislature for recovering the cess under the Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act, 1952 on the ground that it was unconstitutional. The majority of the Bench held that the. method is a … a view to hold elections to the panchyats. In particular the declaration of the gram panchyat areas under Section 11F and the establishment of the gram sabhas under Section 3 were made between 2nd and 5th August,