Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: mines act 1952 section 58 · Page 1 of about 816 results (0.089 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 18 1961

Mohan Lal Goenka and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-18-1961

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 17, 18, 18(1), 18(2), 46, 57, 58, 73 and 88; Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 24, 29 and 30; Creche Rules, 1946 - Rules 3, 3(1), 7 and 7(1); Constitution of India - Article 134(1)

Reported in : AIR1961SC1543; 1961CriLJ713; [1961(3)FLR326]; (1961)IILLJ404SC; [1962]2SCR36

standards of such rooms, and the nature and extent of the supervision to be provided therein." In the Mines Act, 1952, section 58 contains the provision empowering the Central Government to make rules for all or any of the purposes mentioned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 1997

State Vs. B.M.N. Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-18-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 5(1), 17, 18, 28, 58 and 73; Oil Mines Regulations, 1984 - Regulations 19, 20 and 44; Criminal procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 197, 251, 255 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 120-B, 204, 420, 468 and 471; Oil and Natural Gas Commission Act, 1993 - Sections 28; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(11)

Reported in : 1998(4)ALD13; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)154

: The Inspector of Mines having been appointed by the Central Government purportedly under Section 5(1) of the Mines Act, 1952, filed a complaint against the respondents herein alleging that there was a blow out in the oil well … thereunder.(2) The responsibility in respect of matters provided for in the rules made underclauses (e) and (p) of Section 58 shall be exclusively carried out by the owner or agent of the mines and by such person other

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 2007

Registrar of Companies Vs. Shashi theatres Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-23-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Income-tax Act; Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 58(B)(2) and 58B(20); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 58A, 159, 162, 234 and 598; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 66 and 79; Bombay City Municipal Act, 1888 - Sections 390(1); Essential Commodities Act; Drugs Control Act; Food Adulteration Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200, 468, 468(2), 472 and 473; Order, 1990 - Sections 2; Companies (Acceptance of Deposit) Rules, 1975 - Rules 10 and 11

Reported in : 2008CriLJ1461

purpose on State of Bihar v. Deokaran Nenshi : 1973CriLJ347 . It was a case arising under the Mines Act, 1952. Section 66 of the Mines Act 1952, provides that any person omitting inter alia to furnish any return, notice … to quote the relevant paragraph No. 5 of the judgment which also refers to the provision of Section 58(B)(2) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, which is as under:5. As I read Rule 10 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 02 2006

Ramchand Onkarlal Agarwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-02-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 1(4), 1(5), 2(12) and 87; Beedi Workers Welfare Fund Act, 1976; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 4 and 3; Employees' Provident Fund and Misc. Provisions Act, 1952; Employees' State Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1989; Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966 - Sections 26, 28, 37(3), 38(2), 39, 46, 49, 50, 51, 52(A), 56, 58, 59 and 61; Beedi Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1976; Maternity Benefits Act, 1961; Central Excises Act, 1944; Bidi and Cigar Workers (Regulation of Conditions of Service) Act; Mines Act, 1952; Factories Act, 1948; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Maharashtra Workmen Minimum House Rent Allowance Act, 1983; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1941 - Sections 61; Payment of Wages

Reported in : 2006(5)BomCR884; (2006)IIILLJ441Bom; 2006(4)MhLj339

or is ordinarily so carried on but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 or a railway running shed;seasonal factory' means a factory which is exclusively engaged in one or more of … 45(c)5. Section 52(A) - Occupational disease.6. Section 56 - Medical benefits to the insured person and his family.7. Section 58 - Provision of medical treatment by State Government (State Government to provide reasonable medical treatment, surgical and obstetric).8.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1980

New Satgram Engineering Works and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-14-1980

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3(1), 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 17(1), 18, 18(1), 18(2), 18(3), 18(4), 18(5), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(3), 19(4), 19(6), 19(7), 20 to 27; Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 - Sections 22(3); Coal Mines Nationalisation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1978; Coal Mines (Taking over of Management) Act, 1973; Coal Mines (Taking over of Management) Ordinance, 1973; Constitution of India - Article 32 and 226; Coal Mines (Conservation, Safety and Development) Act, 1952 - Sections 4; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Coal Mines Provident Fund, Family Pension and Bonus Schemes Act, 1948 - Sections 3C, 20(3), 21, 22, 23, 24, 24-A, 25, 26, 26(1) and 26(5); Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Constitution of India (Thirty ninth Amendment) Ac

Reported in : AIR1981SC124; (1980)4SCC570; [1981]1SCR406

incumbrances. Parliament instead of providing that the word 'mine' shall have the meaning assigned to it in the Mines Act, 1952 has given an enlarged definition of 'mine' in Section 2(h) so that not merely the colliery but everything … accounted for the realisation, if any, and the disbursement of two amounts of Rs. 68.74 lakhs and Rs. 58.22 lakhs, representing the outstanding dues from sundry debtors as on the appointed day, i.e., January 31, 1973 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1978

Madura Coats Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-03-1978

Subject : Excise

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 24; Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 3; Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 29; Mines (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 57 and 58; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10 and 75; Finance Act, 1972 - Sections 64; Arms Act, 1878 - Sections 15

Reported in : 1979CENCUS17D; 1978(2)ELT511(Mad)

present is a case, where the Mines Act, 1923 was repealed and was re-enacted with modifications as the Mines Act, 1952; Section 29 of the 1923 Act empowering the Central Government to make regulations onsis-tent with the Act for specified … Rules of 1946 framed under the Mines Act of 1923, were deemed to be rules framed under Section 58(d) of the 1952 Act. In Neel v. State of West Bengal, : [1973]1SCR675 , a notification of 1923

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1960

The State of Orissa Vs. Iswar Das and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-11-1960

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulation, 1926 - Sections 3(1); Constitution of India - Article 20; General Caluses Act - Sections 24

Reported in : AIR1960Ori180; 1960CriLJ1355

1952 (Act XXXV of 1952) and the Central Government have been empowered to frame rules and regulations under Section 58(n) and Section 57(t) respectively. The Mines Rules 1955 were framed under Section 58 of the 1952 Act. No … by limitation; and (2) the Indian Minos Act, 1923, (Act IV of 1923), having been repealed by the Mines Act, 1952, (Act 35 of 1932), the Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulation which was framed under the 1923 Act was no

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 1991

Neyveli Lignite Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-03-1991

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1992)(58)ELT76TriDel

Matched in: Citation (1992)(58)ELT76TriDel

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2011

The Workmen of Taroda Opencast Mine of Western Coalfields Limited Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jan-05-2011

Subject : Labour and Industrial

of contractor was in violation of Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1947, and also all provisions of Mines Act, 1952 and Mines Rules, 1955, framed thereunder. They also pointed out various provisions of bipartite agreement between employees of … said events have taken place during the pendency of reference proceedings and hence are hit by provisions of Section 33 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Those developments are, therefore, stated to be irrelevant and insignificant insofar as … to show when person can be said to be employed and Section 58(o) and (p) thereof are pressed into service with provisions of Chapter IX

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 2016

K. Krishna Swamy and Others Vs. Chairman and Managing Director, The Si ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-09-2016

Subject : Education

appoint a Welfare Officer to look after the welfare of workers. In terms of the mandate of the Mines Act, 1952 (for short, Act, 1952') and the Rules made there under, the respondent company created the cadre of Welfare … prescribed for the post of Welfare Officer/Management Trainee (Personnel), in the Rules made in exercise of power under Section 58(q) of the Act, 1952, the same is sacrosanct and not to be breached. In substance, the submission

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial