Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: mines act 1952 section 57 · Page 1 of about 767 results (0.066 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 18 1972

New Beerbhoom Coal Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Joint Director of Mines, Safe ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-18-1972

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Section 57; ;Coal Mines Regulations, 1957 - Regulation 191(1) and 191(2); ;Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 19(6) and 23

Reported in : AIR1973Cal17

points raised.5. The impugned Regulation had been made by the Central Government in exercise of its powers under Section 57 of the Mines Act, 1952 (Act 35 of 1952). This Act was passed with a view to amending … Regulation.2. The Regulation impugned is the one which was incorporated into the Coal Mines Regulations framed under the Mines Act. 1952 by the Central Government by the notification No. GSR 1298 dated August 22, 1967, The Impugned Regulation is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2006

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and Tata Iron and Steel Company Vs. the State ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-22-2006

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 3, 3(6), 5 to 13, 13(2), 14, 15, 15(1), 17A(2), 28, 28(3) and 57; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) (Amendment) Act, 1972; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 57; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 27, 27(1), 27(2), 27(5), 54(1), 64 and 64A; Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 - Rule 38A; Mineral Concession Regulations; Metaliferous Mines Regulations, 1961 - Regulation 4

Reported in : [2007(1)JCR25(Jhr)]

petitioners, which deals with the violation of Regulation 4 of the regulations framed under Section 57 of The Mines Act, 1952. Section 57 of The Mines Act, 1952 empowers the Central Government to make regulations for purposes specified in that section.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2006

Ashoke Kumar Banerjee and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-22-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1993; Bihar Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishad Act, 1961 - Sections 75(1); Bihar Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishad (Condition of Service) Rules, 1964 - Rules 7(3) to (6), 7 and 9; Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1947; Bihar Panchayat Raj (Amendment) Act, 1993 - Sections 157; Bihar Panchayat Raj (Amendment) Act, 2001; Bihar and Orissa General Clauses Act - Sections 27; Constitution of India (73rd Amendment) Act, 1992; Mines Act, 1923; Mines Act (Amendment) , 1952 - Sections 57; Mines Regulations, 1926

Reported in : [2006(3)JCR171(Jhr)]

present is a case where the Mines Act, 1923 was repealed and was re-enacted with modifications as the Mines Act, 1952 : Section 29 of the 1923 Act empowering the Central Govt. to make regulations consistent with the Act … Govt. to make regulations consistent with the Act for specified purposes was re-enacted in the 1952 Act as Section 57 : regulations were made in 1926 under Section 29 of the 1923 Act, but at the relevant date,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 03 2005

K.K. Sharan and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-03-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2C, 72C(1), 73 and 75; Coal Mines Regulation, 1957 - Regulations 36(1), 42(1), 44(8), 57(3) and 112; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 286, 288, 304A, 337, 338 and 447

Reported in : [2005(3)JCR481(Jhr)]

No. 134/96. Thereafter Director of Mines and Safety, Koderma region also investigated the matter under the provisions of Mines Act, 1952 to know the causes and circumstances which led to the accident and on final conclusion of his investigation, … 72-C(1)(a) and Section 72-C(1)(b) of Mines Act, 1957 alleging contravention of Regulations 57(3), 42(1), 44(8) and Regulations 112 and 36(1) of Coal Mines Regulation, 1957 … ORDERH.S. Prasad, J.1. This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for quashing the entire criminal case against the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2017

Binoy Kumar Mishra Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Director of Mines Safety, Dhanbad (Jharkhand) (respondent No.2 herein) commenced inquiry/investigation on 06.01.1996 under Section 23(2) of the Mines Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). Based on the inquiry report dated 12.02.1996 submitted by respondent No.2, a … therein. Section 24 of the Act empowers the Government to appoint court of inquiry in case of accidents. Section 57 of the Act confers power on the Central Government to make Regulations for all or any of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1978

Madura Coats Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-03-1978

Subject : Excise

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 24; Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 3; Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 29; Mines (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 57 and 58; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10 and 75; Finance Act, 1972 - Sections 64; Arms Act, 1878 - Sections 15

Reported in : 1979CENCUS17D; 1978(2)ELT511(Mad)

present is a case, where the Mines Act, 1923 was repealed and was re-enacted with modifications as the Mines Act, 1952; Section 29 of the 1923 Act empowering the Central Government to make regulations onsis-tent with the Act for specified … Government to make regulations onsis-tent with the Act for specified purposes was re-enacted in the 1952 Act as Section 57 regulations were made in 1926 under Section 29 of the 1923 Act; but at the relevant date in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1961

Mohan Lal Goenka and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-18-1961

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 17, 18, 18(1), 18(2), 46, 57, 58, 73 and 88; Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 24, 29 and 30; Creche Rules, 1946 - Rules 3, 3(1), 7 and 7(1); Constitution of India - Article 134(1)

Reported in : AIR1961SC1543; 1961CriLJ713; [1961(3)FLR326]; (1961)IILLJ404SC; [1962]2SCR36

standards of such rooms, and the nature and extent of the supervision to be provided therein." In the Mines Act, 1952, section 58 contains the provision empowering the Central Government to make rules for all or any of the purposes … of every mine shall appoint a person having the prescribed qualification as a manager of the mine. Section 57(c) provides for the framing of regulations prescribing the qualifications for the manager of mines. I will assume that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2019

The State of Meghalaya Vs. All Dimasa Students Union Hasao District Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-03-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

has no jurisdiction under the Mines Act, 1952 to take any action.118. In exercise of the power under Section 57 of Mines Act, 1952 a new set of regulations has been 122 framed, namely, Coal Mines Regulations, 2017. … empowers the District Magistrate to institute prosecution against any owner, agent or manager for any offence under the Mines Act, 1952. Section 75 is 121 as follows:- “75. Prosecution of owner, agent or manager.--No prosecution shall be instituted against any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 1998

Balaji Paper Boards (P) Ltd. and Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Oct-08-1998

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1998)(62)ECC631

effect as if enacted in the Act. The Mines Act 1923 was repealed by Section 88 of the Mines Act 1952. The question for consideration was whether the Mines Regulations 1926 framed under Section 29 of the Mines Act … permit can be granted for a period but not exceeding 4 months without following the procedure prescribed under Section 57 of that Act. It was further observed that an authority having jurisdiction over a comparatively small area was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 1957

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. A.K. JaIn and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-20-1957

Subject : Criminal

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 57 to 62, 73, 74 and 88; Constitution of India - Article 20

Reported in : AIR1958MP162; 1958CriLJ767

regulations and bye-laws made under the Indian Mines Act, 1923 and deemed to have been made under the Mines Act, 1952, read with Section 24 of the General Clauses Act, be quashed.Criminal Appeal No. 302 of 1956 and criminal … Act, power to make rules, regulations and bye-laws was conferred on the Central Government under Chapter VIII (Ss. 57 to 62) and disobedience or contraventions of the rules, regulations or bye-iaws so framed was made punishable under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial