Advanced Search Results

Employer in Relation to the Management of Central Mine Planning and De ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(F), 2(K) and 10(1); Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(J) and 48; Mines Rules - Rules 48, 51 and 77

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR647(Jhr)]

His final argument is that the petitioner cannot be brought within the definition of Section 2(j) of the Mines Act, 1952 because it is not a 'Mine' within the said definition and therefore the Central Government could not have … Writ Application challenging the award dated 01.05.1997 (Annexure-14) passed by the respondent No. 2 in Reference Case No. 51 of 1993, whereby and whereunder it has inter alia been held that the action of the petitioner in

Ramchand Onkarlal Agarwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 1(4), 1(5), 2(12) and 87; Beedi Workers Welfare Fund Act, 1976; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 4 and 3; Employees' Provident Fund and Misc. Provisions Act, 1952; Employees' State Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1989; Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966 - Sections 26, 28, 37(3), 38(2), 39, 46, 49, 50, 51, 52(A), 56, 58, 59 and 61; Beedi Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1976; Maternity Benefits Act, 1961; Central Excises Act, 1944; Bidi and Cigar Workers (Regulation of Conditions of Service) Act; Mines Act, 1952; Factories Act, 1948; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Maharashtra Workmen Minimum House Rent Allowance Act, 1983; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1941 - Sections 61; Payment of Wages

Reported in : 2006(5)BomCR884; (2006)IIILLJ441Bom; 2006(4)MhLj339

or is ordinarily so carried on but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 or a railway running shed;seasonal factory' means a factory which is exclusively engaged in one or more of … : Sickness benefit (read along with Regulation 45(a).3. Section 50 - Maternity benefits (read along with Regulation 45(b).4. Section 51 - Disablement benefits (read along with Regulation 45(c)5. Section 52(A) - Occupational disease.6. Section 56 - Medical benefits

United India Insurance Company Ltd., Rep. by Its Divisional Manager Vs ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(8), 2(12), 2(14), 46, 58A, 61, 166 and 173; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 53; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Mines Act, 1952

Reported in : 2003(3)ALD627; (2003)IIILLJ403AP

or is ordinarily so carried on, but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (Act No. 35 of 1952) or a railway running shed; Likewise, Section 2(14) of the Act defines insured … Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 itself is not maintainable. The learned counsel also had drawn my attention to Section 51-A, Section 46 and also Sections 2(8), 2(12) and 2(14) of the Act. The learned counsel while concluding his

Transport Corporation of India Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corpn. a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 1(5), 2(9), 2(13), 2(17), 3, 15-A, 38, 39, 40, 45-A, 46, 49, 50, 51 and 97; Indian Companies Act, 1956; Mines Act, 1952

Reported in : AIR2000SC238; JT1999(9)SC12; (2000)ILLJ1SC; (2000)1MLJ128(SC); 2000(2)MPHT295; 1999(7)SCALE63; (2000)1SCC332; [1999]Supp4SCR393; 2000(1)LC287(SC); (2000)1UPLBEC1

power or is ordinarily so carried on,but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 or a railway running shed;As noted earlier, the Act, which is a Central Act having all India operation, … of the Act. Maternity benefits are provided by Section 50 of the Act. Disablement benefits are provided by Section 51 of the Act. Section 51-A to 51-D deal with the benefits available in case of accidents arising in

Hotel Neelkamal, Through Its Prop. Shri Kamal Singh Verma, S/O Shri Am ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994; Madhya Pradesh Hotel Tatha Vas Grihon Me Vilas Vastuon Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1988 - Sections 6; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 27(6) and 81; Sales Tax Act - Sections 3, 11A, 16, 17, 18, 19, 19A, 20, 21, 22, 22A, 23, 24, 24A, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 33, 33B, 33C, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 42A, 43, 44, 45, 45A, 45B, 46, 47, 47A, 48 and 51; Madhya Pradesh General Clauses Act - Sections 8, 8(1) and 13; Customs Act, 1962; Sea Customs Act, 1878; Indian Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 2; Coal Mines Provident Fund and Bonus Schemes Act, 1948; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Probation Act - Sections 13(2), 18 and 19; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 12; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 360 and 562; Madhya Pradesh Vanijya Kar Adhin

Reported in : (2007)5VST260(MP)

should be construed as references to the definition of 'owner' in Clause (1) of Section 2 of the Mines Act, 1952, which repealed and re-enacted 1923 Act. Consequently, the references to Section 562 of Old Code in Section 19 … 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 42A, 43, 44, 45, 45A, 45B, 46, 47, 47A, 48 and 51 of the Sales Tax X Act and the Rules orders and notifications issued thereunder shall mutatis mutandis apply

State Vs. Ardeshir Hormusji Bhiwandiwala

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 6, 7, 17, 34, 35, 44, 51, 52, 53, 54, 59, 67, 69, 79, 92, 106 and 112; Bombay Factories Act, 1947; Bombay Factories Rules, 1950 - Rules 3 and 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Factories Act, 1911 - Sections 2 and 2(3); Factories (Amendment) Act, 1954; Mines Act, 1952; Public Health Act, 1875 - Sections 4; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1925

Reported in : AIR1956Bom219; (1956)58BOMLR66; 1956CriLJ488; ILR1956Bom321; (1956)IILLJ26Bom

or is ordinarily so carried on, but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952, or a railway running shed'. It is thus clear that in the Factories Act of 1948 the words … of the Factories Act in such a detailed manner. Section 44 contains provisions for sitting facilities for workers. Section 51 prohibits an occupier of a factory from requiring an adult worker to work for more than 48 hours

Hindustan Unilever Limited Vs. Member, Industrial Court and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

of 1948). (ii) a mine as defined in clause (j) of sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952); or (iii) a plantation as defined in clause (f) of Section 2 of the Plantations … of the Apex Court and of this Court, laying down the guidelines to appreciate and decide this question. 51. Both the learned counsels have taken me through the following decisions in support of their rival contentions. (i)

Vijay Krishna Kumbhar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy Property

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 22, 23(1), 26, 28, 29, 31, 37, 38, 44, 45, 47, 49, 51, 58, 59 to 112, 125, 126, 127, 128 to 151, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157 and 158; Constitution of India - Articles 13-010, 19(1), 19-045, 133, 141, 166(3) and 226; Development Control Rules, 1982 - Rules 1.3, 5, 6.1.1 and 13.5; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1931; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 12-A, 18 and 54; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 22; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37-I and 269(UA); Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 3 to 20, 21 to 58, 159, 253, 254, 255 and 481; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1951 - Sections 1 to 7; Bombay Village Panchayat Act, Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 40, 41, 42, 43, 46, 51 and 52;

Reported in : 2000(2)BomCR293

made under section 29 of the Mines Act, 1923 which was repealed and re-enacted with modifications as the Mines Act, 1952. The question posed for the consideration of the Supreme Court was whether subordinate legislation like Regulations or Rules … enjoins upon the planning authority to be conscious of and act within the provisions of the development plan.159. Section 51 empowers a planning authority to revoke or modify a permission expressly granted or deemed to be granted under

Sudhanshu Gupta, Vs. Airports Authority of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 - Sections 18, 18(1), 18(2), 18(3), 18(5), 18(7), 41, 42, 42(5), 46 and 46(2); International Airport Authority Act, 1971 - Sections 47; National Airport Authority Act, 1985 - Sections 38; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 5 and 5(1); Safety of Civil Aviation Act, 1982; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 2(51), 6, 6(11) and 24; Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 31(4); Mines (Amendment) Act, 1952; Coal Mines Regulations, 1926 - Regulations; ECDA Regulations - 5, 5(1), 5(5), 5(6), 5(9), 5(20), 5(22), 26, 28, 29, 30 and 33; Constitution of India - Articles 31(2), 32, 74(1), 163(1), 226 and 311(2)

Reported in : 2003IVAD(Delhi)743; 105(2003)DLT620; 2003(69)DRJ722; 2004(1)SLJ105(Delhi)

be in force at the relevant date and have to be deemed to be regulations made under the Mines Act, 1952.' 26.Learned senior counsel next referred to the judgment of the Supreme Court in Hasan Nurani Malak v. S.M. … to as 'the said Act' ) which came into force w.e.f. 01.04.1995. In terms of the provisions of Section 18 of the said Act, the employees of the international airport and the National Airport Authority became the … as to arrive at a conclusion that the whole decision is vitiated. 51.The petitioners have reaped what they had sowed. The consequences are harsh, but

Shree Dharma Sudar Industries Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Registrar of Comp ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 469

Reported in : [1989]66CompCas337(Kar)

purpose on State of Bihar v. Deokaran Nenshi, : 1973CriLJ347 . It was a case arising under the Mines Act, 1952. Section 66 of the Mines Act 1952, provides that any person omitting inter alia to furnish any return, notice … and in default to pay the fine to undergo simple imprisonment for a month. Criminal Revision Petition No. 51 of 1986 by the accused is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dt. 30-12-1985