Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: mines act 1952 section 5 · Page 1 of about 2,349 results (0.085 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 18 1997

State Vs. B.M.N. Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-18-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 5(1), 17, 18, 28, 58 and 73; Oil Mines Regulations, 1984 - Regulations 19, 20 and 44; Criminal procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 197, 251, 255 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 120-B, 204, 420, 468 and 471; Oil and Natural Gas Commission Act, 1993 - Sections 28; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(11)

Reported in : 1998(4)ALD13; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)154

: The Inspector of Mines having been appointed by the Central Government purportedly under Section 5(1) of the Mines Act, 1952, filed a complaint against the respondents herein alleging that there was a blow out in the oil well

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2012

Omprakash S/O Jiwandas Miglani Vs. Coal India Limited, a Government of ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jul-13-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is an employee of Mines, as per the provisions of the Mines Act, 1952 and, therefore, is governed by Section 52 thereof. 6. The demand of petitioner to release his leave encashment … there till 31.12.2007. Subsequently he was appointed as a Director (Personnel) Western Coalfields Ltd. for a period of 5 years w.e.f. 01.01.2008 in the pay-scale of Rs.65000-75000. What the petitioner has then done is to put in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2001

The India Cements Limited Represented by Its Managing Director Vs. Dir ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-14-2001

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2001)3MLJ484

of the mines attached to the respective cement manufacturing units for the purpose of Section 76 of the Mines Act 1952. the brief facts leading to the writ petition may be summarized as follows.2. The petitioner namely The India … the use of such persons. In so far as the provisions of Clauses (d), (e) and (p) of Section 5 8, the managers have no responsibilities as the duties and responsibilities of the managers are subject to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 14 2006

Vijay Kumar Singh and ors. and Krishna Kamal Prasad @ Krishna Kant Pra ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Nov-14-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 6, 7, 92, 105, 106 and 119; Bihar Factory Rule, 1950 - Rules 3, 3A, 4, 5 and 11; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Bihar Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1972 - Rules 9 and 21

are doing their Mining operation in their lease hold areas for which they are at liberty under the Mines Act, 1952, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 as well as under the BMMC Rules, 1972. Learned Counsel … Section 7 of the Factory Act and Rules 3, 3A, 4 and 5 of Bihar Factory Rule, 1950.5. It is stated that on 6.9.1999 a … at Sasaram, in Official Case Nos. 67/2002 8. 68/2002, whereby cognizance has been taken for the offences under Sections 6 and 7 of the Factory Act punishable under Section 92 of the Factory Act against these Petitioners.4.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 1979

Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. Vs. Bharat Mining Corporation ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-20-1979

Subject : Contract

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 4; Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 - Sections 3(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73; Coal Mines (Taking over of Management) Ordinance, 1973; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 8, Rule 5 and 5(2) - Order 40, Rule 1; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1)(1), 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 26 and 29; Coal Mines (Conservation, Safety and Development) Act, 1952; Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972; Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1974

Reported in : AIR1980Bom168

also referred to the definition of the word 'owner' as defined in Section 2 (1) (1) of the Mines Act, 1952, and submitted that the word 'owner' is not used as owner of the articles under the definition of … 8 (c) of the written-statement that by an order dated 9th July 1973, passed under the provisions of Section 5 of the said Act, several mines including the said Dakra Buk Buka Mines (along with the said trucks)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 1992

Sivandhi Adityan Vs. Additional Registrar of Companies

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-18-1992

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 2(30), 5, 58A, 58A(1), (4), (5) and (6), 468(2), 477, 478, 539, 543, 545, 621, 625 and 633; Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 - Rules 3A and 11

Reported in : [1995]83CompCas616(Mad); 1994CriLJ1149

was filed in the Court of the Magistrate, Dhanbad, on April 12, 1961. (a) Section 66 of the Mines Act, 1952, provides that a person omitting to file any return, notice etc., in the prescribed form or manner or … could, by no stretch of imagination, be construed as an 'officer in default' in terms and tenor of section 5 of the Act. 9. Mr. K. Illias Ali, learned Additional Central Government Standing Counsel, would, however, repel those

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2012

Omprakash S/O Jiwandas Miglani Vs. Coal India Limited, a Government of ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jul-13-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is an employee of Mines, as per the provisions of the Mines Act, 1952 and, therefore, is governed by Section 52 thereof. 6. The demand of petitioner to release his leave encashment … there till 31.12.2007. Subsequently he was appointed as a Director (Personnel) Western Coalfields Ltd. for a period of 5 years w.e.f. 01.01.2008 in the pay-scale of Rs.65000-75000. What the petitioner has then done is to put in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2000

Bharat Electronics Limited Vs. B.E.L. Head Office Staff Association an ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-07-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 2(1), 3, 4 and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 2; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 2; Mines Act, 1952

Reported in : [2000(85)FLR364]; ILR2000KAR1002; 2001(3)KarLJ201; (2000)IILLJ1042Kant

or is ordinarily so carried on,-- but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952), or a mobile unit belonging to the armed forces of the Union, a railway running … under the Act.5. Petitioner-Company, aggrieved by the speaking order of the Certifying Officer has preferred an appeal under Section 6 of the Act within the prescribed time before the Appellate Authority, who in turn by his order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2002

The Regional Director, E.S.i. Corporation Vs. Fact Engineering Works P ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-05-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act; Employees State Insurance Act - Sections 1(4), 1(5), 2(12), 2(13), 2(17), 40(1), 40(2), 41(1A) and 87; Mines Act, 1952; Factories Act, 1948

Reported in : [2003(97)FLR308]

or is ordinarily so carried on, but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952) or a railway running shed;'9. Section 1(5) of the Act enables the Government after following

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2007

Umesh Prasad Singh Vs. Coal India Limited Through Its Chairman-cum-m.D ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-18-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 52(1) and 52(10)

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR2428; [2007(4)JCR200(Jhr)]

are dismissed.However, in the facts and circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to cost. Mines Act, 1952, Section 52(1)-Leave encashment Scheme para 7.1-Claiming benefit under-Leave Encashment Scheme-Petitioner-Resigned on 4.5.1999-Claimed for payment of wages in lien 146

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial