Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: mines act 1952 section 36 · Page 1 of about 688 results (0.060 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 03 2005

K.K. Sharan and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-03-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2C, 72C(1), 73 and 75; Coal Mines Regulation, 1957 - Regulations 36(1), 42(1), 44(8), 57(3) and 112; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 286, 288, 304A, 337, 338 and 447

Reported in : [2005(3)JCR481(Jhr)]

No. 134/96. Thereafter Director of Mines and Safety, Koderma region also investigated the matter under the provisions of Mines Act, 1952 to know the causes and circumstances which led to the accident and on final conclusion of his investigation, … 1957 alleging contravention of Regulations 57(3), 42(1), 44(8) and Regulations 112 and 36(1) of Coal Mines Regulation, 1957 against K.K. Sharan, Agent. B.C. Manjhi, Manager, … ORDERH.S. Prasad, J.1. This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for quashing the entire criminal case against the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2000

Shveta Rangray and Others Vs. Thapar Institute of Engineering and Tech ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-25-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, Academic Regulations of the Institute, Regulations - Regulations 9, 15, 17, 19 and 176; Ordinance of Punjab University, Patiala - Ordinance 18; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 36(4)

Reported in : AIR2001P& H13

word was used in the proviso to the exclusionary clause in sub-section (i) of Section 3 of the Mines Act, 1952 their Lordships read the word 'and' as 'or'. As stated in the Law Lexicon it would depend on … their Lordships considered the question whether the word 'and' could be read as 'or' in sub-section (4) of Section 36 of the Industrial Disputes Act which bars a lawyer from appearing before an Industrial Tribunal without the consent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1987

Chandra Spinning and Weaving Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Companie ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-14-1987

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : [1990]69CompCas117(Kar); ILR1988KAR149

21 in each year. Failure to forward the returns as required is punishable under Section 66 of the Mines Act, 1952. On the failure of the respondents to furnish the returns by the due date, a complaint had been … made punishable under Section 220(3) of the Act is not a continuing contravention. - LIMITATION ACT, 1963.[C.A. No. 36/1963]. Articles 120 &121: [D.V. Shylendra Kumar, J] Application for bringing the LRs. of the deceased respondent in an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 25 1971

Amar Singh Modi Lal Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-25-1971

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; ;C.P. and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 6(1); Punjab Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 1964; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1972P& H356

and sidings, whether above or below ground, in or adjacent to or belonging to a mine. Provided........'The Indian Mines Act, 1952, which repealed and substituted the Act of 1923 gave even a more extended meaning to the word 'mine' … by virtue of the General Government Notification No. G.S.R. 436, dated the 1st of June, 1958, issue under Section 3(e) of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation & Development) Act, 1957, is the important and slightly intricate question … entirely ignored. In Aswimi Kumar Ghose v. Arabinda Bose, AIR 1952 SC 369, B. K. Mukerjea J., observed as follows in this context:--'Punctuation is after

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2005

P.C. Agarwala Vs. Payment of Wages Inspector, M.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-26-2005

Subject : Labour and IndustrialCompany

Acts : Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 7, 7A, 15, 15(1), 15(3), 15(4) and 17; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25O; Madhya Pradesh Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1983; Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 - Sections 9, 36, 61, 64A and 67; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1) and 15; Madhya Pradesh Payment of Wages (Amendment) Act, 1964 - Sections 2 and 3; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 7(1) and 85(1); Factories (Amendment) Act, 1987; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1); Plantations Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 2; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193, 219, 228 and 405; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(17), 40, 85B and 85C; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 5 and 2

Reported in : AIR2006SC3576; [2005]127CompCas787(SC); (2005)6CompLJ227(SC); [2005(107)FLR826]; JT2005(8)SC544; 2005(7)SCALE519; (2005)8SCC104; [2005]63SCL109(SC); 2006(1)SLJ24(SC)

'mine' has the meaning assigned to it in Clause (j) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Mines Act, 1952 ( 35 of 1952);(iii) 'plantation' has the meaning assigned to it in Clause (f) of Section 2 of … disconnection of electricity. One particular trade union filed an application before the Labour Court in Gwalior under Sections 36, 61 and 64A of the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 (in short the 'MPIR Act'). The Labour

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 1983

Bandhua Mukti Morcha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-16-1983

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 32(1), 32(2), 39, 41, 42, 226 and 256; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XXVI - Order XLVI, Rules 6, 13, 14, 19, 20, 21 and 22; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act; Inter-State Migrant Workmen Rules; Mines Rules, 1955 - Rules 30 to 32; Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 - Sections 2(1), 4, 8, 12 and 21; Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Central Rules, 1980 - Rules 22 to 45; Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 4, 5 and 10 to 15; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Evidence Act; Contract Labour Act - Sections 2(1), 16, 17, 18 and 19; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Central Rules

Reported in : AIR1984SC802; 1984LabIC560; 1983(2)SCALE1151; (1984)3SCC161; [1984]2SCR67; 1984(16)LC29(SC); 1983 (3) SCC 161

employed in the stone quarries. The first statute to which we must refer in this connection is the Mines Act, 1952. This Act extends to the whole of India and therefore applies a fortiorari in the State of Haryana. … various other facilities particulars of which are to be found in Rules 36 to 45 of the Inter-State Migrant Workmen Rules. These facilities include medical … abolition of bonded labour system with a view to preventing the economic and physical exploitation of the weaker sections of the people. But, unfortunately, as subsequent events have shown and that is borne out also by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 2013

M/S. Lithoferro a Partnership Firm Represented by Its Partners and Oth ...

Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-09-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

short ‘the Abolition Act), the concessions were abolished and were deemed to be mining leases granted under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The correctness of this State action leading to abolition of such … Chairmanship of Justice M.B. Shah (Retired Judge of the Supreme Court of India) under the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952 vide notification dated 22nd November, 2010 to examine illegal and unjustified mining activities going on in the States … its powers and in performance of its functions under the provisions of Section 5 of the Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986 (for short ‘the Act). Section … of State of Bihar v. L.K. Advani and Ors. (2003) 8 SCC 361. Once the report prepared by Justice M.B. Shah Commission was tabled before

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2021

Amazon.com Nv Investment Holdings Llc Vs. Future Retail Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-06-2021

Subject : Arbitration

General of Coal Mines in exercise of his powers under the Coal Mines Regulations, 1957 read with the Mines Act, 1952, held as follows: “12. If we look into Conditions 3 and 6 with the object and purpose of … to stress that orders may be made under Section 9 until enforcement of an award in accordance with Section 36, and then read Section 36 to make it clear that the contours of Section 37 did not go

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2004

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Karam Chand Thapar and Brs. (Coal Sales) Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-10-2004

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Coal Mines (Conservation and Development) Act, 1974 - Sections 4(2), 5(2), 9, 10, 10(2), 12 and 18; Coal Mines (Conservation and Safety) Act, 1952; - Sections 13(3); Coal Mines (Conservations and Safety) Rules, 1954 - Rules 35(2), 36, 37, 40(3) and 49; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 8, Rule 6 and 6(1)

Reported in : (SCSuppl)2004(3)CHN144; [2004(2)JCR278(SC)]; JT2004(3)SC286; (2004)3MLJ146(SC); 2004(3)SCALE203; (2004)3SCC504

is empowered to make rules.6. In exercise of the power, conferred by the Coal Mines (Conservation and Safety) Act, 1952 on the Central Government, the Central Government has framed the Coal Mines (Conservations and Safety) Rules 1954. Rule … Mines (Conservation & Development) Act, 1974 came into force on and from April 1, 1975. Clause (j) of Section 3 defines 'stowing' to mean as the operation of filling, with sand or any other material, or with … coal which is required to be undertaken by an order under Rule 36 or 37;(d) for the following measures voluntarily undertaken by the owner agent,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 1984

Bhagirath Kanoria and ors. Vs. State of M. P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-24-1984

Subject : CriminalLabour and Industrial

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468, 468 (2), 472 and 473

Reported in : AIR1984SC1688; (1984)3CompLJ49(SC); 1984(2)Crimes441(SC); [1984(49)FLR382]; 1984(2)SCALE218; (1984)4SCC222; [1985]1SCR626

each year. Failure to forward the returns as required is punishable with fine Under Section 66 of the Mines Act, 1952. The respondents having failed to furnish the returns by the due date, which was January 21, 1960 a … employer's contribution of the Provident Fund is a continuing offence, arises because of the provisions contained in Chapter XXXVI of the Code which is entitled 'Limitation for taking cognizance of certain offences.' Sections 468, 472 and 473

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial