Advanced Search Results

Ritz Private Limited Vs. Lal Bavta Hotel Aur Bakery Mazdoor Union and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25N and 25O; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28(1)

Reported in : [1999(81)FLR524]; (1999)IILLJ255Bom

are not included. This is preceded by an exclusion of a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952).13. I deliberately deal separately with these two provisions because apparently the learned Industrial Court was … more than 50 workmen, on September 16, 1991 the Petitioner-employer issued a Notice to the appropriate Government under Section 25-FFA of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, stating therein that the Petitioner-employer intends to close down their department

Rajinder Singh Chauhan and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 25F, 25K, 25L, 25N, 25N(1), 25N(3) and 25N(4); ;Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 2(1); ;Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; ;Plantations Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 2; ;Haryana State Federation of Consumers Co-operative Wholesales Stores Limited Staff Service Rules, 1975 - Rules 4, 10(5), 10(6), 35 and 35(L)

Reported in : 2005(85)DRJ139; [2006(108)FLR1]; JT2005(10)SC25; (2006)ILLJ303SC; RLW2006(1)SC308; 2005(9)SCALE428; (2005)13SCC179; 2006(2)SLJ26(SC)

Act, 1948(63 of 1948);(ii) a mine as defined in clause (j) of sub-section(1) of Section 2 of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952); or(iii) a plantation as defined in clause (f) of Section 2 of the Plantations Labour

Welcomegroup Windsor Manor Sheraton and Towers, Rep. by Its Vice Presi ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(12)

Reported in : [2004(102)FLR369]; ILR2004KAR2231; 2004(4)KarLJ223

or is ordinarily so carried on, -but does not include a mine subject to the operation of [the Mines Act, 1952 (XXXV of 1952)], or (a mobile unit belonging to the armed forces of the Union, a railway shed … appellant informed the Inspector that Windsor Manor was a Hotel and not a factory within the meaning of Section 2(m) of the Factories Act. The appellant thus insisted that there was no need for it to take

Birla Jute Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Electricity Duty Act, 1949 - Sections 3; Madhya Pradesh Electricity Duty (Amendment) Act, 1978; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1982MP225

for purpose of professional pursuits' shall include the premises used- (1) for the purposes of mines to which Mines Act, 1952 (No. 35 of 1952) applies; (2) for the purposes of industries which do not require raw materials for … contention of the petitioner in this petition is that the proper rate of duty under the Schedule in Section 3 of the Electricity Duty Act applicable for electrical energy consumed in the crushing unit located in the

Bharat Electronics Limited Vs. B.E.L. Head Office Staff Association an ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 2(1), 3, 4 and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 2; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 2; Mines Act, 1952

Reported in : [2000(85)FLR364]; ILR2000KAR1002; 2001(3)KarLJ201; (2000)IILLJ1042Kant

or is ordinarily so carried on,-- but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952), or a mobile unit belonging to the armed forces of the Union, a railway running … under the Act.5. Petitioner-Company, aggrieved by the speaking order of the Certifying Officer has preferred an appeal under Section 6 of the Act within the prescribed time before the Appellate Authority, who in turn by his order

Abdullabhai Kasamali Bohara Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1957)59BOMLR1163

under Act-Amendment of complaint six months after commission of offence, whether c2 valid.; Section 79 of the Indian Mines Act, 1952, purports to lay down a limitation for prosecutions under that Act, and the words of the section do … was charged for various offences under Sections 73, 74(i)(c), 69 and 62 of the Indian Mines Act, (No. XXXV of 1952), and convicted in four separate cases summarily tried by the Magistrate, First Class, Bhandara.2. In each

Narsayya Lingayya Vilasagar Vs. Joint Regional Director, E.S.i. Corpor ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(9)

Reported in : (1997)IIILLJ519Bom

without the aid of power, or is ordinarily so carried on; but excluding a mine subject to the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952), or a railway running shed or an establishment which is exclusively engaged in any of … said order, the trial Court dismissed the said application preferred by the appellants before the trial Court under Section 75 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. 2. Shri Narsayya Lingayya Vilasagar used to run two handloom

State Vs. Ardeshir Hormusji Bhiwandiwala

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 6, 7, 17, 34, 35, 44, 51, 52, 53, 54, 59, 67, 69, 79, 92, 106 and 112; Bombay Factories Act, 1947; Bombay Factories Rules, 1950 - Rules 3 and 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Factories Act, 1911 - Sections 2 and 2(3); Factories (Amendment) Act, 1954; Mines Act, 1952; Public Health Act, 1875 - Sections 4; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1925

Reported in : AIR1956Bom219; (1956)58BOMLR66; 1956CriLJ488; ILR1956Bom321; (1956)IILLJ26Bom

or is ordinarily so carried on, but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952, or a railway running shed'. It is thus clear that in the Factories Act of 1948 the words … from the purview of this beneficient provision? Our answer must only be in the negative. Turning next to Section 35, it says that, where a manufacturing process involves risk to the eyes by reason of exposure to excessive

Sandur Manganese and Iron Ores Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Mineral Concession

Acts : Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 26 (1), 35, 59, 60; Mines And Minerals Development and Regulation Act, 1957 - Section 5(1), 11, 11(3)

of the State Government by filing a Revision Petition before the Government of India, Ministry of Coal and Mines, New Delhi. On 09.04.1999, the Government of India by holding that the order passed by the State Government … under the Act of 1948. The State Legislature of Orissa then passed the Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act, 1952 and levied a fee for the development of mining areas within the State. After the provisions came into … 06.12.2004, the State Government sought the approval of the Central Government under Section 5(1) of the MMDR Act to grant lease to Jindal over an … Ziaullah Sharieff (another applicant for a mining lease) filed Writ Petition No. 35915 of 2001 (GM-MMS) before the High Court seeking declaration that he is

State of Rajasthan Vs. Pannalal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulations, 1926; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 88; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24; Part B States (Laws) Act, 1951 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1958Raj59; 1958CriLJ226

State against the acquittal of Pannalal and eight others of an offence under Section 73 of the Indian Mines Act, 1952 (No. XXXV of 1952) thereinafter called the Act) read with Rules 23 and 71 of the Indian Metalliferous … of Pannalal and eight others of an offence under Section 73 of the Indian Mines Act, 1952 (No. XXXV of 1952) thereinafter called the Act) read with Rules 23 and 71 of the Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulations,