Advanced Search Results

The Workmen of Taroda Opencast Mine of Western Coalfields Limited Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Labour and Industrial

of contractor was in violation of Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1947, and also all provisions of Mines Act, 1952 and Mines Rules, 1955, framed thereunder. They also pointed out various provisions of bipartite agreement between employees of … said events have taken place during the pendency of reference proceedings and hence are hit by provisions of Section 33 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Those developments are, therefore, stated to be irrelevant and insignificant insofar as controversy

Sylvester and Co. Vs. their workman thro' Transport and Dock Workers' ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10, 25F and 33; Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 3; Mines Act, 1952; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948; Maharashtra Mathadi Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969; Dock Workers Act, 1948; Constitution of India - Article 226; Air India Employees' Service Regulations - Regulation 48

Reported in : 2008(3)BomCR395; (2008)ILLJ546Bom

to the definition in the Mines Act of 1952. The Supreme Court held that Section 2(j) of the Mines Act, 1952 defined a mine as an excavation wherein operation for the purposes of searching for or obtaining mineral ore … Labour Court held that the dismissal was not a discharge simpliciter, but in breach of the provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The judgment of the Supreme Court recorded that before the Labour Court

Hotel Neelkamal, Through Its Prop. Shri Kamal Singh Verma, S/O Shri Am ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994; Madhya Pradesh Hotel Tatha Vas Grihon Me Vilas Vastuon Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1988 - Sections 6; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 27(6) and 81; Sales Tax Act - Sections 3, 11A, 16, 17, 18, 19, 19A, 20, 21, 22, 22A, 23, 24, 24A, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 33, 33B, 33C, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 42A, 43, 44, 45, 45A, 45B, 46, 47, 47A, 48 and 51; Madhya Pradesh General Clauses Act - Sections 8, 8(1) and 13; Customs Act, 1962; Sea Customs Act, 1878; Indian Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 2; Coal Mines Provident Fund and Bonus Schemes Act, 1948; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Probation Act - Sections 13(2), 18 and 19; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 12; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 360 and 562; Madhya Pradesh Vanijya Kar Adhin

Reported in : (2007)5VST260(MP)

should be construed as references to the definition of 'owner' in Clause (1) of Section 2 of the Mines Act, 1952, which repealed and re-enacted 1923 Act. Consequently, the references to Section 562 of Old Code in Section 19 … Sections 3, 17, 18, 19, 19A, 20, 21, 22, 22A, 23, 24, 24A, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 33, 33B, 33C, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 42A, 43, 44, 45, 45A, 45B, 46,

Kailash Kumar Sinha and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : [2007(1)JCR563(Jhr)]

of the relevant papers, the said truck loaded with coal thereon was seized and Gomia P.S. Case No. 33 of 2002 was registered against the petitioners and others for the offence under Sections 413 and 414 of … Sections 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Section 30 of the Mining Act, 1952.3. Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that even though there was no

Bandhua Mukti Morcha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 32(1), 32(2), 39, 41, 42, 226 and 256; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XXVI - Order XLVI, Rules 6, 13, 14, 19, 20, 21 and 22; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act; Inter-State Migrant Workmen Rules; Mines Rules, 1955 - Rules 30 to 32; Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 - Sections 2(1), 4, 8, 12 and 21; Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Central Rules, 1980 - Rules 22 to 45; Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 4, 5 and 10 to 15; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Evidence Act; Contract Labour Act - Sections 2(1), 16, 17, 18 and 19; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Central Rules

Reported in : AIR1984SC802; 1984LabIC560; 1983(2)SCALE1151; (1984)3SCC161; [1984]2SCR67; 1984(16)LC29(SC); 1983 (3) SCC 161

employed in the stone quarries. The first statute to which we must refer in this connection is the Mines Act, 1952. This Act extends to the whole of India and therefore applies a fortiorari in the State of Haryana. … to be complied with in erecting the latrines are provided in Rules 33 to 35 of the Mines Rules 1955 and Rule 36 provides that … abolition of bonded labour system with a view to preventing the economic and physical exploitation of the weaker sections of the people. But, unfortunately, as subsequent events have shown and that is borne out also by the

The Associated Cement Companies Limited, Chaibassa Cement Works, Jhink ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 18(3), 25-C, 25- E and 33; ;Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Plantations Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 2; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2 and 17

Reported in : AIR1960SC56; (1960)ILLJ1SC; [1960]1SCR703

whereas the appropriate authority in respect of the limestone quarry, which was a mine as defined in the Mines Act, 1952, was the Central Government. The second contention was that there were two sets of Standing Orders, one for … a settlement or award in respect of the factory will be binding on the workmen of the factory. Section 33, as far as it is relevant for the argument now under consideration, is in two parts. Sub-section (1)

Balaji Paper Boards (P) Ltd. and Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1998)(62)ECC631

effect as if enacted in the Act. The Mines Act 1923 was repealed by Section 88 of the Mines Act 1952. The question for consideration was whether the Mines Regulations 1926 framed under Section 29 of the Mines Act … the Rules read with Section 11A of the Act. As penalty and confiscation were involved, the provisions of Section 33 were attracted, and in a case where penalty and confiscation are involved, Section 11A alone without Rule 9(2)

Nature Lovers' Forum represented by Its President M.R. Gireeshkumar Vs ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

the following direction as direction No.2: (2) The 2nd respondent shall also ensure that relevant provisions of the Mines Act, 1952 and Metalleferous Regulations, 1961 as far as applicable to a mining operation is followed in its letter and … inserted by Notification dated 05.12.2015 as unconstitutional has also to be allowed. 33. In W.P(C) No.33463 of 2015, one of the prayers is to direct … without obtaining environmental clearance. Some of the private respondents have also not obtained necessary permission as required by Sections 233 and 232 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Stop memo issued by the Village Officer to

M/S. Hindustan Times Limited Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and IndustrialService

Acts : Coal Mines Provident Fund and Bonus Scheme Act, 1948 -- Sections 10F; Indian Limitation Act, 1963 -- Sections 29(2); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 -- Sections 33(2);Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 11, 14-B and 405

Reported in : JT1998(1)SC18a; 1998(1)SCALE34; (1998)2SCC242; [1998]1SCR4; 1998(1)LC368(SC); (1998)1UPLBEC345; AIR 1998 SC 688

in its 116th Report which was endorsed by the Estimates Committee, resulting in the 1973 Act.16. In Coal Mines Provident Fund Commissioner, Dhanbad & Other v. J. Lala & Sons, : (1976)IILLJ91SC , interpreting section 10F of … Regional Provident Fund Commissioner dated 7.5.1980 passed under section 14-B of the Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter called the 'Act') levying damages in a sum of Rs 44,220.00 and Rs. 1,035.50 for delay in … contribution were for a period of more than 6 months. By Act 33/88, the charge was extended to the employee's share of contribution as well.21.

Kmml Titanium Complex Employees vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

in this writ appealis whether the statutory mandate for payment of overtime wages under Section 33 of the Mines Act, 1952 and Rule 60 of the Mines Rules, 1955 can be diluted by a settlement entered into between the