Advanced Search Results

Mohan Lal Goenka and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 17, 18, 18(1), 18(2), 46, 57, 58, 73 and 88; Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 24, 29 and 30; Creche Rules, 1946 - Rules 3, 3(1), 7 and 7(1); Constitution of India - Article 134(1)

Reported in : AIR1961SC1543; 1961CriLJ713; [1961(3)FLR326]; (1961)IILLJ404SC; [1962]2SCR36

Mines Act, 1923,. under which these rules were admittedly framed and, (2) they having been framed under s. 30 (bb) of the Mines Act, 1923, cannot be deemed to be rules made under the Mines Act, 1952, … standards of such rooms, and the nature and extent of the supervision to be provided therein." In the Mines Act, 1952, section 58 contains the provision empowering the Central Government to make rules for all or any of the purposes

Kailash Kumar Sinha and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : [2007(1)JCR563(Jhr)]

Sections 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Section 30 of the Mining Act, 1952.3. Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that even though there was no

The Continental Construction Company (incorporated Under the Indian Co ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Minor, Mineral Concessions Rules - Rule 5(1); Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 16, 30 and 39; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1)(L); Contract Act - Sections 70

Reported in : 2008(4)ALD95; 2008(4)ALT209

contractor does not come within the meaning of 'owner' of the quarry as defined under the provisions of Mines Act, 1952 and in which case he is under no obligation to pay seigniorge fee. A further contention has been … Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, whereby and where under the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge allowed the application filed under Section 30 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 and set aside the award dated 25.9.1989 and directed the appellant herein

Bandhua Mukti Morcha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 32(1), 32(2), 39, 41, 42, 226 and 256; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XXVI - Order XLVI, Rules 6, 13, 14, 19, 20, 21 and 22; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act; Inter-State Migrant Workmen Rules; Mines Rules, 1955 - Rules 30 to 32; Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 - Sections 2(1), 4, 8, 12 and 21; Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Central Rules, 1980 - Rules 22 to 45; Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 4, 5 and 10 to 15; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Evidence Act; Contract Labour Act - Sections 2(1), 16, 17, 18 and 19; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Central Rules

Reported in : AIR1984SC802; 1984LabIC560; 1983(2)SCALE1151; (1984)3SCC161; [1984]2SCR67; 1984(16)LC29(SC); 1983 (3) SCC 161

employed in the stone quarries. The first statute to which we must refer in this connection is the Mines Act, 1952. This Act extends to the whole of India and therefore applies a fortiorari in the State of Haryana. … to contravene any of the previsions of the Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act or Inter-State Migrant Workmen Rules and Section 30 gives over-riding effect to the provisions of the Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act over any other law or any

Employer in Relation to the Management of Central Mine Planning and De ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(F), 2(K) and 10(1); Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(J) and 48; Mines Rules - Rules 48, 51 and 77

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR647(Jhr)]

His final argument is that the petitioner cannot be brought within the definition of Section 2(j) of the Mines Act, 1952 because it is not a 'Mine' within the said definition and therefore the Central Government could not have … regular employment in the Company. The project, according to the petitioner, came to an end with effect from 30.6.1992 and therefore the services of the employees were discontinued as they were not required with effect from 01.07.1992.

M/s. Kumaraswamy Mineral Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka by A ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

application for grant of mining lease. 3. On 29.10.1988, the Director of Mines and Geology recommended the case of the petitioner for grant of mining … any action in respect of a matter which has been referred for inquiry, under the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952 with the prior concurrence of the Lokayukta or an Upalokayukta, as the case may be; (c) any complaint … that the provisions of the Act and the Rules shall apply in relation to the renewal of leases. Section 30 of the Act vests with the Central Government, the power to revise any order made by the State

Sivandhi Adityan Vs. Additional Registrar of Companies

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 2(30), 5, 58A, 58A(1), (4), (5) and (6), 468(2), 477, 478, 539, 543, 545, 621, 625 and 633; Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 - Rules 3A and 11

Reported in : [1995]83CompCas616(Mad); 1994CriLJ1149

was filed in the Court of the Magistrate, Dhanbad, on April 12, 1961. (a) Section 66 of the Mines Act, 1952, provides that a person omitting to file any return, notice etc., in the prescribed form or manner or … 3A of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 (in short 'the Rules'), every company shall before April 30 of each year, deposit or invest, as the case may be, a sum which shall not be less

Omprakash S/O Jiwandas Miglani Vs. Coal India Limited, a Government of ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is an employee of Mines, as per the provisions of the Mines Act, 1952 and, therefore, is governed by Section 52 thereof. 6. The demand of petitioner to release his leave encashment … in Western Coalfields Limited at Korba and continued there till 12.06.1984. Thereafter, he was posted from 14.06.1984 to 30.06.1989 at Nagpur as Personnel Officer, Western Coalfields Ltd. He was promoted on 30.05.1998 and worked as Personnel Manager

Omprakash S/O Jiwandas Miglani Vs. Coal India Limited, a Government of ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is an employee of Mines, as per the provisions of the Mines Act, 1952 and, therefore, is governed by Section 52 thereof. 6. The demand of petitioner to release his leave encashment … in Western Coalfields Limited at Korba and continued there till 12.06.1984. Thereafter, he was posted from 14.06.1984 to 30.06.1989 at Nagpur as Personnel Officer, Western Coalfields Ltd. He was promoted on 30.05.1998 and worked as Personnel Manager

Chandra Spinning and Weaving Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Companie ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : [1990]69CompCas117(Kar); ILR1988KAR149

21 in each year. Failure to forward the returns as required is punishable under Section 66 of the Mines Act, 1952. On the failure of the respondents to furnish the returns by the due date, a complaint had been … krishnaiah passed away in the year 1978.During the financial year of the Company 1979-80, i.e., from 1-7-1979 to 30-6-1980, A-2, A-3 and A-4 were its Directors.Under Section 220(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) (the