Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: mines act 1952 section 27 · Page 1 of about 1,327 results (0.082 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 06 1979

Sri Tarkeshwar Sio Thakur Jiu Vs. Dar Dass Dey and Co. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-06-1979

Subject : Property

Acts : West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 6(1), 27 and 28; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 3, 105, 107 and 108; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Indian Easements Act - Sections 52; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(26)

Reported in : AIR1979SC1669; (1979)3SCC106; [1979]3SCR18

Estates Acquisition Act, 1953, Section 3 of Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957, Section 2 of Mines Act, 1952, Section 52 of Indian Easement Act, 1882 and Section 3 (26) of General Clauses Act, 1897 - appellant who … of Section 6.12. The other relevant provisions are in Chapter IV of the Acquisition Act. They are as follows:Section 27. Provisions of Chapter IV to override other provisions of the Act.-The provisions of this Chapter shall have effect

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 1996

Union of India Vs. A.B. Shah and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-09-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 22, 72, 73 and 79; Coal Mines Regulations, 1957 - Regulation 100(1); Consumers Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1996SC3281; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)15; 1996(2)Crimes181(SC); JT1996(5)SC128; 1996(4)SCALE307; (1996)8SCC540; [1996]Supp2SCR620

Bench), this appeal is filed by special leave.2. The appellant preferred a complaint under Section 73 of the Mines Act 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') read with Regulation No. 100(1) of the Coal Mines Regulations 1957 (hereinafter … the relevant portion from the judgment of the High Court which reads as follows :By the letter ex 27 dated 2nd January 1971, the Director General of Mines Safety granted to the Agent of the Messrs. Oriental

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1980

New Satgram Engineering Works and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-14-1980

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3(1), 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 17(1), 18, 18(1), 18(2), 18(3), 18(4), 18(5), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(3), 19(4), 19(6), 19(7), 20 to 27; Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 - Sections 22(3); Coal Mines Nationalisation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1978; Coal Mines (Taking over of Management) Act, 1973; Coal Mines (Taking over of Management) Ordinance, 1973; Constitution of India - Article 32 and 226; Coal Mines (Conservation, Safety and Development) Act, 1952 - Sections 4; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Coal Mines Provident Fund, Family Pension and Bonus Schemes Act, 1948 - Sections 3C, 20(3), 21, 22, 23, 24, 24-A, 25, 26, 26(1) and 26(5); Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Constitution of India (Thirty ninth Amendment) Ac

Reported in : AIR1981SC124; (1980)4SCC570; [1981]1SCR406

incumbrances. Parliament instead of providing that the word 'mine' shall have the meaning assigned to it in the Mines Act, 1952 has given an enlarged definition of 'mine' in Section 2(h) so that not merely the colliery but everything … to be transferred by the Commissioner of Payments to the General Revenue Account of the Central Government under Section 27.39. In view of all these provisions of Sections 20 to 27 of the Act, and particularly of Sub-section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 07 2003

Employer in Relation to the Management of Central Mine Planning and De ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-07-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(F), 2(K) and 10(1); Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(J) and 48; Mines Rules - Rules 48, 51 and 77

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR647(Jhr)]

His final argument is that the petitioner cannot be brought within the definition of Section 2(j) of the Mines Act, 1952 because it is not a 'Mine' within the said definition and therefore the Central Government could not have … inter alia been held that the action of the petitioner in terminating the services of Naresh Jha and 27 others with effect from 01.07.1992 is not justified and that the concerned workmen are entitled to be reinstated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2010

Obulapuram Mining Company Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by Its Director, Sri B.V. Sri ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-26-2010

Subject : ConstitutionEnvironment

Acts : Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Section 2; ;Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; ;Pollution (Control) Act; ;Indian Forest Act, 1927; ;Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972; ;Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(1A), 4A, 4A(1), 4A(3), 5 and 21; ;Mines Act, 1952; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Section 3(1); ;Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 27(1), 27(2), 27(5) and 50; ;Metalliferrous Mines Regulations, 1961 - Regulation 111(3); ;Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 32, 73, 162 and 246

Reported in : 2010(2)ALT672

concerned, it is stated in the counter that as per the definition of mine as defined under the Mines Act, 1952, it is evident that the stockyard wherein the mineral is stored comes within the definition of premises of … per annum from Lease No. 3. Further, it is having all the statutory clearances including the clearance under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, the clearance under Environment (Protection) Act and the clearance under Pollution (Control) … areas. In this regard, letter of State Government dated 17.3.2009, 22.4.2009, 28.4.2009, 27.6.2009, 15.7.2009, are relevant. The Statute contemplates that any prohibition of work at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2006

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and Tata Iron and Steel Company Vs. the State ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-22-2006

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 3, 3(6), 5 to 13, 13(2), 14, 15, 15(1), 17A(2), 28, 28(3) and 57; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) (Amendment) Act, 1972; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 57; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 27, 27(1), 27(2), 27(5), 54(1), 64 and 64A; Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 - Rule 38A; Mineral Concession Regulations; Metaliferous Mines Regulations, 1961 - Regulation 4

Reported in : [2007(1)JCR25(Jhr)]

petitioners, which deals with the violation of Regulation 4 of the regulations framed under Section 57 of The Mines Act, 1952. Section 57 of The Mines Act, 1952 empowers the Central Government to make regulations for purposes specified in that … 1957 by the Ministry of Steel, Mines and Fuel (Department of Mines & Fuel), Government of India.14. Rule 27 prescribes conditions of mining lease. On perusal of this Rule, it appears that every mining lease shall be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2015

B Kumar Alias Brijendra Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-11-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Gaslitand Colliery, Katras area for which a court of enquiry was constituted under Section 24 of the Mines Act, 1952 (in short ‘the Act’) vide notification dated 17.10.1995 by the Ministry of Labour, Government of India. At the … complaint filed by the complainant­opposite party no.2 on 01.12.2000 relates to an accident which had taken place on 27.09.1995 at 1.30 a.m. at below ground workings of X Special Seam worked though No.6 pit of Union Angarpathra

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 1988

Ram Chander Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-07-1988

Subject : Civil

Acts : Mines & Minerals (Regulation & Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 22(3)

Reported in : 38(1989)DLT402; 1989(16)DRJ159

to get the land demarcated properly but without any success. The petitioner has made reference to provisions of Mines Act, 1952, to show that no proper inspection has been made. On the basis of inspection carried on September 3, … The petitioner has made reference to an order made on March 23, 1984, by the said Director under Section 22(3) of the Mines Act prohibiting employment of any labour in the said dangerous mines. It is alleged … cancelled and the security amount shall stand forfeited in terms of Rule 27 (5) of the Mcr 1960 (Mineral Concession Rules). A copy of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2006

Ashoke Kumar Banerjee and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-22-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1993; Bihar Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishad Act, 1961 - Sections 75(1); Bihar Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishad (Condition of Service) Rules, 1964 - Rules 7(3) to (6), 7 and 9; Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1947; Bihar Panchayat Raj (Amendment) Act, 1993 - Sections 157; Bihar Panchayat Raj (Amendment) Act, 2001; Bihar and Orissa General Clauses Act - Sections 27; Constitution of India (73rd Amendment) Act, 1992; Mines Act, 1923; Mines Act (Amendment) , 1952 - Sections 57; Mines Regulations, 1926

Reported in : [2006(3)JCR171(Jhr)]

present is a case where the Mines Act, 1923 was repealed and was re-enacted with modifications as the Mines Act, 1952 : Section 29 of the 1923 Act empowering the Central Govt. to make regulations consistent with the Act … consistent with the provisions of the repealing Act and if such a rule can be framed under it. Section 27 of the Bihar and Orissa General Clauses Act provides :- where any enactment is repealed and re-enacted by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2006

Hotel Neelkamal, Through Its Prop. Shri Kamal Singh Verma, S/O Shri Am ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-04-2006

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994; Madhya Pradesh Hotel Tatha Vas Grihon Me Vilas Vastuon Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1988 - Sections 6; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 27(6) and 81; Sales Tax Act - Sections 3, 11A, 16, 17, 18, 19, 19A, 20, 21, 22, 22A, 23, 24, 24A, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 33, 33B, 33C, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 42A, 43, 44, 45, 45A, 45B, 46, 47, 47A, 48 and 51; Madhya Pradesh General Clauses Act - Sections 8, 8(1) and 13; Customs Act, 1962; Sea Customs Act, 1878; Indian Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 2; Coal Mines Provident Fund and Bonus Schemes Act, 1948; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Probation Act - Sections 13(2), 18 and 19; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 12; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 360 and 562; Madhya Pradesh Vanijya Kar Adhin

Reported in : (2007)5VST260(MP)

should be construed as references to the definition of 'owner' in Clause (1) of Section 2 of the Mines Act, 1952, which repealed and re-enacted 1923 Act. Consequently, the references to Section 562 of Old Code in Section 19 … the rules made thereunder Sections 3, 17, 18, 19, 19A, 20, 21, 22, 22A, 23, 24, 24A, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 33, 33B, 33C, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 42A, 43, 44,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial