Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: mines act 1952 section 21 · Page 1 of about 1,563 results (0.082 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 14 1980

New Satgram Engineering Works and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-14-1980

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3(1), 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 17(1), 18, 18(1), 18(2), 18(3), 18(4), 18(5), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(3), 19(4), 19(6), 19(7), 20 to 27; Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 - Sections 22(3); Coal Mines Nationalisation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1978; Coal Mines (Taking over of Management) Act, 1973; Coal Mines (Taking over of Management) Ordinance, 1973; Constitution of India - Article 32 and 226; Coal Mines (Conservation, Safety and Development) Act, 1952 - Sections 4; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Coal Mines Provident Fund, Family Pension and Bonus Schemes Act, 1948 - Sections 3C, 20(3), 21, 22, 23, 24, 24-A, 25, 26, 26(1) and 26(5); Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Constitution of India (Thirty ninth Amendment) Ac

Reported in : AIR1981SC124; (1980)4SCC570; [1981]1SCR406

incumbrances. Parliament instead of providing that the word 'mine' shall have the meaning assigned to it in the Mines Act, 1952 has given an enlarged definition of 'mine' in Section 2(h) so that not merely the colliery but everything … shall be restored on his file and shall be dealt with in the manner specified in Section 23. Section 21 provides for priority of claims in relation to arrears of Provident Fund, Pension, Gratuity, etc.36. Section 22 provides

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 1983

Bandhua Mukti Morcha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-16-1983

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 32(1), 32(2), 39, 41, 42, 226 and 256; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XXVI - Order XLVI, Rules 6, 13, 14, 19, 20, 21 and 22; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act; Inter-State Migrant Workmen Rules; Mines Rules, 1955 - Rules 30 to 32; Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 - Sections 2(1), 4, 8, 12 and 21; Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Central Rules, 1980 - Rules 22 to 45; Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 4, 5 and 10 to 15; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Evidence Act; Contract Labour Act - Sections 2(1), 16, 17, 18 and 19; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Central Rules

Reported in : AIR1984SC802; 1984LabIC560; 1983(2)SCALE1151; (1984)3SCC161; [1984]2SCR67; 1984(16)LC29(SC); 1983 (3) SCC 161

employed in the stone quarries. The first statute to which we must refer in this connection is the Mines Act, 1952. This Act extends to the whole of India and therefore applies a fortiorari in the State of Haryana. … Migrant Workmen Act and the Inter-State Migrant Workmen Rules, an inter-State migrant workman is also, by reason of Section 21, entitled to the benefit of the provisions contained in the Workman's Compensation Act 1923. The Payment of Wages

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 1987

East India Coal Company Limited Vs. East Bulliaree/Kendwadih Colliery ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-03-1987

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 10, 12, 20, 21, 23, 24 and 26(3); Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1)(I)

Reported in : AIR1987SC1428; JT1987(1)SC599; 1987(1)SCALE481; (1987)2SCC124; [1987]2SCR484; 1987(1)LC729(SC)

reads as follows:3(n)-'Owner'-(i) When used in relation to a mine, has the meaning assigned to it in the Mines Act, 1952,(ii) When used in relation to a coke oven plant, means any person who is the immediate proprietor of … the first schedule, shall be given by the Central Government, in cash and in the manner specified in Section 21, for vesting in it, under Section 4, the right title and interest of the owner in relation to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 26 2010

Obulapuram Mining Company Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by Its Director, Sri B.V. Sri ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-26-2010

Subject : ConstitutionEnvironment

Acts : Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Section 2; ;Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; ;Pollution (Control) Act; ;Indian Forest Act, 1927; ;Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972; ;Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(1A), 4A, 4A(1), 4A(3), 5 and 21; ;Mines Act, 1952; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Section 3(1); ;Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 27(1), 27(2), 27(5) and 50; ;Metalliferrous Mines Regulations, 1961 - Regulation 111(3); ;Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 32, 73, 162 and 246

Reported in : 2010(2)ALT672

concerned, it is stated in the counter that as per the definition of mine as defined under the Mines Act, 1952, it is evident that the stockyard wherein the mineral is stored comes within the definition of premises of … with the provisions of this Act and the rules made there under.Section 21 deals with the penalties to be imposed on whoever contravenes the provisions … per annum from Lease No. 3. Further, it is having all the statutory clearances including the clearance under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, the clearance under Environment (Protection) Act and the clearance under Pollution (Control)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 1996

M.C. Mehta Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-10-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 - Sections 3 and 17; Constitution of India - Articles 24, 32, 37, 39, 41, 45 and 47; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 67; Plantation Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 24; Merchant Shipping Act, 1951 - Sections 109; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 45; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 - Sections 21; Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 3; Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 - Sections 1(3), 2 and 14; Employment of Children Act, 1938

Reported in : 1996IXAD(SC)582; AIR1997SC699; (1997)3GLR2306; (1997)IILLJ724SC; 1996(9)SCALE42; (1996)6SCC756; [1996]Supp9SCR726; 1997(1)LC243(SC)

and will be in the charge of his father of other adult near male relative.(iv) Section 45 of Mines Act, 1952:(1) No child shall be employed in any mine, nor shall any child be allowed to be present … mine above ground where any operation connected with or incidental to any mining operation is being carried on.(v) Section 21 of Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961:No child shall be required or allowed to work in any capacity in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 06 1997

A. Srirama Babu Vs. the Chief Secretary to the Government of Karnataka ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-06-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 24, 39, 41, 45 and 226; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 6 and 67; Karnataka Electricity Supply Regulations, 1988 - Regulations 7.01 and 8.01; Karnataka Rules - Rule 4; Municipalities Act - Sections 256; Child Labor (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 14, 15 and 18; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 40 and 45; Merchant Shipping Act, 1951 - Sections 109; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1951 - Sections 21; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 3(3); Plantation Labor Act, 1951 - Sections 24; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 - Sections 21; Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 3; Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966 - Sections 24

Reported in : ILR1997KAR2269; 1998(1)KarLJ191

will be in the charge of his father or other adult near male relative'. (iv) Section 45 of Mines Act, 1952:-- '(1) No child shall be employed in any mine, nor shall any child be allowed to be present … above ground where any operation connected with or incidential to any mining operation is being carried on'. (v) Section 21 of Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961:-- 'No child shall be required or allowed to work in any capacity

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2009

Khalid A. Hakim Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Authority Under ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-27-2009

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 - Sections 2, 2(1), 8, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22 and 52(2); Factories Act, 1948; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20; Constitution of India - Article 226, 226(2)

Reported in : (2009)3GLR2065

to them in Clause (j). Clause (1) and Clause (c) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Mines Act, 1952.4.1. In view of the controversy raised in the present petition, it is also relevant to take into … a debt payable by the contractor.4.4. One of the relevant provisions for the purpose of captioned petition, is Section 21 which provides that Inter-State migrant workmen shall be deemed to be in employment 'from date of recruitment for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1960

The State of Orissa Vs. Iswar Das and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-11-1960

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulation, 1926 - Sections 3(1); Constitution of India - Article 20; General Caluses Act - Sections 24

Reported in : AIR1960Ori180; 1960CriLJ1355

by limitation; and (2) the Indian Minos Act, 1923, (Act IV of 1923), having been repealed by the Mines Act, 1952, (Act 35 of 1932), the Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulation which was framed under the 1923 Act was no … and A. C. Adhikari were the agent and manager respectively of the said Company, Under Clause (i) of Section 3 of the Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulation, 1926, the owner, agent, or manager of a mine is to … for the year 1957 not having been filed by the due date 21-1-58, the Chief Inspector of Mines, Dhanbad, issued a reminder on 8-4-58 for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 1997

State Vs. B.M.N. Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-18-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 5(1), 17, 18, 28, 58 and 73; Oil Mines Regulations, 1984 - Regulations 19, 20 and 44; Criminal procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 197, 251, 255 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 120-B, 204, 420, 468 and 471; Oil and Natural Gas Commission Act, 1993 - Sections 28; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(11)

Reported in : 1998(4)ALD13; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)154

: The Inspector of Mines having been appointed by the Central Government purportedly under Section 5(1) of the Mines Act, 1952, filed a complaint against the respondents herein alleging that there was a blow out in the oil well … Cr.P.C. for dropping the proceedings on two grounds namely (1) thatthey are public servants within the meaning ofSection 21 IPC and that sanction forprosecution under Section 197 Cr.P.C. wasnot obtained and (2) that the respondents haveacted in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2006

Vijay Kumar Singh and ors. and Krishna Kamal Prasad @ Krishna Kant Pra ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Nov-14-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 6, 7, 92, 105, 106 and 119; Bihar Factory Rule, 1950 - Rules 3, 3A, 4, 5 and 11; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Bihar Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1972 - Rules 9 and 21

are doing their Mining operation in their lease hold areas for which they are at liberty under the Mines Act, 1952, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 as well as under the BMMC Rules, 1972. Learned Counsel … that on 6.9.1999 a lease deed was executed in Form-D under Rule 21 of Bihar Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1972 in favour of Petitioner No. … at Sasaram, in Official Case Nos. 67/2002 8. 68/2002, whereby cognizance has been taken for the offences under Sections 6 and 7 of the Factory Act punishable under Section 92 of the Factory Act against these Petitioners.4.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial