Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: mines act 1952 section 1 · Page 1 of about 2,778 results (0.126 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 07 1980

industrial Supplies Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-07-1980

Subject : Contract

Acts : Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 4(1), 20(1), 22(3), 22(4) and 26(2); Coal Mines (Conservation, Safety and Development) Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1), 4 and 4(1); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 226(3); Coking Coal Mines (Emergency Provisions) Ordinance, 1971; Coking Coal Mines (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Coal Mines (Conservation and Safety) Rules, 1952 - Rules 49 and 54

Reported in : AIR1980SC1858; [1980(41)FLR248]; (1980)4SCC341; [1981]1SCR375; 1980(12)LC863(SC)

the term 'owner' as defined in Section 3(n) of the Nationalisation Act read with Section 2(1) of the Mines Act, 1952 and that as such the various machinery, plants, equipment and other fixed assets, current assets and movables belonging

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 1997

Regional Director, E.S.i. Corporation Vs. David C.P.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-28-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(12); Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1)

Reported in : (1999)ILLJ941Ker

It is contended in the application that the establishment is a mine in accordance with the provisions of Mines Act, 1952.3. In the narrative of the application, in paragraph 2 it is stated that since April, 1986 there was … covered under the provisions of the Employees' State insurance Scheme because there is a clear exemption provided Under Section 2(12) of the Act. The Insurance Court has reached the conclusion that the establishment cannot be understood to … be insured in the manner provided by the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. By the Impugned order dt. April 6, 1988 in I.C. No. 82/1986,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1996

ichchapur Industrial Cooperative Society Ltd. Vs. Competent Authority, ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-19-1996

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 6(1), 7, 7(1) and 8; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) (Amending) Act, 1977

Reported in : (1998)1CALLT1(SC); (1998)1GLR269; JT1997(1)SC129; 1996(9)SCALE421; (1997)2SCC42; [1996]Supp10SCR416

S. Saghir Ahmad, J.1. Leave granted.2. Water is a mineral within the meaning of Mines Act, 1952 read with Section 2(ba) of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 06 1979

Sri Tarkeshwar Sio Thakur Jiu Vs. Dar Dass Dey and Co. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-06-1979

Subject : Property

Acts : West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 6(1), 27 and 28; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 3, 105, 107 and 108; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Indian Easements Act - Sections 52; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(26)

Reported in : AIR1979SC1669; (1979)3SCC106; [1979]3SCR18

Estates Acquisition Act, 1953, Section 3 of Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957, Section 2 of Mines Act, 1952, Section 52 of Indian Easement Act, 1882 and Section 3 (26) of General Clauses Act, 1897 - appellant who … Sarkaria, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against a judgment, dated March 14, 1969, of the High Court at Calcutta.2. The appellant had the interest of a Darpatnidar in the land

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 1999

Transport Corporation of India Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corpn. a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-05-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 1(5), 2(9), 2(13), 2(17), 3, 15-A, 38, 39, 40, 45-A, 46, 49, 50, 51 and 97; Indian Companies Act, 1956; Mines Act, 1952

Reported in : AIR2000SC238; JT1999(9)SC12; (2000)ILLJ1SC; (2000)1MLJ128(SC); 2000(2)MPHT295; 1999(7)SCALE63; (2000)1SCC332; [1999]Supp4SCR393; 2000(1)LC287(SC); (2000)1UPLBEC1

power or is ordinarily so carried on,but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 or a railway running shed;As noted earlier, the Act, which is a Central Act having all India operation, … notification issued by the State of Andhra Pradesh, in exercise of its powers as an 'appropriate Government' under Section 1(5) of the Act extending the same to road motor transport establishments, cannot by itself, cover the appellant's branch

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2006

South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Customs and Central Ex ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-01-2006

Subject : Excise

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2 and 82; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 5A(1) and 11A; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3(3); Factories Act - Sections 2; Central Excise Rules - Rules 9(1), 9(2), 52A, 53, 173B, 173C, 173G, 174 and 226

Reported in : 2006(200)ELT357(SC); JT2006(7)SC121; 2006(7)SCALE464; (2006)6SCC340

collieries. The Central Government declared this workshop as a mine under the provisions of Section 82 of the Mines Act, 1952 under certificate dated 1.5.1969. Section 2(J)(viii) of the Mines Act states that mine includes 'All workshop situated within

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 1996

Union of India Vs. A.B. Shah and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-09-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 22, 72, 73 and 79; Coal Mines Regulations, 1957 - Regulation 100(1); Consumers Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1996SC3281; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)15; 1996(2)Crimes181(SC); JT1996(5)SC128; 1996(4)SCALE307; (1996)8SCC540; [1996]Supp2SCR620

Bench), this appeal is filed by special leave.2. The appellant preferred a complaint under Section 73 of the Mines Act 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') read with Regulation No. 100(1) of the Coal Mines Regulations 1957 (hereinafter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 1979

Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. Vs. Bharat Mining Corporation ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-20-1979

Subject : Contract

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 4; Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 - Sections 3(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73; Coal Mines (Taking over of Management) Ordinance, 1973; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 8, Rule 5 and 5(2) - Order 40, Rule 1; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1)(1), 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 26 and 29; Coal Mines (Conservation, Safety and Development) Act, 1952; Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972; Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1974

Reported in : AIR1980Bom168

also referred to the definition of the word 'owner' as defined in Section 2 (1) (1) of the Mines Act, 1952, and submitted that the word 'owner' is not used as owner of the articles under the definition of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2009

Central Coalfields Ltd. Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-19-2009

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2(K) and 9; Factories (Amendment) Act, 1976; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1); Coal Nationalization Act - Sections 2 and 3; Central Excise Act; Bihar Factories Rules

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR2139; (2009)IVLLJ774Jhar

or is ordinarily so carried on, but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952), or a mobile unit belonging to the armed forces of the union, a railway running … when it was situated within the mining area.4. The respondents in their counter affidavit have submitted that under Section 9 of the Factories Act, 1948 the inspector of Factories was empowered to inspect the place and examine … writ, order or direction for quashing the letters dated 23.5.1998, 7.4.1999 and 19.4.1999 issued by the respondent No. 2 whereby and whereunder the respondent No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2007

Umesh Prasad Singh Vs. Coal India Limited Through Its Chairman-cum-m.D ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-18-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 52(1) and 52(10)

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR2428; [2007(4)JCR200(Jhr)]

are dismissed.However, in the facts and circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to cost. Mines Act, 1952, Section 52(1)-Leave encashment Scheme para 7.1-Claiming benefit under-Leave Encashment Scheme-Petitioner-Resigned on 4.5.1999-Claimed for payment of wages in lien 146

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial