Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: mines act 1952 chapter viii · Page 1 of about 546 results (0.065 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 20 1959

K.T. Rolling Mills Private Ltd. and anr. Vs. M.R. Meher and ors. Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-20-1959

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 7, 7A, 7B, 10, 10(1), 12, 12(5), 15, 25A, 25A(1), 25B, 25C, 25C(1), 25D, 25E, 25J, 25J(1), 25J(2) and 27C; Constitution of India - Article 226; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Plantation Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 2; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1953 - Sections 1(2); Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 98

Reported in : AIR1963Bom146; (1962)64BOMLR645; (1962)IILLJ667Bom

Factories Act, 1948 (LXIII of 1948);or(ii) a mine as defined in Clause (j) of Section 2 of the Mines Act, 1952 (XXXV of 1952); or(iii) a plantation as defined in Clause (f) of Section 2 of the Plantation Labour … of the Industrial Disputes Act. The Tribunal held that the workmen were not entitled to ,ay-off compensation under Chapter VA of the Industrial Disputes Act, but having regard to all the facts and circumstances and the financial

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 1997

State Vs. B.M.N. Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-18-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 5(1), 17, 18, 28, 58 and 73; Oil Mines Regulations, 1984 - Regulations 19, 20 and 44; Criminal procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 197, 251, 255 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 120-B, 204, 420, 468 and 471; Oil and Natural Gas Commission Act, 1993 - Sections 28; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(11)

Reported in : 1998(4)ALD13; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)154

: The Inspector of Mines having been appointed by the Central Government purportedly under Section 5(1) of the Mines Act, 1952, filed a complaint against the respondents herein alleging that there was a blow out in the oil well … contemplated by Section 255 Cr.P.C. without recording the evidence of prosecution and following the procedure laid down in Chapter XX of Cr.P.C. is illegal and liable to be set aside. He filed a copy of the enquiry

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 1995

M/S. Shriram Industrial Enterprises Ltd. Vs. the Union of India and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-13-1995

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 2 to 4, 19(1), 133, 133(1), 226, 245 to 254, 246, 246(1), (2) and (3), 301, 366(12), 369; Uttar Pradesh Act, 1964 - Sections 24-A and 24-B; Uttar Pradesh Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 7,8 and 10; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 18G and 184; Parliamentary Act; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rules 2 and 3; Civil Procedure (Amendment) Code, 1908 - Sections 2(2) and (9), 28, 33 and 96; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1882 - Sections 575; Molasses Control Order, 1961; Ethyl Alcohol (Price Control) Order, 1971; Uttar Pradesh Molasses Act, 1947; United provinces Molasses (Control) Act, 1947; Government of India Act, 1935; India (Central Government and Legislature) Act, 1946 - Sections 2 and

Reported in : AIR1996All135

1964)? 75. Let the papers be laid before Hon'ble the Chief Justice for necessary orders in view of Chapter VIII, Section B, Rule 3 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952.Sd/- Om Prakash, J.Sd/- R.R.K. Trivedi, J.List before … Seventh Schedule. It is to be noted here that these cases referred to below relate to Regulation on Mines and Mineral Development. The first case strongly relied upon by learned counsel for the petitioner is the decision … competence of State Legislature to enact U.P. Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam 1964 (U.P. Act No. XXIV of 1964) (in short, the Adhiniyam) have referred the following

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 03 1991

Neyveli Lignite Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-03-1991

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1992)(58)ELT76TriDel

contended in this show cause notice that according to Col. X of Clause (j) of Section 2 of Mines Act, 1952, a 'mine' includes premises or part of the premises thereof, in or adjacent to and belonging to a … the ultimate product which comes out from the B & C plant i.e lignite coke was classified under Chapter heading 2702.00 and it was entitled for exemption from payment of duty under Notification No. 179/85, dated 1-8-1985. … briquette chips, this is a semi coke product having been dried to 8% - 11% from 54% and carried out pressurising the lignite and the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 1996

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Vs. Madanlal Agrawal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-20-1996

Subject : Commercial Tenancy

Acts : Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3, 12 and 26; Coking Coal Mines (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1971

Reported in : 1996IXAD(SC)415; AIR1997SC1599; 1997(1)BLJR569; JT1996(10)SC584; 1996(8)SCALE472; (1997)1SCC177; [1996]Supp8SCR886

and 'Owner' were given the same meaning as in Section 3 of the Indian Mines Act, 1923.10. The Mines Act, 1952 came into force on 1st July, 1952. It dealt with mines generally. 'Mine' was defined by Section 2(j) … of the Schedule shall be given by the Central Government, in cash and in the manner specified in Chapter VI for the vesting in it, under Section 3, of the right, title and interest of the owner … named in the Schedule, other persons may have to be compensated. Sections 8 of the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act lays down that the 'owner of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 1996

M.C. Mehta Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-10-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 - Sections 3 and 17; Constitution of India - Articles 24, 32, 37, 39, 41, 45 and 47; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 67; Plantation Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 24; Merchant Shipping Act, 1951 - Sections 109; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 45; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 - Sections 21; Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 3; Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 - Sections 1(3), 2 and 14; Employment of Children Act, 1938

Reported in : 1996IXAD(SC)582; AIR1997SC699; (1997)3GLR2306; (1997)IILLJ724SC; 1996(9)SCALE42; (1996)6SCC756; [1996]Supp9SCR726; 1997(1)LC243(SC)

and will be in the charge of his father of other adult near male relative.(iv) Section 45 of Mines Act, 1952:(1) No child shall be employed in any mine, nor shall any child be allowed to be present … conditions and measures taken to mitigate the sufferings of the child labour and has made various recommendations in Chapter XI of its report. We also have a work of Collector of Kamarajar District titled 'Integrated Project for … of Workers Workers Child Workers to total workers Slate Mandsaur, 12,000 1,000 8.3 Pencil Madhya Pradesh State Markapur 15,000 app. 3750 25 Andhra Pradesh Diamond

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2011

Shyam Bahadur Sakhya Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-29-2011

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Section 3, Sub-section (2), Clause (v); MMDR Act - Section 15; Environmental Protection Rules - Rule 5 (3)

your Government under Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.22. Parliament enacted The Mines Act, 1952 with an object to regulate the mining operations of natural resources. Minerals has been defined under Section 2 … 53 of the said judgment is also relevant, which reads as under:-53. Rule 31 to 41 contained in Chapter V of the Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, 1988 framed under Section 18 of MMRD Act deal with … is in teeth of the Honble Supreme Courts judgments dated 18.3.2004 and 8.5.2009 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 4677 of 1985 (M.C. Mehta vs. Union

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1974

B.M. Lakshmanamurthy Vs. the Employees' State Insurance Corporation, B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-21-1974

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(9), 2(13) and 2(17)

Reported in : AIR1974SC759; [1974(28)FLR223]; (1974)ILLJ304SC; (1974)4SCC365; [1974]3SCR142

or is ordinarily so carried on. But does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 or a railway running shed.* * *9. By Section 2(13) 'immediate employer', in relation to employees employed by … Insurance Court if it involves a substantial question of law. -23. Chapter VII provides for different penalties.24. Under Chapter VIII (Miscellaneous), Section 94 provides, inter-alia, that contributions due to the Corporation shall 'have priority over all other debts.25.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2019

The State of Meghalaya Vs. All Dimasa Students Union Hasao District Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-03-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

Meghalaya. He, however, submits that there are no powers with the District Magistrate or State Officials under the Mines Act, 1952. Chapter II of the Mines Act, 1952 deals with Inspectors and Certifying Surgeons. Section 5(3) provided that the District … and has not only resulted in degradation of environment, particularly the streams and underground water, but has also 8 seriously jeopardised the human health. It was further noticed that Transportation of coal in an illegal, unregulated, indiscriminate

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 1974

inder Sen Roy Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-12-1974

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act 1948 - Sections 2, 6, 7, 92, 93, 94, 100, 100(1), 100(2), 101, 112 and 113

Reported in : (1975)ILLJ359Bom

occupier for the purpose of Chapter X. 11. In this connection, a reference to S. 76 of the Mines Act, 1952, as it stood before it was substituted by S. 41 of the amending Act No. 62 of 1959, … in sub-s. (2) of S. 100 is understood in its ordinary disjunctive sense, the sub-section becomes quite clear. 8. Thirdly, if the word 'company' is interpreted to mean private company also, the result in the case of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial