Advanced Search Results

Ritz Private Limited Vs. Lal Bavta Hotel Aur Bakery Mazdoor Union and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25N and 25O; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28(1)

Reported in : [1999(81)FLR524]; (1999)IILLJ255Bom

are not included. This is preceded by an exclusion of a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952).13. I deliberately deal separately with these two provisions because apparently the learned Industrial Court was … 1991 came to be filed by the 1st Respondent-union on behalf of the employee-workman to challenge breach of Chapter V-B Sections 25-N, 25N(c) and 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and also under Section 28(1), items

Bhagirath Kanoria and ors. Vs. State of M. P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalLabour and Industrial

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468, 468 (2), 472 and 473

Reported in : AIR1984SC1688; (1984)3CompLJ49(SC); 1984(2)Crimes441(SC); [1984(49)FLR382]; 1984(2)SCALE218; (1984)4SCC222; [1985]1SCR626

each year. Failure to forward the returns as required is punishable with fine Under Section 66 of the Mines Act, 1952. The respondents having failed to furnish the returns by the due date, which was January 21, 1960 a … the employer's contribution of the Provident Fund is a continuing offence, arises because of the provisions contained in Chapter XXXVI of the Code which is entitled 'Limitation for taking cognizance of certain offences.' Sections 468, 472 and

Chandra Spinning and Weaving Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Companie ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : [1990]69CompCas117(Kar); ILR1988KAR149

21 in each year. Failure to forward the returns as required is punishable under Section 66 of the Mines Act, 1952. On the failure of the respondents to furnish the returns by the due date, a complaint had been … the requirements of Section 220(1) of the Act is punishable only with fine.25. By the new provisions in Chapter XXXVI of the Code, limitation has been prescribed for the first time for launching criminal prosecution in regard

The State of Meghalaya Vs. All Dimasa Students Union Hasao District Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Meghalaya. He, however, submits that there are no powers with the District Magistrate or State Officials under the Mines Act, 1952. Chapter II of the Mines Act, 1952 deals with Inspectors and Certifying Surgeons. Section 5(3) provided that the District

K.T. Rolling Mills (Private), Ltd. Vs. Meher M.R. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2A, 7, 7A, 7B, 10, 10(1), 12, 12(5), 15, 25(E), 25(C), 25A, 25A(1), 25B, 25C, 25D, 25E, 25J, 25J(1) and 25J(2); Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; The Plantations Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 2

Reported in : (1962)IILLJ667Bom

the Factories Act, 1948; or (ii) a mine as defined in Clause (j) of S. 2 of the Mines Act, 1952 : or (iii) a plantation as defined in Clause (f) of S. 2 of the Plantation Labour Act, … liabilities of the employer and workmen are nevertheless to be determined in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. I am unable to accede to this argument. Sub-section (2) is a declaratory enactment and it is an accepted

The India Cements Limited Represented by Its Managing Director Vs. Dir ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2001)3MLJ484

of the mines attached to the respective cement manufacturing units for the purpose of Section 76 of the Mines Act 1952. the brief facts leading to the writ petition may be summarized as follows.2. The petitioner namely The India … amendment Act of 1987 which inter alia amended Section 2(n) and deleted Section 100 by inserting Section 7-A, Chapter IV-A, Section 104-A and Section 106-A, besides certain other provisions. The Supreme Court taking note of the provisions

Neyveli Lignite Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1992)(58)ELT76TriDel

contended in this show cause notice that according to Col. X of Clause (j) of Section 2 of Mines Act, 1952, a 'mine' includes premises or part of the premises thereof, in or adjacent to and belonging to a … the ultimate product which comes out from the B & C plant i.e lignite coke was classified under Chapter heading 2702.00 and it was entitled for exemption from payment of duty under Notification No. 179/85, dated 1-8-1985.

South Eastern Coal Fields Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

(m) (ii) of the Factories Act which defined 'factory' by excluding a mine subject to the operation of Mines Act, 1952, held that the benefit of the said notification No. 63/95 was not available to the goods in question … 1. The appellant is manufacturing excisable goods falling under Chapter 84 of the first schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act 1985. Show cause notices were issued to

industrial Supplies Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contract

Acts : Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 4(1), 20(1), 22(3), 22(4) and 26(2); Coal Mines (Conservation, Safety and Development) Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1), 4 and 4(1); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 226(3); Coking Coal Mines (Emergency Provisions) Ordinance, 1971; Coking Coal Mines (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Coal Mines (Conservation and Safety) Rules, 1952 - Rules 49 and 54

Reported in : AIR1980SC1858; [1980(41)FLR248]; (1980)4SCC341; [1981]1SCR375; 1980(12)LC863(SC)

the term 'owner' as defined in Section 3(n) of the Nationalisation Act read with Section 2(1) of the Mines Act, 1952 and that as such the various machinery, plants, equipment and other fixed assets, current assets and movables belonging … the meaning, respectively, assigned to them 'unless the context otherwise requires'. The expression 'managing contractor' finds place in Chapter VI, which deals with the power, functions and duties of the Commissioner of Payments appointed under Sub-section (1)

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Vs. Madanlal Agrawal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial Tenancy

Acts : Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3, 12 and 26; Coking Coal Mines (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1971

Reported in : 1996IXAD(SC)415; AIR1997SC1599; 1997(1)BLJR569; JT1996(10)SC584; 1996(8)SCALE472; (1997)1SCC177; [1996]Supp8SCR886

and 'Owner' were given the same meaning as in Section 3 of the Indian Mines Act, 1923.10. The Mines Act, 1952 came into force on 1st July, 1952. It dealt with mines generally. 'Mine' was defined by Section 2(j) … of the Schedule shall be given by the Central Government, in cash and in the manner specified in Chapter VI for the vesting in it, under Section 3, of the right, title and interest of the owner