Advanced Search Results

Ritz Private Limited Vs. Lal Bavta Hotel Aur Bakery Mazdoor Union and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25N and 25O; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28(1)

Reported in : [1999(81)FLR524]; (1999)IILLJ255Bom

are not included. This is preceded by an exclusion of a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952).13. I deliberately deal separately with these two provisions because apparently the learned Industrial Court was … 1991 came to be filed by the 1st Respondent-union on behalf of the employee-workman to challenge breach of Chapter V-B Sections 25-N, 25N(c) and 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and also under Section 28(1), items … Court, Maharashtra, Mumbai in compliant (ULP) No. 1666 of 1991 on November 29, 1996. The petitioner-employer is running a hotel viz. Ritz Hotel, and Respondent

Chandra Spinning and Weaving Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Companie ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : [1990]69CompCas117(Kar); ILR1988KAR149

21 in each year. Failure to forward the returns as required is punishable under Section 66 of the Mines Act, 1952. On the failure of the respondents to furnish the returns by the due date, a complaint had been … the requirements of Section 220(1) of the Act is punishable only with fine.25. By the new provisions in Chapter XXXVI of the Code, limitation has been prescribed for the first time for launching criminal prosecution in regard … Director Sri M. Krishnamoorthy (Petitioner No. 1), Sri M. Krishnamoorthy (Petitioner No. 2) and Sri M. Nagaraj (Petitioner No. 3) - the Directors of the

The State of Meghalaya Vs. All Dimasa Students Union Hasao District Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Meghalaya. He, however, submits that there are no powers with the District Magistrate or State Officials under the Mines Act, 1952. Chapter II of the Mines Act, 1952 deals with Inspectors and Certifying Surgeons. Section 5(3) provided that the District … of lives but damaged the environment of the area. Details of appeals 3. Civil Appeal Nos. 10720 of 2018, 10611 of 2018 and 10907 of 2018 have been filed against order dated 31.08.2018 passed by the National

Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. Vs. Bharat Mining Corporation ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 4; Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 - Sections 3(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73; Coal Mines (Taking over of Management) Ordinance, 1973; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 8, Rule 5 and 5(2) - Order 40, Rule 1; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1)(1), 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 26 and 29; Coal Mines (Conservation, Safety and Development) Act, 1952; Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972; Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1974

Reported in : AIR1980Bom168

also referred to the definition of the word 'owner' as defined in Section 2 (1) (1) of the Mines Act, 1952, and submitted that the word 'owner' is not used as owner of the articles under the definition of … hand, Mr. Joshi contended that having regard to the preamble of the said Act and the heading of Chapter II and the provisions of Section 3(1), what can be acquired is the right, title and interest of

Santuram Khudai Vs. Kimatrai Printers and Processors Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationLabour and Industrial

Acts : Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 27A, 30, 32, 33 and 80; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR1978SC202; [1978(36)FLR82]; (1978)0GLR259; 1978LabIC1; (1978)ILLJ174SC; (1978)1SCC162; [1978]2SCR387; 1978(10)LC13(SC)

of the 1952 Act within the meaning of s. 73 of the Act. Under s. 18(1) of the Mines Act, 1952, the manager, the agent and the owner are responsible for observance of the Mines Creche Rules which form … affected by the dispute, in the manner provided by rules under section' 85. Subject to the provisions of Chapter V, the Labour Court may permit the parties so affected to appear in the manner provided by the … No. 1845 of 1976 filed by the appellant and another under Article 227 of the Constitution raises an interesting question regarding the right of individual

Hindustan Unilever Limited Vs. Member, Industrial Court and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

of 1948). (ii) a mine as defined in clause (j) of sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952); or (iii) a plantation as defined in clause (f) of Section 2 of the Plantations … PULP Act. Hence, the jurisdiction of the Industrial Court was rightly invoked by the complainant-Union. (D) Application of Chapter V-A of the ID Act and Section 25-FFF or Chapter V-B of the said Act and Section 25-O

K.T. Rolling Mills (Private), Ltd. Vs. Meher M.R. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2A, 7, 7A, 7B, 10, 10(1), 12, 12(5), 15, 25(E), 25(C), 25A, 25A(1), 25B, 25C, 25D, 25E, 25J, 25J(1) and 25J(2); Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; The Plantations Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 2

Reported in : (1962)IILLJ667Bom

the Factories Act, 1948; or (ii) a mine as defined in Clause (j) of S. 2 of the Mines Act, 1952 : or (iii) a plantation as defined in Clause (f) of S. 2 of the Plantation Labour Act, … the workmen. Against the order passed by Mr. Justice K. T. Desai this appeal has been preferred. 4. Chapter VA and certain consequential amendments were introduced in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, by the Industrial Disputes (Amendment)

Welcomgroup Searock Vs. Searock Hotel Employees' Union and Anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 9A, 10, 25F, 25G, 25H, 25K, 25L and 25N; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1); Plantations Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 2; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(12)

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR74; 2006(2)BomCR899; [2005(106)FLR692]; (2005)IIILLJ483Bom; 2005(3)MhLj191

of 1948); (ii) a mine as defined in clause (j) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952); or (iii) a plantation as defined in clause (f) of section 2 of the Plantations … breach of Section 25-H. Having said this, the Industrial Tribunal came to the conclusion that the provisions of Chapter V-B of the Act were attracted in the case of the Petitioner and since, more than 100 persons

Bhagirath Kanoria and ors. Vs. State of M. P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalLabour and Industrial

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468, 468 (2), 472 and 473

Reported in : AIR1984SC1688; (1984)3CompLJ49(SC); 1984(2)Crimes441(SC); [1984(49)FLR382]; 1984(2)SCALE218; (1984)4SCC222; [1985]1SCR626

each year. Failure to forward the returns as required is punishable with fine Under Section 66 of the Mines Act, 1952. The respondents having failed to furnish the returns by the due date, which was January 21, 1960 a … the employer's contribution of the Provident Fund is a continuing offence, arises because of the provisions contained in Chapter XXXVI of the Code which is entitled 'Limitation for taking cognizance of certain offences.' Sections 468, 472 and … these cases which comprises Criminal Appeals Nos. 407-418 of 1979.3. On August 22, 1975 the Provident Fund Inspector, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, filed six complaints against

Common Cause Vs. Union of India .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

areas and direct prosecution and punish all those found guilty of this illegal mining in violation of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) 1 W.P. No.202 of 1995 W.P. (C) Nos. 114/2014 etc. Page 2 of … by Justice M.B. Shah, a retired judge of this Court, holding a commission under the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 a writ petition being W.P. (C) No.114 of 2014 was filed by Common Cause. Several prayers were made … 114/2014 etc. Page 27 of 114 47. Similarly, on page 125 of Chapter II of Volume I of the report, it is stated as follows:-