Advanced Search Results

Nbcc (India) Ltd. versus the State of West Bengal & Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]1S.C.R.610; (2025) 3 SCC 440; 2025INSC 54; MANU/SC/0061/2025

an MSME cannot make a reference to the Facilitation Council for dispute resolution under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 if it is not registered under Section 8 of the 2006 Act before the execution of the contract … 6 SCC 401 - distinguished. Kone Elevator India Private Limited v. State of Tamil Nadu [2014] 5 SCR 912 : (2014) 7 SCC 1; Shanti Conductors Private Ltd. v. Assam State Electricity Board [2019] 1 SCR 489

Refex Energy Limited, by its Managing Director Vs. Union of India, by ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

petition fails and is hereby dismissed, with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, the connected WMP is closed. Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 Section 15, Section 16, Section 17, Section 18, Section 19, Section 20, Section 21, Section 22, Section 23, Section … 52 of the List I of the VII Schedule of the constitution and only the states are competent. 9. Entry 52 of List I reads as follows:- 52. industries, the control of which by the Union is

Ms Bharat Coking Coal Limited Through Sri Jai Prakash Gupta Vs. The St ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service Tax

Dadel Director of Industries cum Chairman­JMSMEFC) JHARKHAND MICRO SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES FACILITATOIN COUNCIL (Established U/S 20 of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act­2006) 3rd Floor, Nepal House, Doranda, Ranchi­834002, Jharkhand Case no. JHSEFC­03/2011 M/s. C. K. Industries, Matkuria Road, Dhanbad … Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council (hereinafter referred to as Facilitation Council 'in short') in terms of Section 18 of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council Act, 2006 raising a claim for payment of outstanding … of supplies were were made or refused. In the facts of the 9. case of the applicant, it was required to render a finding as

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited and Others ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

be refunded by the Office of the Prothonotary to the Petitioners. The Office to number the petition forthwith. Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 Section 16 Section 18(3) Validity of award Petitioner challenged award passed by the Arbitral Tribunal-Council, under Section 18(3) of … submitted by the Respondent from time to time in respect of the same. 2.3 By its letter dated 9 June 2004, the Respondent for the first time raised its claim for interest on delayed payments on the

M/s. Pro Knits Vs. The Board Of Directors Of Canara Bank

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

batch of Appeals, who claim themselves to be the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) registered under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the “MSMED Act”), have challenged the impugned common order dated 11.01.2024 passed by the … the Notification dated 29th May, 2015 by the Ministry of MSME, in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 9 of the MSMED Act. According to him, it was incumbent on the part of the Respondents Banks/ NBFCs

The Block Development Officer vs Abraham Kuriakose

Court : Kerala

at three times of bank rate notified by the Reserve Bank as provided under Section 16 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 from 22.10.2019 till the date of realization of the award. The legality and correctness of the said award

Apm Air Cargo Terminal Services & Anr. Vs.celebi Delhi Cargo Termi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

namely APM Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. which is duly registered under the O.M.P.(I) (COMM) 204/2019 Page 1 of 22 Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006. Respondent no.1 namely Celebi Delhi Cargo Terminal Management India Pvt. Ltd. has been awarded tender by the Delhi … V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, whereby they are seeking directions against the respondent no.1 not to

Satheesh V.K. versus the Federal Bank Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1255

from Notification dated 29th May, 2015 issued by the Central Government in terms of Section 9 of the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 and that the respondent had acted illegally in not extending the benefit of such notification to the appellant.14.

M/s. Ravindranath GE Medicate Associate Private Limited Vs. M/s. Clean ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

disposed of. d) There shall be no order as to costs. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 Section 18, Section 19 Validity of Award Council made award directing appellant to pay principal amount to respondent Appellant … the purpose of deciding this appeal are as under:- 2. The appellant had issued a work order dated 9th January 2008 to the respondent for Epoxy flooring, coving, hygiene PU wall coating and other specialty coating at

M/s. Silpi Industries Vs. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Undertakings Act, 1993 (for short, ‗IDPASC Act‘)]. presently under the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council constituted under Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‗the MSMED Act‘). The earlier IDPASC Act was replaced by MSMED Act and earlier … The Central Government may seek the advice of the Advisory Committee on any of the matters specified in section 9, 10, 11, 12 or 14 of Chapter IV. (7) The State Government may seek advice of the Advisory