Advanced Search Results

The Indur District Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd. Vs. M/s. Microp ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Nos.13/EFC/2011/120 and 13/EFC/2011/119 respectively by declaring that the claims therein did not fall within the ambit of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (for brevity, the Act of 2006'). By individual interim orders dated 21.11.2012 passed in W.P.Nos.35872 and 35879 of … of such memorandum and it is not mandatory. Delayed payments to micro and small enterprisesis dealt with in Chapter V of the Act of 2006. Section 15 in this Chapter states that where a supplier supplies goods … PRIVATE LIMITED V/s. ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD (2012) 7 Supreme Court Cases 462) in the context of the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale

Shreyas Marketing vs Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council

Court : Kerala

the 1st respondent, the Facilitation Council established by the Karnataka State Government as per Section 21 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (in short, “Act 2006”). The allegation in Ext.P1 is that the petitioner has failed to make payment of … the writ petition.6. To consider the issue involved, it is profitable to scan throughthe relevant provisions of the Act, 2006. Chapter V deals with delayed payments to micro and small enterprises. Section 15 mandates that when a supplier, supplies … ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL MSEFC BANGALORE, DIRECTORATE OF MICRO, SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISED, 49, KHANIJA BHAVAN, SOUTH BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA, PIN

M/s. Silpi Industries Vs. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Undertakings Act, 1993 (for short, ‗IDPASC Act‘)]. presently under the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council constituted under Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‗the MSMED Act‘). The earlier IDPASC Act was replaced by MSMED Act and earlier … by the Central Government, namely, National Board for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. The ‗enterprises‘ were classified under Chapter III of the 2006 Act into micro, small and medium enterprises. Liability of buyer and the mechanism in … to maintainability of counter claim, the High Court has held that in 4 C.A.Nos.1570-1578 of 2021 etc. view of Section 23(2A) of the 1996 Act,

The Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited and Another Vs. U ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Arbitration

reference to their ranking before the Facilitation Council. 3. Three applications were filed under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (for short ‘Micro Act’). Respondent No.2 therein i.e., the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (for short hereinafter referred … to be noticed that the proceedings were initiated by the applicants under the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Act, 2006. Chapter V of the said enactment is referable to delayed payments to Micro and Small Enterprises. Section 16 of … 01.05.2001 and had offered to supply 1000 kw of weasel conductors and 4000kw rabbit at the price indicated in the said offer. Suffice it to

M/S Harcharan Dass Gupta versus Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]6S.C.R.422

May 2025 [Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha* and Joymalya Bagchi, JJ.] Issue for Consideration In a case covered under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (Development) Act, 2006, whether the High Court erred in holding that the Delhi Arbitration Centre lacked jurisdiction to conduct arbitral proceedings … 2006 and the unambiguous expressions used therein, this Court has no hesitation in holding that the provisions of Chapter V of the MsMed Act, 2006 have an effect overriding the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1996 .” … [2025] 6 S.C.R. 422 : 2025 INSC 689 M/s Harcharan Dass Gupta v. Union of India

B.H.P. Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Director, Industries, U.P. (Facilitatio ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2009All155

respondents.2. Petitioner before this Court is a private small scale industrial unit covered under the provisions of the Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act, 2006'). Petitioner is engaged in manufacturers of, engineering equipments and is stated … council to consider and decide the references made under Section 18 of Act, 27/2006 which is evident from chapter V of the said Act, section 17 specifically deals with recovery of amount due to the Micro, Small … Council constituted under Act, 2006 and an award has been made on 4th December, 2008 in favour of respondent No. 3, wherein a total sum

State Water and Sanitation Mission, Err Vs. The a.P. Micro and Small E ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

the State Government, in exercise of the power available under Section 20 read with Section 21 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (henceforth referred to as the Act).The Parliament has noticed that small-scale industry is facing lots of difficulties to … Act provided for various measures for promotion, development and enhancement of competitiveness of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. Chapter V dealt with the delayed payments to Micro and Small Enterprises. Section 15 of the Act has thrust … can be developed duly enhancing their competitiveness with rest of the entrepreneuRs.Chapter IV of this Act provided for various measures for promotion, development and enhancement

Ms Bharat Coking Coal Limited Through Sri Jai Prakash Gupta Vs. The St ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service Tax

Dadel Director of Industries cum Chairman­JMSMEFC) JHARKHAND MICRO SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES FACILITATOIN COUNCIL (Established U/S 20 of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act­2006) 3rd Floor, Nepal House, Doranda, Ranchi­834002, Jharkhand Case no. JHSEFC­03/2011 M/s. C. K. Industries, Matkuria Road, Dhanbad … it by the impugned Award. It has justified the procedure adopted by the Facilitation Council in terms of Chapter­V of the Act of 2006 by adjudicating the matter on merits. 3. Respondent no. 3, in its counter … Rs. 50,053.00/­. The date of bills are distributed over a period of 4 years starting from 28th March, 2005 till 28th July, 2009. The opposite

Principal Chief Engineer Vs. Manibhai and Brothers (Sleeper) and Anoth ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Arbitration

the petitioner) dated 21-08-2010, passed by the State Level Industry Facilitation Council, constituted under Section 21 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (“MSMED Act” for short). 3. The brief factual background of the case, as garnered from the Memorandum of … of the same, it would be fruitful to advert to the relevant provisions of the MSMED Act. 7.1 Chapter V of the MSMED Act, is titled “Delayed Payments To Micro And Small Enterprises”, and comprises of Sections … dispute for Arbitration to itself, and rendered the impugned Award, dated 21-8-2010. 4. Before the petition could be heard on merits, Mr.Paresh M.Dave, learned counsel

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs Adarsh Nobel Corporation Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Orissa at Cuttack, by way of the petition bearing MSEFC Case No. 56/2022, under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (“MSMED Act”). VI. The MSEF Council passed an arbitral award dated 10th July, 2023, thereby, directing the petitioner … enacting the MSMED Act, 2006 would get frustrated. xxx 52. The upshot of the above is that: 52.1. Chapter V of the MSMED Act, 2006 would override the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1996. 52.2. No party … way of the said communication, the petitioner claimed provisional liability of Rs. 4,88,06,932.83/-, against risk and expense recovery, from the respondent. V. In response to