Advanced Search Results

B.H.P. Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Director, Industries, U.P. (Facilitatio ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2009All155

respondents.2. Petitioner before this Court is a private small scale industrial unit covered under the provisions of the Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act, 2006'). Petitioner is engaged in manufacturers of, engineering equipments and is stated … council to consider and decide the references made under Section 18 of Act, 27/2006 which is evident from chapter V of the said Act, section 17 specifically deals with recovery of amount due to the Micro, Small

Shreyas Marketing vs Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council

Court : Kerala

the 1st respondent, the Facilitation Council established by the Karnataka State Government as per Section 21 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (in short, “Act 2006”). The allegation in Ext.P1 is that the petitioner has failed to make payment of … the writ petition.6. To consider the issue involved, it is profitable to scan throughthe relevant provisions of the Act, 2006. Chapter V deals with delayed payments to micro and small enterprises. Section 15 mandates that when a supplier, supplies … ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 22ND JYAISHTA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 3327 OF 2021 PETITIONER: M/S.SHREYAS MARKETING,

M/s. Silpi Industries Vs. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Undertakings Act, 1993 (for short, ‗IDPASC Act‘)]. presently under the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council constituted under Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‗the MSMED Act‘). The earlier IDPASC Act was replaced by MSMED Act and earlier … by the Central Government, namely, National Board for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. The ‗enterprises‘ were classified under Chapter III of the 2006 Act into micro, small and medium enterprises. Liability of buyer and the mechanism in … C.A.Nos.1570-1578 of 2021 etc. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL

Lifecare Innovations Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. versus Union of India & ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]2S.C.R.727

2021) 25 February 2025 [Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha* and Sandeep Mehta, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Issue arose whether the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, coupled with the Public Procurement Policy for Micro and Small Enterprises Order 2012 mandate procurement of 25 percent … [2025] 2 S.C.R. 727 : 2025 INSC 269 Lifecare Innovations Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

The Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited and Another Vs. U ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Arbitration

reference to their ranking before the Facilitation Council. 3. Three applications were filed under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (for short ‘Micro Act’). Respondent No.2 therein i.e., the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (for short hereinafter referred … to be noticed that the proceedings were initiated by the applicants under the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Act, 2006. Chapter V of the said enactment is referable to delayed payments to Micro and Small Enterprises. Section 16 of

M/S Harcharan Dass Gupta versus Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]6S.C.R.422

May 2025 [Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha* and Joymalya Bagchi, JJ.] Issue for Consideration In a case covered under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (Development) Act, 2006, whether the High Court erred in holding that the Delhi Arbitration Centre lacked jurisdiction to conduct arbitral proceedings … 2006 and the unambiguous expressions used therein, this Court has no hesitation in holding that the provisions of Chapter V of the MsMed Act, 2006 have an effect overriding the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1996 .” … [2025] 6 S.C.R. 422 : 2025 INSC 689 M/s Harcharan Dass Gupta v. Union of India (Civil Appeal

Ms Bharat Coking Coal Limited Through Sri Jai Prakash Gupta Vs. The St ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service Tax

Dadel Director of Industries cum Chairman­JMSMEFC) JHARKHAND MICRO SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES FACILITATOIN COUNCIL (Established U/S 20 of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act­2006) 3rd Floor, Nepal House, Doranda, Ranchi­834002, Jharkhand Case no. JHSEFC­03/2011 M/s. C. K. Industries, Matkuria Road, Dhanbad … it by the impugned Award. It has justified the procedure adopted by the Facilitation Council in terms of Chapter­V of the Act of 2006 by adjudicating the matter on merits. 3. Respondent no. 3, in its counter … HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 6464 of 2012 ­­­ M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Dhanbad ..... Petitioner Versus 1. The

Principal Chief Engineer Vs. Manibhai and Brothers (Sleeper) and Anoth ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Arbitration

the petitioner) dated 21-08-2010, passed by the State Level Industry Facilitation Council, constituted under Section 21 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (“MSMED Act” for short). 3. The brief factual background of the case, as garnered from the Memorandum of … of the same, it would be fruitful to advert to the relevant provisions of the MSMED Act. 7.1 Chapter V of the MSMED Act, is titled “Delayed Payments To Micro And Small Enterprises”, and comprises of Sections … Assistant Government Pleader, waives service of notice of Rule, for respondent No.2. 2. The challenge in this petition, preferred under Articles 226 and 227 of

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs Adarsh Nobel Corporation Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Orissa at Cuttack, by way of the petition bearing MSEFC Case No. 56/2022, under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (“MSMED Act”). VI. The MSEF Council passed an arbitral award dated 10th July, 2023, thereby, directing the petitioner … enacting the MSMED Act, 2006 would get frustrated. xxx 52. The upshot of the above is that: 52.1. Chapter V of the MSMED Act, 2006 would override the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1996. 52.2. No party

Union of India Vs. Delhi Paper Products Co. Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the learned Arbitrator under Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993 and Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, this Court called upon both the parties to make submissions on justification of the high rate of interest … further submitted that the delay in re-filing beyond 30 days is considered as fresh institution under Rule 5, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volume V of Delhi High Court Rules and Orders and the petitioner cannot get the benefit … AT NEW DELHI + OMP No.209/2013 Date of decision :29. h July, 2013 % UNION OF INDIA Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Adv.