Advanced Search Results

Syed Mohmmed Jamil Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 2(42), 7(2), 95, 99, 100, 101(3), 121, 121(1), 129, 145, 178 to 183, 213, 456 and 456(1); ;Industrial Disputes Act; ;Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Section 95; ;Merchant Shipping Rules; ;Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 21, 226 and 300A

Matched in: Advocate Udayan Chakraborty, ;Sanjukta Bhattacharjee and ;Rabi Prasad Mukherjee, Advs. Jayanta Bhattacharjee and ;Indranil Chakraborty, Advs. for Shipping Corpn. of India and ;S.C. Prasad, Adv.

Model Financial Corporation, a Company Incorporated Under the Provisio ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Banking

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 13, 13(2), 13(3A), 13(4), 17, 17(1) and 31; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19 and 19(1); Conversion of Agricultural Land to Non-Agricultural Purpose Act, 2006; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 172; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 47; Aircraft Act, 1934; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 60(1); ;Constitution of India Articles 14, 226 and 300A

Reported in : III(2008)BC526

1934);(d) creation of security interest in any vessel as defined in Clause (55) of Section 3 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 (44 of 1958);(e) any conditional sale, hire-purchase or lease or any other contract in which no … also clear that whether the application was filed in the Tribunal before or after the enforcement of the Amendment Act, 2004 is immaterial, but what is relevant is whether the application is pending before the Tribunal by the … dated 23.01.2007, under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India; and consequently to direct the … withdraw. It is further stated that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in para 46 of the said Judgment had categorically observed that 'in our view, the

Vijay K. Mehta and anr. Vs. Charu K. Mehta and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 - Sections 41B, 41D, 41D(3) and 41D(4); Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888; Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976; Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971; Industrial Disputes Act, 1948; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946; Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960; Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966; Maharashtra University Act, 1994; Bombay Stamp Act, 1958; Bombay Police Act; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948; Bombay Port Trusts Act,

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR366; 2009(1)BomCR179

Vehicles Act, 1939;(xxx) the orders passed under the Major Port Trust Act, 1963;(xxxi) the orders passed under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958;(xxxii) the orders passed under the Registration Act, 1908;(xxxiii) the orders passed under the Wireless, Telegraphy Act, … 1879;(xx) the orders passed under the Bombay City (Inami and Special Tenures) Abolition and Maharashtra Land Revenue Code (Amendment) Act, 1969;(xxi) the orders passed under the Banking Corporation (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970;(xxii) the orders passed … Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.May be heard and finally disposed of by a Single Judge appointed in … 17/06 has been filed by respondent No. 1 for initiating action under Section 41-D of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as … respondent No. 1 for initiating action under Section 41-D of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 (hereinafter

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Forward Seamen Union and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Acts : Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 95, 96, 97 and 97A; ;Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : 2004(3)CHN509

to be considered in the light of the amended provisions of Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 as amended by Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2002. The bazarmen could claim the benefit of seamen or seafarers only if they could satisfy the test of … or seafarers only if they could satisfy the test of the definition given in the Explanation (b) to Section 95 of the said Act.3. There was a long-standing dispute regarding appointment of the employees for providing canteen … passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. No. 40 of 2003.2. This writ petition relates to engagement, recruitment or employment of

Naresh Kumar and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 80 and 86; Merchant Shipping (STCW) Rules, 1998 - Rules 11 and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 32; ;Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1986 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR2004SC2026; JT2004(5)SC394; 2004(4)SCALE214; (2004)4SCC540; 2004(3)SLJ1(SC)

Shipping (STCW) Rules, 1998 - Rules 11, 15 - Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 32 - Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1986 - Section 5 - Petitioners Indian Navy Officers released from Indian Navy and employed in Indian Navy … arrangements allow existing certificates to remain valid (subject to existing invalidation requirements) for 5 years until 1 February 2002. The Convention requires that certificates issued under STCW 78 be assessed and updating training undertaken where necessary to … Form 3. The respondent also issued M.S. Notice Nos. 2 of 2000, 4, 5 & 6 of 2001 in compliance with Rules 11 and 15

islamic Republic of Iran Vs. M.V. Mehrab and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2(1); Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2002Bom517; (2002)4BOMLR785; 2002(4)MhLj584

Matched in: Citation AIR2002Bom517; (2002)4BOMLR785; 2002(4)MhLj584

Mahanagar Ghaziabad Chetna Munch Through Its President, Sri Ram Avtar ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC1113

a master or owner of a pilgrim ship in the carrying out of the provisions of the Indian Merchant Shipping Act, 1923, to the notice of the authorities concerned, and to suggest remedies;(g) to authorise whenever practicable an … interferes in matters spiritual, it will be a divisive force. The First Amendment (American Constitution) teaches that a government neutral in the field of religion … 2(j) the objects, for which the Haj Fund may be applied, is given.49. Again by the Haj Committee Act, 2002 the Haj Committee Act, 1959 was repealed. Non-obstante clause in the repealing section has no manner of application … of Bombay for assisting Muslim pilgrims to Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iraq, Iran and Jordan and for matters connected therewith.Section 4 speaks about the composition of the Committee, as follows:4. Composition of the Committee.--(1) The Committee shall consist of

Forward Seamen Union of India Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Section 95; ;Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2002

bench held that the directions given by the learned single Judge were contrary to the provisions of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 (as amended by Amendment Act of 2002) ('Act' for short). It also made the following observations … employed through the contractors, though such bazarmen are not seamen or crew, are seafarers within the meaning of Section 95 of the Act.6. The appellant have challenged the said order primarily with reference to orders dated 3.2.1998 … approached the Circuit Bench of the Calcutta High Court in W.P. No. 40/2003 for quashing the said tender notice dated 18.11.2002.4. Learned Single Judge allowed

Mr. Allan S.F. Falerio Vs. State of Goa Through the Chief Secretary, S ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilRight to information

Acts : Right of Information Act; Indian Port Act, 1908 - Sections 30; Inland Vessels Act - Sections 20(4); Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 75, 76 and 78; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; STCW Code - Sections A-1/11; Merchant Shipping (Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers) Rules, 1998 - Rule 10 and 10(2); Recruitment Rules, 1973; Merchant Shipping (Medical Examination) Rules, 1986

Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR7

No. 2. It is stated that to give effect to STCW Convention, the Central Government has framed the Merchant Shipping ( Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers ) Rules, 1998 (Rules, for short ), and in … of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978, signed at London on 7th day of July, 1978, as amended from time to time. Section 76 of the said Act, inter alia, further provides that every Indian ship, … Counsel refers to the opinion given by the Under Secretary(Personnel I)(at page 42) to support his submission. The said noting, it appears was made whilst

Williams and Others Vs. British Airways Plc

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

for mobile staff in civil aviation (paragraph 2 above). This was in turn given domestic effect by The Merchant Shipping (Hours of Work) Regulations 2002 (SI 2002 No. 2125) ("the non-fishing Seafarers Regulations"), in language identical as regards … Directive, by the Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998 No. 1833) ("the Working Time Regulations"). These Regulations (as amended by the Working Time (Amendment) Regulations 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3256)) provide that a worker is "entitled to … Aviation Regulations"). These Regulations were introduced under s.2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 to comply with the United Kingdom's obligations under Council Directive 2000/79/EC … should be calculated by analogy with ss.221-4, despite the inapplicability of these sections). The Court of Appeal accepted British Airways' contrary case under both European