Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: merchant shipping amendment act 2002 section 20 · Page 1 of about 40 results (0.051 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 22 2003

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Forward Seamen Union and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-22-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 95, 96, 97 and 97A; ;Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : 2004(3)CHN509

to be considered in the light of the amended provisions of Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 as amended by Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2002. The bazarmen could claim the benefit of seamen or seafarers only if they could satisfy the test of … or seafarers only if they could satisfy the test of the definition given in the Explanation (b) to Section 95 of the said Act.3. There was a long-standing dispute regarding appointment of the employees for providing canteen … This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated June 18, 2003, passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2007

Model Financial Corporation, a Company Incorporated Under the Provisio ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-20-2007

Subject : Banking

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 13, 13(2), 13(3A), 13(4), 17, 17(1) and 31; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19 and 19(1); Conversion of Agricultural Land to Non-Agricultural Purpose Act, 2006; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 172; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 47; Aircraft Act, 1934; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 60(1); ;Constitution of India Articles 14, 226 and 300A

Reported in : III(2008)BC526

1934);(d) creation of security interest in any vessel as defined in Clause (55) of Section 3 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 (44 of 1958);(e) any conditional sale, hire-purchase or lease or any other contract in which no … also clear that whether the application was filed in the Tribunal before or after the enforcement of the Amendment Act, 2004 is immaterial, but what is relevant is whether the application is pending before the Tribunal by the … dated 23.01.2007, under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India; and consequently to direct the … Rule Nisi on 26.02.2007 and also granted interim stay, in W.P.M.P.No.4716 of 2007, on that day. 2. The writ petition is filed for a writ

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2023

Jayakumar R. vs State Bank of India

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-12-2023

1934);(d) creation of security interest in any vessel as defined in clause (55) of section 3 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 (44 of 1958); [* * * * * ](f) any rights of unpaid seller under section … No proceedings can be initiated under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 against an agricultural property. By Exts.P3 and P4, the Village Officer and the Agricultural Officer have certifiedthat the … published Ext.P8 sale notice dated 17.07.2023. The petitioner challenged Ext.P8 sale notice amending the SA. The Tribunal considered Ext.P6 commission application and dismissed the IA, … AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023/21ST AGRAHAYANA, 1945 OP (DRT) NO.462 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER IN SA

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 09 2008

Vijay K. Mehta and anr. Vs. Charu K. Mehta and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-09-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 - Sections 41B, 41D, 41D(3) and 41D(4); Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888; Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976; Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971; Industrial Disputes Act, 1948; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946; Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960; Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966; Maharashtra University Act, 1994; Bombay Stamp Act, 1958; Bombay Police Act; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948; Bombay Port Trusts Act,

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR366; 2009(1)BomCR179

Vehicles Act, 1939;(xxx) the orders passed under the Major Port Trust Act, 1963;(xxxi) the orders passed under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958;(xxxii) the orders passed under the Registration Act, 1908;(xxxiii) the orders passed under the Wireless, Telegraphy Act, … 1879;(xx) the orders passed under the Bombay City (Inami and Special Tenures) Abolition and Maharashtra Land Revenue Code (Amendment) Act, 1969;(xxi) the orders passed under the Banking Corporation (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970;(xxii) the orders passed … Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.May be heard and finally disposed of by a Single Judge appointed in … 17/06 has been filed by respondent No. 1 for initiating action under Section 41-D of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as … Commissioner, Greater Mumbai Region, Mumbai dated 23rd July, 2008 below Exhibit-1 in Application No. 17 of 2007.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 2012

Sabeeha Faikage and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-18-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 32, 21; Merchant Shipping (Recruitment and Placement of Seafarers) Rules, 2005 - Rule 4(3)(a), 3(1)(j); Shipping Act, 2004 - Section 338

Reported in : (2013)1SCC262

which the Government of India has certified that their husbands/sons are presumed to be dead. After perusing the Merchant Shipping Notice No.26 of 2002 dated 10.10.2002 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Shipping, Directorate of the … After perusing the Merchant Shipping Notice No.26 of 2002 dated 10.10.2002 issued by the Government of India, … the Code for the Investigation of Marine Casualties and Incidents) to enable the lead investigating State to incorporate/ amend / modify the final report?(e) In how many cases the Indian Government has made available to the public … & I correspondent, the petitioners will be informed of the further follow-up action to process the claims. Finally, the petitioners received the communication dated 17.08.2006 … Africa, but Jupiter-6 could not be located. Pursuant to reports in a section of the media about the missing of Jupiter-6 since 08.10.2005, the Director

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2006

Mahanagar Ghaziabad Chetna Munch Through Its President, Sri Ram Avtar ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-08-2006

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC1113

a master or owner of a pilgrim ship in the carrying out of the provisions of the Indian Merchant Shipping Act, 1923, to the notice of the authorities concerned, and to suggest remedies;(g) to authorise whenever practicable an … interferes in matters spiritual, it will be a divisive force. The First Amendment (American Constitution) teaches that a government neutral in the field of religion … 2(j) the objects, for which the Haj Fund may be applied, is given.49. Again by the Haj Committee Act, 2002 the Haj Committee Act, 1959 was repealed. Non-obstante clause in the repealing section has no manner of application … Samiti, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow for a period of 30 years in November, 2004 by the side of river Hindon at Ghaziabad, which is 'doob kshetra'

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2009

Forward Seamen Union of India Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-05-2009

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Section 95; ;Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2002

bench held that the directions given by the learned single Judge were contrary to the provisions of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 (as amended by Amendment Act of 2002) ('Act' for short). It also made the following observations … employed through the contractors, though such bazarmen are not seamen or crew, are seafarers within the meaning of Section 95 of the Act.6. The appellant have challenged the said order primarily with reference to orders dated 3.2.1998 … the recommendations dated 6.4.1998 by order dated 26.6.1998. By another order dated 20.11.1998, SCI was directed to discuss all issues relating to Bazarmen only with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 2003

Antonio R. Borges and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through Its Secre ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-27-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 121 and 212; Merchant Shipping Rules, 1986 - Rule 45

Reported in : 2003(4)BomCR529

the effect of discharging the petitioners from their services. The order was based on the provisions of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958. The petitioners have also challenged the enquiry sought to be initiated against them pursuant to the … of the learned Advocate for the petitioners was on the basis of section 121 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the … thereunder. It is pertinent to note that eventhough this ground was included in the petition by way of amendment, no specific provision of the Act of 1958 or the Rules is quoted in support thereof as to … the petition.17. Regarding these orders at Annexure 'X' colly. dated 5th January, 2002, the learned Counsel for the respondents contended that defence assistance was provided … number, have challenged the order dated 2nd May, 2001, issued by the surveyor-in-charge, Captain K.P. Jayakumar, which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2010

Williams and Others Vs. British Airways Plc

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-24-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

for mobile staff in civil aviation (paragraph 2 above). This was in turn given domestic effect by The Merchant Shipping (Hours of Work) Regulations 2002 (SI 2002 No. 2125) ("the non-fishing Seafarers Regulations"), in language identical as regards … Directive, by the Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998 No. 1833) ("the Working Time Regulations"). These Regulations (as amended by the Working Time (Amendment) Regulations 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3256)) provide that a worker is "entitled to … Aviation Regulations"). These Regulations were introduced under s.2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 to comply with the United Kingdom's obligations under Council Directive 2000/79/EC … should be calculated by analogy with ss.221-4, despite the inapplicability of these sections). The Court of Appeal accepted British Airways' contrary case under both European … 4 of The Civil Aviation (Working Time) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004 No. 756) ("the Aviation Regulations"). These

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2006

Parties : R and Others (Appellants) Vs. Director of Public Prosecution ...

Court : House of Lords

Decided on : Mar-29-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

1984; the War Crimes Act 1991, giving jurisdiction to try war crimes committed abroad by foreign nationals; the Merchant Shipping and Maritime Security Act 1997, s 26, giving effect to provisions of the United Nations Convention on the … practice is to legislate. Examples may be found in the Geneva Conventions Act 1957 and the Geneva Conventions (Amendment) Act 1995, dealing with breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the Additional Protocols of 1977; the Genocide … into the domestic legal order of England and Wales. 2. There are 20 appellants before the House. All of them committed acts in February or … count) charged with counts of conspiracy to cause criminal damage contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977 (Jones, Milling, Olditch, Pritchard), having

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial