Advanced Search Results

Syed Mohmmed Jamil Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 2(42), 7(2), 95, 99, 100, 101(3), 121, 121(1), 129, 145, 178 to 183, 213, 456 and 456(1); ;Industrial Disputes Act; ;Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Section 95; ;Merchant Shipping Rules; ;Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 21, 226 and 300A

Matched in: Advocate Udayan Chakraborty, ;Sanjukta Bhattacharjee and ;Rabi Prasad Mukherjee, Advs. Jayanta Bhattacharjee and ;Indranil Chakraborty, Advs. for Shipping Corpn. of India and ;S.C. Prasad, Adv.

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Forward Seamen Union and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Acts : Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 95, 96, 97 and 97A; ;Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : 2004(3)CHN509

to be considered in the light of the amended provisions of Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 as amended by Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2002. The bazarmen could claim the benefit of seamen or seafarers only if they could satisfy the test of … or seafarers only if they could satisfy the test of the definition given in the Explanation (b) to Section 95 of the said Act.3. There was a long-standing dispute regarding appointment of the employees for providing canteen

islamic Republic of Iran Vs. M.V. Mehrab and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2(1); Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2002Bom517; (2002)4BOMLR785; 2002(4)MhLj584

Matched in: Citation AIR2002Bom517; (2002)4BOMLR785; 2002(4)MhLj584

Antonio R. Borges and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through Its Secre ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 121 and 212; Merchant Shipping Rules, 1986 - Rule 45

Reported in : 2003(4)BomCR529

the effect of discharging the petitioners from their services. The order was based on the provisions of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958. The petitioners have also challenged the enquiry sought to be initiated against them pursuant to the … that eventhough this ground was included in the petition by way of amendment, no specific provision of the Act of 1958 or the Rules is … the petition.17. Regarding these orders at Annexure 'X' colly. dated 5th January, 2002, the learned Counsel for the respondents contended that defence assistance was provided … Office) Rules, 1986. Under Rule 45 the powers have been given to the Director, who is appointed under section 12 of the Act of 1958, and, therefore, it was contended by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that

Model Financial Corporation, a Company Incorporated Under the Provisio ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Banking

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 13, 13(2), 13(3A), 13(4), 17, 17(1) and 31; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19 and 19(1); Conversion of Agricultural Land to Non-Agricultural Purpose Act, 2006; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 172; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 47; Aircraft Act, 1934; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 60(1); ;Constitution of India Articles 14, 226 and 300A

Reported in : III(2008)BC526

1934);(d) creation of security interest in any vessel as defined in Clause (55) of Section 3 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 (44 of 1958);(e) any conditional sale, hire-purchase or lease or any other contract in which no … also clear that whether the application was filed in the Tribunal before or after the enforcement of the Amendment Act, 2004 is immaterial, but what is relevant is whether the application is pending before the Tribunal by the … dated 23.01.2007, under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India; and consequently to direct the

Jayakumar R. vs State Bank of India

Court : Kerala

1934);(d) creation of security interest in any vessel as defined in clause (55) of section 3 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 (44 of 1958); [* * * * * ](f) any rights of unpaid seller under section … No proceedings can be initiated under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 against an agricultural property. By Exts.P3 and P4, the Village Officer and the Agricultural Officer have certifiedthat the … published Ext.P8 sale notice dated 17.07.2023. The petitioner challenged Ext.P8 sale notice amending the SA. The Tribunal considered Ext.P6 commission application and dismissed the IA, … HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023/21ST AGRAHAYANA, 1945 OP (DRT) NO.462 OF 2023 AGAINST

Vijay K. Mehta and anr. Vs. Charu K. Mehta and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 - Sections 41B, 41D, 41D(3) and 41D(4); Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888; Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976; Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971; Industrial Disputes Act, 1948; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946; Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960; Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966; Maharashtra University Act, 1994; Bombay Stamp Act, 1958; Bombay Police Act; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948; Bombay Port Trusts Act,

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR366; 2009(1)BomCR179

Vehicles Act, 1939;(xxx) the orders passed under the Major Port Trust Act, 1963;(xxxi) the orders passed under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958;(xxxii) the orders passed under the Registration Act, 1908;(xxxiii) the orders passed under the Wireless, Telegraphy Act, … 1879;(xx) the orders passed under the Bombay City (Inami and Special Tenures) Abolition and Maharashtra Land Revenue Code (Amendment) Act, 1969;(xxi) the orders passed under the Banking Corporation (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970;(xxii) the orders passed … Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.May be heard and finally disposed of by a Single Judge appointed in … 17/06 has been filed by respondent No. 1 for initiating action under Section 41-D of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as

Thyssen Krupp Materials Ag vs.the Steel Authority of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

terms of the contract must be agreed to before a concluded contract can come into existence. Furthermore, no shipping date was agreed to between the parties nor was the size finalized. SAIL stated that it was merely … the agreement for the supply of second lot on 12.05.1994 (hereafter “the amendment”). Thyssen‟s officers and experts made regular visits to SAIL‟s Bokaro Steel Plant … SAIL did not answer to the description and specifications agreed to by the parties nor was it of merchantable quality. The CRC was incapable of being used for the purpose which “prime cold rolled mild steel sheet” … arbitral award; therefore, this appeal under Section 39 of the (old) Arbitration Act 1940 (“the Act”), read with Section 10 of the Delhi High Court

Forward Seamen Union of India Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Section 95; ;Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2002

bench held that the directions given by the learned single Judge were contrary to the provisions of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 (as amended by Amendment Act of 2002) ('Act' for short). It also made the following observations … employed through the contractors, though such bazarmen are not seamen or crew, are seafarers within the meaning of Section 95 of the Act.6. The appellant have challenged the said order primarily with reference to orders dated 3.2.1998 … accident with bus - He was aged 43 years and earning Rs. 12000/-p.m. as Contractor Applying multiplier of 10 and making 1/3rd deduction claimants would

The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

round the clock (24 hours a day) throughout the contract period.9. The Contractor shall comply with the Indian Merchant Shipping Act and any other legislation related to the operation of a tug in Indian territorial waters, and if … tax on the transfer of the right to use any goods. Article 366(29A)(d) inserted by the Constitution (46th Amendment) Act, 1982 on 2.2.1983 reads: “366. (29) “tax on income” includes a tax in the nature of an excess … mean that the territorial waters belong to Karnataka. The State cannot claim 12 nautical miles as part of its territory; otherwise, each maritime State can … to transfer of the right to use goods within the meaning of section 5C of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (for short, “the KST