Advanced Search Results

Kay Kay Embroideries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cloth Markets and Shops Board and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 2(3), 2(4), 2(9), 2(11), 2(12), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25F and 170B; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Factories Act, 1948; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; Maharashtra Factories Rules, 1963; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1923; Security Guards Act; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Employees Provident Funds and Family Pension Act, 1952; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abo

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR5; 2006(6)BomCR739; [2007(112)FLR273]; (2007)ILLJ865Bom; 2006(6)MhLj377

by a like notification cancel or vary any notification issued under Sub-section (1).20. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to in this section as 'the said Act') the State Government may, by notification in the … Bench in the case of Irkar Sahu and Anr. v. Bombay Port Trusts, reported in 1994 (1) CLR 187 and this is also the view of the learned Division Bench in Century Textile's case (supra) and, therefore,

Bhuwalka Steel Indus. Ltd. Vs. Bombay Iron and Steel Labour Bd. and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 - Sections 1, 2, 2(2), 2(11), 2(12), 4, 6, 14, 15, 15(2), 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 3(13), 3(14), 17G and 44; Security Guards Act; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 147, 145 and 149; Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 8(3); Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam - Sections 50(1); Constitution of India - Articles 141, 254 and 254(2)

Reported in : 2010(1)BomCR656; JT2009(15)SC269; (2010)ILLJ561SC; 2009(14)SCALE623; (2010)2SCC273; 2009(10)LC5041(SC)

provision regarding the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 to the workers, while Section 20 provides the application of Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. We do not see any relevance of these Sections, particularly, to arrive at the correct meaning of Section … Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 would be applicable in case of trial of offences under this Act. Similarly, Section 18 provides that provisions of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 shall mutatis mutandis apply to registered unprotected workers and they

The Century Textiles and Industries Ltd. and Another Vs. State of Maha ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 - Sections 1(4-A), 2(10), (11), (12), 3(1), 14 and 72; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 19; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(P), 5 and 18(1); Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 31 and 254; Shops & Establishments Act; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 - Sections 20, 21 and 22; Contract Labour (Regulation of Abolition) Act, 1970

Reported in : 2000(2)ALLMR536; 2000(3)BomCR461; (2000)IILLJ815Bom; 2001(2)MhLj775

provisions of Payment of Wages Act, 1936 made applicable to the workers under section 19. Provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 are made applicable to the workers under section 20. But, with regard to this, there is a final … provisions with regard to the constitution of a board etc. need not be gone into for this purpose. Section 18 makes the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, applicable to Mathadis workers who are registered as unprotected

H.R. Adyanthaya Etc. Etc. Vs. Sandoz (India) Ltd., Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : LAbour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1) and 33-C; Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1976 - Sections 1(4) and 2; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 - Sections 17; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 142; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 3(18); Nevy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Nevy Act, 1957; Dock Workers (Regulation of Employemtn) Act, 1948 - Sections 5-A; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1994SC2608; JT1994(5)SC176; (1995)ILLJ303SC; 1994(3)SCALE816; (1994)5SCC737; [1994]Supp2SCR573; 1994(3)SLJ145(SC); (1995)1UPLBEC173

Act made the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, (the ID Act), Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 and Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, applicable forthwith to the medical representatives. Sub-section … the ID Act. This dispute was referred by the State Government for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal on 18th August, 1961. The Tribunal had accepted the evidence of the workmen that the writing work of the inspectors,

Bandhua Mukti Morcha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 32(1), 32(2), 39, 41, 42, 226 and 256; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XXVI - Order XLVI, Rules 6, 13, 14, 19, 20, 21 and 22; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act; Inter-State Migrant Workmen Rules; Mines Rules, 1955 - Rules 30 to 32; Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 - Sections 2(1), 4, 8, 12 and 21; Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Central Rules, 1980 - Rules 22 to 45; Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 4, 5 and 10 to 15; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Evidence Act; Contract Labour Act - Sections 2(1), 16, 17, 18 and 19; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Central Rules

Reported in : AIR1984SC802; 1984LabIC560; 1983(2)SCALE1151; (1984)3SCC161; [1984]2SCR67; 1984(16)LC29(SC); 1983 (3) SCC 161

1936, The Employees' State Insurance Act 1948, The Employees' Provident Funds and Misc. Provisions Act, 1952, and the Maternity Benefit Act 1961. The obligation to give effect to the provisions contained in these various laws is not only that of … Mines Rules, 1955 rests on the owner, agent and manager of every stone quarry and stone crusher, because Section 18 declares that the owner, agent and manager of every mine shall be responsible that all operations carried on

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Female Workers (Muster Roll) and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationLabour and Industrial

Acts : Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 21 and 23; Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 5A and 50; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 14, 38, 39, 42 and 43; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Trade Unions Act, 1926; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 27; Industrial Disputes Act

Reported in : AIR2000SC1274; 2000(2)ALT34(SC); 84(2000)DLT450(SC); [2000(85)FLR185]; JT2000(3)SC13; (2000)ILLJ846SC; (2000)125PLR371; RLW2000(2)SC329; 2000(2)SCALE269; (2000)3SCC224; [20

that the female workers required the same maternity benefits as were enjoyed by regular female workers under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. The denial of these benefits exhibits a negative attitude of the Corporation in respect of a humane problem.3. … justification for denying the benefit of this Act to casual workers or workers employed on dally wage basis.12. Section 2 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 deals with the applicability of the Act. Section 3 contains definitions. … a member or a voluntary organisation registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 or an Inspector, may file a complaint regarding the commission of an

B S Rajeshwari Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

aforesaid Articles.12. The very issue as to whether a contract employee is entitled to maternity leave under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 came up for consideration before the Apex Court in the case of MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI VS. FEMALE … PÁAiÉÄÝAiÀÄ£ÀéAiÀÄ CªÀPÁ±À«gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. Protection of women in case she is fired by the employer after learning her pregnancy, Under Section 12(Dismissal during absence or pregnancy) of the M.B act 1961 it is emphasized that any dismissal or discharge … prevent the State from making any special provision for women and children.” 18 7. In Yusuf Abdul Aziz v. State of Bombay [AIR1954SC321:1954. SCR930 it

Cherpulassery Co-Operative Hospital vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

NO. 32291 OF 2014 : 3 :Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1960, the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 and the Kerala Industrial Establishments (National and Festival Holidays) Act, 1958, and issued Ext.P2 inspection note. To Ext.P2, … of the Minimum Wages Act are applicable and is liable to maintain registers and records as provided under Section 18 of the Minimum Wages Act and Rules framed thereunder.19. As regards the applicability of theprovisions of the Maternity

Nima.K.V vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

26 weeks and the benefits thereafter. She seeks a declaration that the proviso to Section 5(3) of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 does not deprive a woman employee from availing 26 weeks' Maternity Leave for her 2nd delivery.2. The petitioner … the Assistant General Manager as per Ext.P2 letter dated 01.03.2019 informed her that as per Ext.P3 Circular dated 18.08.2017, Maternity Leave for 26 weeks' isadmissible only to a woman employee with less than two surviving children; a

L.Kannaki Vs. the Secretary to Government and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 - Sections 5(2), 12, 3(o); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21

reply to the representations made by the petitioner. It is submitted that as per Section 5(2) of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 (shortly “the Act”), a woman employee, who has rendered service more than 80 days, is entitled to maternity … Application in O.A.No.6784 of 1999 before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal and the Tribunal passed an order dated 18.11.1999 directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 31.03.1999. 6.Pursuant to the order