Advanced Search Results

Ramesh Chandra Das Vs. Birendra Kishore Manikya

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1925Cal513

reference to the provisions of Order 32, Civil P.C. a minor is a person who under the Indian Majority Act (IX of 1875) has not completed the age of 18 years or of whose person and property a … of Wards and he has not completed the age of 21 years.7. The Indian Majority Act, as the preamble shows, applies only to persons domiciled in British India. Admittedly the Maharaja is not domiciled in British territory. … the respondent Maharaja Birendra Kishore Manikya Bahadur of Tipperah died on the 13th August, 1923, leaving as his son and heir the said Maharaja Bir

G.M. Jeelani Vs. Shanswar Kulsum and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125 to 128; ;Muslim Law

Reported in : 1993(1)ALT(Cri)171; 1994CriLJ271

the Code reads as follows : (a) 'minor' means a person who, under the provisions of the Indian Majority Act 1875 (9 of 1875) is deemed not to have attained his majority.' 9. Thus, since the minor daughter is … the Act also has no application. 5. Sri Venugopala Rao learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the preamble of the Act shows that the provisions of the Act have to be applied to maintenance of the … irrevocable Talaq on 2-7-1980. Subsequently the wife filed M.C. No. 45 of 1980 on the file of the learned II Additional J.F.C.M. Kakinada, under section

Rahamathulla Vs. Piyare and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 123, 125, 125(1) and 127

Reported in : 1996CriLJ4322; II(1996)DMC295

S. 125 Cr.P.C., she is entitled to maintenance till she attains majority as per the provisions of Indian Majority Act, 1875. As such, I find that the minor daughter is entitled to maintenance till she attains majority as per … aged above two years. He would effectively in his (sic) way say, that a plain reading of the preamble of the Act 25 of 1986 would disclose that this Act of 1986 would not be applicable to … child of divorced Muslim wife is entitled to claim maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, from its father even after

Dr.Subramanian Swamy Vs. the Registrar, Office of Registrar for Newspa ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

ordinarily reside in India or who has not attained majority in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Majority Act, 1875 (9 of 1875), or of the law to which he is subject in respect of the attainment of … this Section, nor shall any such person edit a newspaper.” 10. The said Act, as proclaimed by its preamble, was enacted to regulate the printing press, newspapers and books. Newspapers would include periodicals as per the definition … DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: November 08, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: December 17, 2013 + W.P.(C) No.2986/2013 DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY .....Petitioner Represented by: Petitioner in

M.K. Agarwal and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : 1994IAD(Delhi)962; AIR1994Delhi242; 53(1994)DLT751; 1994(28)DRJ664

ordinarily reside in India, or who has not attained majority in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Majority Act, 1875 (9 of 1875), or of the land to which he is subject in respect of the attainment of … note some relevant provisions of the Prb Act and the Trade Marks Act. The Prb Act, as the preamble would show. was enacted to provide for the regulation of printing-presses, newspapers, for the preservation of books and … No.2, under Section 6 of the Press & Registration of Books Act, 1867. having same or similar names as that of the applicants Newspapers. (II)To

Sanjeev Kapoor Vs. Chandana Kapoor

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

the purposes of this Chapter, - (a) “minor” means a person who, under the provisions of the Indian Majority Act, 1875(9 of 1875) is deemed not to have attained his majority; (b) “wife” includes a woman who has … the marginalised sections of the society. The purpose is to achieve “social the constitutional vision, enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India. the Constitution of India clearly signals that we have chosen the democratic path … 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL

Noor Saba Khatoon Vs. Mohd. Quasim

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Family Criminal

Acts : Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1997SC3280; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)355; 1997(2)BLJR1633; 1997CriLJ3972; 1997(3)Crimes106(SC); II(1997)DMC356SC; (1998)1GLR187; JT1997(7)SC104; 1997(2)KLT363(SC); RLW1997(3)SC358

children and parents governed by Muslim law....As regards children, the Code adopts the age of minority from the Majority Act, 1875 by saying : 'Minor means a person who, under the provisions of the Indian Majority Act; 1875 (9 … Muslim parents to the grant of maintenance under Section 125, Cr. P.C. is thus the moot question?5. The preamble to the 1986 Act reads:An Act to protect the rights of Muslim women who have been divorced by, … children of Muslim parents arc entitled to grant of maintenance under Section 125, Cr.P.C. for the period till they attain majority or are able to

Chepuri Hanumantha Rao Vs. Chepuri Uma Bala

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

For the purposes of this Chapter,- (a) minor means a person who, under the provisions of the Indian Majority Act, 1875 (9 of 1875 ); is deemed not to have attained his majority; (b) wife includes a woman who … of the society. The purpose is to achieve social justice which is the Constitutional vision, enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India. Preamble to the Constitution of India clearly signals that we have chosen the … 1. The Revision Petitioner/Sri Chepuri Hanumantha Rao, is sole respondent in M.C.No.262 of

P Lathavya Acharya Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : MRTP

of entering into a binding contract and undertake responsibilities as majors. This is the purpose for which the Majority Act, 1875 was enacted. 61 61 While prescribing the age of majority as 18 years for this purpose, a specific … ® 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021 PRESENT THE

Eerati Laxman Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(35), 3(66) and 20; Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 - Sections 2 and 20; Indian Majority Act, 1875 - Sections 3; Family Law Reform Act, 1969; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : AIR2009SC1816; 2009CriLJ1727; RLW2009(2)SC2221; 2009(1)SCALE41; (2009)3SCC337

mean that the principle of literal interpretation thereof should not be resorted to.8. Section 3 of the Indian Majority Act, 1875 provides for age of majority of persons domiciled in India and the criteria for computation of age of … great respect, we cannot agree to the said statement of law. It is incorrect to say that the preamble speaks of the things of post-delinquency only. The Act not only refers to the obligations of the country … life. Allegations against him were that on or about 9.5.1994 at about 1.00 p.m. he committed murder of one Pittala Chandrakala by pouring kerosene over