Advanced Search Results

Atanu Ranjan Ghosh Vs. Arup Ranjan Ghosh

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 - Sections 2, 57, 69(3), 78, 79, 79(1), 80 to 83, 84 and 87; ;Indian Lunacy Act, 1912; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 60(2); ;Registration Act, 1908; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925

Reported in : AIR2009Cal76,(2008)3CALLT445(HC),2008(3)CHN987

of a member who has become insane, to the person appointed to manage his properties under the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 (4 of 1912).(2) All payments and transfers made by a co-operative society in accordance with the provisions of … and includes a joint member and, subject to the provisions of Sub-section (3) of Section 69, a nominal member.Section 78. Restriction on transfer of share or interest-(1) The transfer or charge of the share or interest of a

Om Prakash Gupta Vs. Puspa Kumari

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5

Reported in : ILR1969Delhi953

his own affairs. A similar test would appear to have been adopted in section 38 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912. But the purpose of the Lunacy Act, 1912 as also of the English Mental Health Act, 1959, is … marriage. In Park v. Park (7) upheld in appeal in 1954 Probate Division 112, the marriage of a 78 year old man was held to be valid though his mind had been found to be impaired after

Ravinder vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

been an abuse of the powers under the mental health law in this country i.e. under the Indian Lunacy Act 1912 (ILA) and later the MHA. This emphasises the need to view the mental health law as essentially concerning … volunteers and Panel Lawyers who are sensitive to such issues and persons.‖ 78. Specific to the need for legal aid during Court proceedings, the NALSA2015Scheme … by the Duty MM and MM, the Court has, in the fourth part, undertaken a detailed analysis of Sections 23, 24 and 28 of the MHA. The Court has traced the development of the mental health law

Dr. Sangamitra Acharya & Anr. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

under special circumstances‘.85. In this context, it requires to be noticed that the MHA replaced the earlier Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 (‗ILA‘) which had become outdated. Parliament acknowledged that mental illness was a curable conidtion and that the attitude … plurality and diversity of our culture.‖ (emphasis supplied) Role of Z’s parents 78. In the present case, the trouble started for Z when she began … her fundamental rights to life, liberty, dignity and privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and Section 19 of the MHA. The Court has passed consequential orders fastening liability on each of the actors responsible

Amina Bharatram Vs. Sumant Bharatram and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Such reliefs may also be sought under the provisions of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 and the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956. It is far from clear whether Parliament intended that proceedings … by the Apex Court in Dhulabhai vs. State of MP, AIR1969Supreme Court 78 at page 89 (para32) which reads as under:“(1) Where the statute gives … SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff, Mrs.Amina Bharatram has filed the suit for maintenance and separate residence under Sections 18, 20 & 23 of the Hindu Adoption & Maintenance Act, 1956 as well as for permanent and

The State of Maharashtra and Another Vs. Santosh Maruti Mane and Anoth ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

and 19 the Court considered the evidence on record and observed that under section 5 of the Indian Lunacy Act IV of 1912 Reception Order was passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 11th Court, Kurla, Mumbai and … about damage to public property and lives of the people who were crushed to death under his vehicle. 78. Prosecution has finally examined P.W. 20 - Bapur Lonkar who was successful in stopping the vehicle. He is

The Rajah of Vizianagaram Vs. the Secretary of State for India in Coun ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CivilFamily

Reported in : (1936)71MLJ873

same : Act 34 of 1858 and Act 35 of 1858 and Sections 37 and 62 of the Lunacy Act (IV of 1912) (an enactment consolidating the previous Acts) make it clear that the Supreme Court had not … dated the 7th May, 1936, but for the sake of easy reference I shall briefly recapitulate them. Under Section 15 of the Court of Wards Act, the Local Government made a declaration that the petitioner was a