Advanced Search Results

Amar Nath Kapur Vs. Pran Nath Khanna

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 488 and 488(5); Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 7 and 33

Reported in : 1968CriLJ1268; 3(1968)DLT15

was posted in Delhi. In June 1960, a Reception Order, as envisaged by Section 7 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912, was made by the Additional District Magistrate, Delhi, in respect of Shrimati Kamla and on 23rd June 1960

Golo Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 13

Reported in : 3(1967)DLT506

circumstances in future. (3) It is concededthat proceedings against Golo were started under section 13 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912. This section provides as under:- '13.Powers an duties of police in respect of wandering of or dangerous lunatics … as under :- '23.Detention of lunatics pending removal to asylum. When any reception order has been made under section 7, 10, 14 or 15, the Magistiate may, for reason to be recorded in writing, direct that the lunatic,

Srimati Anilbala Chowdhurani Vs. Dhirendra Nath Saha Choudhury and anr ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 57Ind.Cas.768

Teunon, J.1. This appeal arises out of an application under Section 62 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912, to the District Judge of Pabna.2. The jurisdiction of the High Court (i.e., Sections 37 and 62 of … is little. In Sarish Chunier Singh, In the matter of 21 C. 206 : 10 Ind. Dec. (N.S.) 770 Sale, J., refused to appoint a guardian of the person and property of an infant, who was not

In Re: Megal Markus Pereira

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Mental Health Act, 1987 - Sections 2; Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 7; Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 53, 54(2), 76 and 96; Indian High Courts Act, 1861; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 223; Constitution of India - Article 225; Family Courts Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 62 and 62(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2; Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 7; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 32, Rule 15

Reported in : AIR2006Bom273; 2006(6)ALLMR298

with all or any of the matters specified in this Act;In comparison, under the provisions of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912, District Court Section 3(3) was defined as under:3(3) 'District Court' means the principal civil court of original jurisdiction … of the constitution of India.9. Before we proceed further in the matter, we may note the provisions of Section 7 of the Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869. Section 7 reads as under: -The District Court shall be the

Tippanna Ramchandra Jannu Since Decd. by His Heirs Vs. Somnath Dnyanob ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 32, Rule 15; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33

Reported in : 1990(1)BomCR677

back on 26th November, 1957, his grand-father Bhagwant had instituted a petition under section 63 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 for declaring Somnath as a lunatic and for appointment of a guardian for his person as well as … This certificate shows that the plaintiff was born on 17-7-1936. That, he was admitted to the school on 7-6-1943 in First Standard and that he left the school on 22-6-1945 without clearing the First Standard. He was

Joseph Felix Ferninand Navier Vs. Soucila Engine Juliette Navier

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1991)2MLJ99

dated 19.11.1987 made in I.A. No. 537 of 1984, a petition filed under Section 80 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912, in G.O.P. No. 109 of 1970 on the file of the Second Additional District Judge, Pondicherry.2. Certain basic … The Military Department granted him a pension for invalidity temporarily rated at 60% valid for the period from 7.2.1966 to 6.2.1969. Even though he was directed for periodical check-up, he had never been medically examined during his

Rajendra Kumar Gupta Vs. Sailendra Kumar Gupta

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1937Cal735

make an order of the kind complained of, under the provisions of 8. 71 read with Section 56, Lunacy Act, 1912, but no power to make any order in the nature of a preserving or protective order as regards … paid to the pension holder Rajendra Kumar Gupta. I pass the order under Section 56 read with Section 71, Lunacy Act.2. It appears that some time, indeed two or three years, before the date of the petition,

Smt. Gurmail Kaur and ors. Vs. Smt. Jaswant Kaur and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Property

Reported in : (2007)146PLR763

was the alienation of his property which he had inherited from his father.18. Section 3(5) of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 defines the 'lunatic' to mean an idiot or person of unsound mind. In the Chambers Dictionary (Deluxe Edition) … his contentions he relied upon Major Singh v. Rattan Singh (dead) by LRs. and Ors (1997-1) 115 P.L.R. 783 (S.C.) : : AIR1997SC1906 , Bondar Singh and Ors. v. Nihal Singh and Ors. : [2003]2SCR564 , Punjab

Miss. Ezlinda Fernandes Vs. Mr. Chetan Sanghi, Sub-divisional Magistra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 3, 3(5) and 13; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 1997(4)BomCR641

not a lunatic within meaning of the said expression 'Lunatic' as defined by section 3(5) of The Indian Lunacy Act, 1912. The respondents impleaded in this petition are :(1) Mr. Chetan Sanghi, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Panaji-Goa, (2) Mr. Umesh Gaonkar, … complained of her illegal detention in the Institute of Psychiatry and Human Behaviour during the period commencing from 7-10-1991 until 6-11-1991 without authority of law and in breach of her fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of

Chanvirgouda Shivangouda Patil Vs. the District Magistrate

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyFamily

Reported in : (1927)29BOMLR52

be called upon to pay the coat of maintenance of such son, under Section 88 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912. The obligation extends quite irrespective of the quantum of share which the lunatic has in the property.;The expression … to the joint family property. (See Local Rules and Orders under Enactments applying to Bombay, Vol. II, pp. 705 and 706.) The opponent (the father' of the lunatic) contended that he was not personally liable to maintain