Advanced Search Results

Miss. Ezlinda Fernandes Vs. Mr. Chetan Sanghi, Sub-divisional Magistra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 3, 3(5) and 13; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 1997(4)BomCR641

not a lunatic within meaning of the said expression 'Lunatic' as defined by section 3(5) of The Indian Lunacy Act, 1912. The respondents impleaded in this petition are :(1) Mr. Chetan Sanghi, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Panaji-Goa, (2) Mr. Umesh Gaonkar,

Mrs. Meera Nireshwalia Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1991CriLJ2395

fifth respondent, enough to attract the powers and duties of a police officer under section 13 of the Lunacy Act, 1912. 22. Section 13 of the Lunacy Act states, '(1) Every Officer-in-charge of a police station may arrest or … but an excuse for the purpose of this case. 28. The Madras City Police Act has contemplated in Section 5, 'The administration of the Police of the City of Madras shall be vested in an Officer to be

Simhachala Mahanti Vs. Bhagirathi Mahanti

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 5, 6, 40 to 42, 62, 63, 65 and 67 to 71

Reported in : AIR1976AP83

appointment of manager - Sections 5, 6, 40, 41, 42, 62, 63, 65 and 67 to 71 of Lunacy Act, 1912 - property given to lunatic for her maintenance - Court appointed an advocate as manager for property of … of the court of the District Judge, Srikakulam. The respondent herein filed O.P. No. 11 of 1971 under Section 71 of the Indian Lunacy Act for his being appointed as the property guardian of the property described

R. Lingaraj and ors. Vs. Parvathi

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 3(5) and 62

Reported in : AIR1975Mad285

ORDERNatarajan, J.1. R. Lingaraj, who has been held to be a lunatic under the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and respondents 1 to 4 in O. P. No. 169 of 1969 … of July 1969, the brothers of Lingaraj who are appellants 3 to 5 herein, decoyed Lingaraj from his house and were detaining him unlawfully in … Parvathi alias Kundhiammal, the respondent herein, is the wife of Lingaraj. She came forward with a petition under Sections 62 and 67 of the Act for directing an inquisition for the purpose of ascertaining whether her husband,

Sm. Anima Roy Vs. Probodh Mohan Roy

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 12(1) and 12(2); ;Lunacy Act, 1912 - Section 3(5); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 102

Reported in : AIR1969Cal304,73CWN100

of lunacy. But who is a lunatic? The Hindu Marriage Act does not even define a 'lunatic'. The Lunacy Act, 4 of 1912, does, as Mr. Ghosh, appearing for the husband respondent, points out. By Section 3, Clause … after May 18, 1955, voidable, and provides for its annulment, by a decree of nullity, if it contravenes Section 5, Clause (ii), thereof. Section 5, Clause (ii), in turn, provides that a marriage may be solemnized between any

Ramchandra Ganpat Agarwale Vs. the Cantonment Magistrate

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilFamily

Reported in : (1930)32BOMLR606

be called upon to pay the cost of maintenance of such son, under Section 88 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912. The obligation extends quite irrespective of the quantum of share which the lunatic has in the property. It; … order against the father-in-law of a female lunatic to pay for her maintenance at the rate of Rs. 5-4-0 a day. The lunatic was admitted in the hospital on November 20, 1926, and discharged on April 8,

Amar Nath Kapur Vs. Pran Nath Khanna

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 488 and 488(5); Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 7 and 33

Reported in : 1968CriLJ1268; 3(1968)DLT15

was posted in Delhi. In June 1960, a Reception Order, as envisaged by Section 7 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912, was made by the Additional District Magistrate, Delhi, in respect of Shrimati Kamla and on 23rd June 1960 … of Shrimati Kamla, filed application under Section 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for award of Rs. 500 per mensem as maintenance for her. The ground, on which maintenance was sought, was that the respondent had

Prabir Kumar Das Vs. Smt. Jayanti Das and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : City Civil Court Act, 1953 - Sections 2(3), 5, 5(1) and 5(3); ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 270, 300 and 300(1); ;Guardians and Wards Act, 1890; ;Indian Lunacy Act, 1912; ;City Civil Court (Amendment) Act, 1980

Reported in : (2007)1CALLT227(HC)

under-(i) the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (8 of 1890)(ii) X X X X X X(iii) the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 (39 of 1925)(iv) the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (39 of 1925)7. Sub-section (1) of Section 300 of the … me first deal with the appropriate provisions of law. Sections 270, 300(1) of the Indian Succession Act and Section 5(3) of the City Civil Court Act are quoted below:The Indian Succession Act:270. When probate or administration may be

Kumaravel Pillai Vs. S. Ganapathi and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 60, 60(2), 80, 82, 82(2) and 151; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rule 5; Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 41 and 41(3)

Reported in : AIR1971Mad216

This Letters Patent appeal is directed against the order of Gokulakrishnan J. in proceedings arising under the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912. The relative facts may briefly be stated for a proper appreciation of the various aspects arising in this … lunacy. Chapter IV therein deals with proceedings in lunacy in Presidency towns, such as Calcutta, Madras and Bombay. Section 60 provides for proceedings in lunacy to cease or to be set aside if court finds that the … any decision or finding given in a proceeding under Order XXII, Rule 5, C. P. Code should be limited only for the purpose of carrying

Anilabala Chowdhurani Vs. Dhirendra Nath Saha

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1921Cal309,65Ind.Cas.57

who were equally divided in opinion, in the matter of an appeal under Section 83 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912, from an order made by a District Court in a proceeding for judicial inquisition as to the alleged … short period, A narrower view has, on the other hand, been taken as to the true meaning of Section 5 of the Indian Insolvent Act, 1848 (11 and 12 Vict. c. 21): Ram Paul Singh, In re 8