Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: lunacy act 1912 section 33 · Page 1 of about 26 results (0.039 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 14 1967

Amar Nath Kapur Vs. Pran Nath Khanna

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-14-1967

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 488 and 488(5); Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 7 and 33

Reported in : 1968CriLJ1268; 3(1968)DLT15

per mensem. On 21st February 1961 the Additional District Magistrate of Delhi passed the following order, presumably under Section 33 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912, in the presence of Amar Nath Kapur and the respondent:-- 'The letter … was posted in Delhi. In June 1960, a Reception Order, as envisaged by Section 7 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912, was made by the Additional District Magistrate, Delhi, in respect of Shrimati Kamla and on 23rd June 1960

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 1962

Ranjit Kumar Ghose Vs. Secretary, Indian Psycho-analytical Society and ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-15-1962

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 491; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 3(1), 14, 15, 17, 33, 37, 38, 40, 41, 62, 63, 64, 65, 83 and 93; ;West Bengal Clinical Establishments Act, 1950 - Section 8(2)

Reported in : AIR1963Cal261,1963CriLJ579,67CWN297

to the Lumbini Park. Then also it was argued that relief could be obtained by the petitioner under Section 33 of the Lunacy Act and that was another alternative remedy. We do not think it is, because it … The petition stated in no unmistakable terms in paragraphs 15 and 16 that the whole proceedings under the Lunacy Act were entirely illegal, improper and without jurisdiction. In the prayers the petitioner asked not only for the Writ

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 1985

Clara Auroro De Brangenca and ors. Vs. Sylvia Angela Alvares and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-04-1985

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 31; Powers of Attorney Act, 1882 - Sections 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96 and 107 - Order 6, Rule 14 -Order 14, Rule 2 - Order 32, Rule 15 - Order 41, Rules 2 and 33; Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 34 and 36; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 12; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 31; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 104

Reported in : AIR1985Bom372

executed in favour of the second appellant. However, he had not been discharged under S. 34 of the Lunacy Act, 1912 and consequently, it has to be held that he had beep discharged from the Hospital only because a … The Court found that the power of attorney was not exhausted and cancellation of power of attorney under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 as void was justified. ; b) It was held that where

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 22 1917

Moni Lal Seal Vs. Nepal Chandra Pal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-22-1917

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : 43Ind.Cas.511

1. This appeal is directed against an order for inquisition made under the Lunacy Act, 1912. The proceedings were initiated on an application on the 27th March 1917 by one Nepal Chandra Pal, who … take action on the verified petition presented to him.2. As regards the first question, we observe that under Section 63 of the Lunacy Act, 1912, an application for inquisition under Section 62 may be made by any … Eldon, L.C., in Ex parte Ogle (1808) 15 Ves. (Jun) 112 : 33 E.R. 697, held that even a stranger may be permitted, in a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 1930

Ramchandra Ganpat Agarwale Vs. the Cantonment Magistrate

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-24-1930

Subject : CivilFamily

Reported in : (1930)32BOMLR606

be called upon to pay the cost of maintenance of such son, under Section 88 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912. The obligation extends quite irrespective of the quantum of share which the lunatic has in the property. It; … The lunatic was admitted in the hospital on November 20, 1926, and discharged on April 8, 1927, under Section 33 of the Lunacy Act.2. The question is, whether the appellant is a person legally bound to maintain such

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 2000

Bolabhai Hirabhai Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-20-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 76, 84, 106, 299 and 302; Evidence Act. - Sections 4, 105, 137 and 154; Mental Health Act -Sections 91, 91(3) and 94; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 328 and 329

Reported in : (2000)3GLR242

about the provisions of the Mental Health Act, 1987 (Act No.14 of 1987) which have replaced the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 and the Lunacy Act, 1977. It is an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to the … J.N. Bhatt, J.1. Whether, the appellant-accused is guilty of offence punishable under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IP Code), or his act falls within the exception under section 84 … person. It is, in this context, the provisions of section 328 and 339 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which make provisions as to accused persons

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 1990

Tippanna Ramchandra Jannu Since Decd. by His Heirs Vs. Somnath Dnyanob ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-25-1990

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 32, Rule 15; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33

Reported in : 1990(1)BomCR677

back on 26th November, 1957, his grand-father Bhagwant had instituted a petition under section 63 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 for declaring Somnath as a lunatic and for appointment of a guardian for his person as well as … living witness in a previous litigation is concerned, the law is very clear, it cannot be admissible under section 33 of the evidence Act. Because the witness is living. Over and above, the witness is a party to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 13 2023

Benny Joseph, C.No.4006 vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-13-2023

the order for detention shall be in accordance with the rules framed by the State Government under the Lunacy Act, 1912. As the Lunacy Act, 1912 has been repealed and the relevant Act in force is the Mental Healthcare … KUMAR & C.S.SUDHA, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of June, 2023JUDGMENTC.S.Sudha, J.This jail appeal under Section 383 Cr.P.C has been filed by the accused in S.C.No.357/2018 on the file of the Court of Session, … his mother to death, he is entitled to be acquitted under Section 334 Cr.P.C. as he is entitled to benefit of the exception contained in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 1923

Habibar Rahaman Vs. Saidannessa Bibi and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-28-1923

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 77Ind.Cas.949

the estate under his charge without the previous permission of the Court. Under Section 75 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912, a manager of the estate of a lunatic outside a Presidency Town cannot effect a similar alienation of … of a Wakfnama. Two years later however, Pugh, J., declined in In re Halima Khaiun 7 Ind. Cas. 33 : 37 C. 870 to assume jurisdiction as extensive as that of the kazi, and held that; in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2018

Dr. Sangamitra Acharya & Anr. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-18-2018

Subject : Education

under special circumstances‘.85. In this context, it requires to be noticed that the MHA replaced the earlier Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 (‗ILA‘) which had become outdated. Parliament acknowledged that mental illness was a curable conidtion and that the attitude … have given a copy of the W.P. (Crl) 1804 of 2017 Page 33 of 73 said psychiatric evaluation to not only the doctors at CIMBS … her fundamental rights to life, liberty, dignity and privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and Section 19 of the MHA. The Court has passed consequential orders fastening liability on each of the actors responsible

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial