Advanced Search Results

Miss. Ezlinda Fernandes Vs. Mr. Chetan Sanghi, Sub-divisional Magistra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 3, 3(5) and 13; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 1997(4)BomCR641

not a lunatic within meaning of the said expression 'Lunatic' as defined by section 3(5) of The Indian Lunacy Act, 1912. The respondents impleaded in this petition are :(1) Mr. Chetan Sanghi, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Panaji-Goa, (2) Mr. Umesh Gaonkar,

R. Lingaraj and ors. Vs. Parvathi

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 3(5) and 62

Reported in : AIR1975Mad285

ORDERNatarajan, J.1. R. Lingaraj, who has been held to be a lunatic under the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and respondents 1 to 4 in O. P. No. 169 of 1969 … of intellect and 'lunacy' as understood in the Act and it is only with 'lunatics' as defined in Section 3 (5) that the Act is concerned'. Dealing with the question as to what would amount to unsoundness of

Lakshmikutty Vs. Mohandas and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Company

Acts : Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 3, 3(11) and 63; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 6; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 16

Reported in : AIR1990Ker78

1985 before the District Court, Palghat. Company - maintainability of petition - Sections 3, 62 and 63 of Lunacy Act, 1912 and Sections 11 and 16 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - respondent-petitioners before Lower Court filed application under … court. Certainly, the locus standi depends upon the fact whether the respondents are relatives within the meaning of Section 3(11) read with Section 63 of the Act.6. The court below directed its enquiry on two questions. The court

In Re: Megal Markus Pereira

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Mental Health Act, 1987 - Sections 2; Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 7; Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 53, 54(2), 76 and 96; Indian High Courts Act, 1861; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 223; Constitution of India - Article 225; Family Courts Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 62 and 62(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2; Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 7; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 32, Rule 15

Reported in : AIR2006Bom273; 2006(6)ALLMR298

with all or any of the matters specified in this Act;In comparison, under the provisions of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912, District Court Section 3(3) was defined as under:3(3) 'District Court' means the principal civil court of original jurisdiction

Moni Lal Seal Vs. Nepal Chandra Pal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : 43Ind.Cas.511

1. This appeal is directed against an order for inquisition made under the Lunacy Act, 1912. The proceedings were initiated on an application on the 27th March 1917 by one Nepal Chandra Pal, who … Collector of the district in which it is situate The term 'relative,' as defined in Clause (11) of Section 3, includes any person related by blood, marriage or adoption The brother of the wife must, we think, be

Sm. Anima Roy Vs. Probodh Mohan Roy

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 12(1) and 12(2); ;Lunacy Act, 1912 - Section 3(5); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 102

Reported in : AIR1969Cal304,73CWN100

of lunacy. But who is a lunatic? The Hindu Marriage Act does not even define a 'lunatic'. The Lunacy Act, 4 of 1912, does, as Mr. Ghosh, appearing for the husband respondent, points out. By Section 3, Clause

Kumaravel Pillai Vs. S. Ganapathi and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 60, 60(2), 80, 82, 82(2) and 151; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rule 5; Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 41 and 41(3)

Reported in : AIR1971Mad216

This Letters Patent appeal is directed against the order of Gokulakrishnan J. in proceedings arising under the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912. The relative facts may briefly be stated for a proper appreciation of the various aspects arising in this … lunacy. Chapter IV therein deals with proceedings in lunacy in Presidency towns, such as Calcutta, Madras and Bombay. Section 60 provides for proceedings in lunacy to cease or to be set aside if court finds that the … allowed the application for reception of additional evidence in C. M. P. 3205 of 1970 filed before us. One such document sought to be filed

Kallu Daniel Vs. G.D. Hemalatha

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10 and 12; Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964 - Sections 23; Lunacy Act, 1912; Special Marriage Act, 1954

Reported in : II(2005)DMC264; ILR2005KAR2708; 2006(3)KarLJ132

Civil Judge's Courts in the State under the following Acts viz., (1) The Divorce Act, 1869, (2) The Lunacy Act, 1912 and; (3) The Special Marriage Act, 1954. This position of law has been stated in a Full Bench … Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Hubli, returning the petition of the appellant, seeking a decree of divorce filed under Section 12 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, to present it before the proper Court.2. The respondent has been

Mrs. Meera Nireshwalia Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1991CriLJ2395

fifth respondent, enough to attract the powers and duties of a police officer under section 13 of the Lunacy Act, 1912. 22. Section 13 of the Lunacy Act states, '(1) Every Officer-in-charge of a police station may arrest or … had, in the meantime, already sold the house to respondents 8 and 9 under a sale deed dated 30-9-1988 followed by an agreement between the seventh respondent on the one hand and respondents 8 and 9 on

K. Rayappa Vs. Lingappa

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 3(5), 38, 40, 41, 42, 62, 64, 65, 67 and 83

Reported in : AIR1975Kant5; ILR1974KAR1485; 1975(1)KarLJ79

1. This appeal under Section 83 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912, arises from an order of dismissal of an application preferred under Section 62 of that Act, made by … preferred under Section 62 of that Act, made by the District Judge at Tumkur in Misc. Case No. 3 of 1972.2. The application concerns the alleged idiocy or unsound ness of mind of one Koterayaswamy. The father