Advanced Search Results
Pandraj Kunjilal Sadh (Deceased) and Rai Kumar Sadh Vs. Santosh Kumari ...
Kolkata
Aug-24-2011
Land Acquisition
have jurisdiction to try any proceeding under- (i) the Guardian and Wards Act, 1980, *********** (iii) the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912, (iv) the Indian Succession Act, 1925. (4) The City Civil Court shall not have jurisdiction to try suits … of section 25, for the words “High Court”, the words “City Civil Court” shall be substituted. (2) In section 26, in sub-section (1), for the words “High Court”, the words “City Civil Court” shall be substituted. (3) In
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPandurangan Vs. Sarangapani and anr.
Chennai
Aug-19-1981
FamilyCivil
Hindu Law; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 6; Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 46; Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 8; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 26
AIR1982Mad372; (1982)1MLJ143
properties are ancestral properties in the hands of the plaintiff's father and if so whether the Hindu Succession Act 1956 is not applicable in which event the plaintiff would be entitled to half share unless the sale … a contention in the circumstances of this case, as the father, the absolute owner is very much alive.10. Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act provides that when a male Hindu died after the commencement of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGopakumar vs Madhusoodanan Nair
Kerala
Aug-21-2023
the Mental Health Act, 1987 (Section 50) and at present by Mental Healthcare Act, 2017. Under the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912, the Mental Health Act, 1987 and the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, a person suffering from mental retardation or … 21st DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 30TH SRAVANA, 1945 CRP NO. 110 OF 2017 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 26.11.2016 IN I.A.No.2245/2014 IN OS REVISION PETITIONER/1st COUNTER PETITIONER/1st DEFENDANT: GOPAKUMAR, S/o KRISHNAN NAIR, "HARISREE", T.C.4/2233(1), KAIRALI NAGAR, KOWDIAR
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Birpal Singh Vs. King Emperor
Mumbai
Mar-27-1946
Criminal
(1946)48BOMLR493
were in simili case, having regard to the provisions of Section 4 and other provisions of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912. Accordingly, on June 26, 1941, an Ordinance (No. V of 1941) was made and promulgated by His Excellency
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRavinder vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Delhi
Apr-26-2018
MRTP
been an abuse of the powers under the mental health law in this country i.e. under the Indian Lunacy Act 1912 (ILA) and later the MHA. This emphasises the need to view the mental health law as essentially concerning … be stated in the affidavit dated 12th December 2017 W.P.(C) No.3317/2017 Page 26 of 87 of Dr. Pravesh Kumar that on the basis of the … by the Duty MM and MM, the Court has, in the fourth part, undertaken a detailed analysis of Sections 23, 24 and 28 of the MHA. The Court has traced the development of the mental health law
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKhuraijam Somoi Singh Vs. State of Manipur
Guwahati
Aug-16-1996
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 4 and 105; Indian Lunacy Act, 1912; Indian Lunacy Rules; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 6, 84, 299, 302, 324 and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 335, 335(1) and 338
detained in the lunatic asylum, however, in accordance with the provisions of the Rules framed under the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912. We direct the learned Sessions Judge to follow the provisions of Section 338 of the 'Code' carefully and … respectively. D.W.1, Dr. Lourembam Surchandra Singh is a specialist in Psychiatry and he has examined the accused on 26-9-90. Dr. L. Surchandra Singh after examining the accused came to the conclusion that the accused was suffering from
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBolabhai Hirabhai Vs. State of Gujarat
Gujarat
Jun-20-2000
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 76, 84, 106, 299 and 302; Evidence Act. - Sections 4, 105, 137 and 154; Mental Health Act -Sections 91, 91(3) and 94; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 328 and 329
(2000)3GLR242
about the provisions of the Mental Health Act, 1987 (Act No.14 of 1987) which have replaced the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 and the Lunacy Act, 1977. It is an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to the … J.N. Bhatt, J.1. Whether, the appellant-accused is guilty of offence punishable under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IP Code), or his act falls within the exception under section 84
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRavi @ Raveendran vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Jan-10-2020
the order for detention shall be in accordance with the rules framed by the State Government under the Lunacy Act, 1912. As the Lunacy Act,1912 is not in force at present and it has been repealed and the relevant … in S.C.No.190 of 2015 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge-I, Kalpetta, for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 324 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'the IPC') pursuant to … Information Statement was lodged by PW1, a neighbour of the accused, on 26.10.2014 at 08.30 am, before the Station HouseOfficer, Ambalavayal police station. PW11-the Assistant
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJoseph Mathai @ Jose vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Nov-28-2019
the order for detention shall be in accordance with the rules framed by the State Government under the Lunacy Act, 1912. As the Lunacy Act, 1912 is not in force at present and it has been repealed and the … of the Additional Sessions Judge-V, Kozhikode in Crime No.199/2007 of Thiruvampady Police Station for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') for committing matricide. By judgment dated 12.1.2016, the learned
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBinu Kumar vs the State of Kerala
Kerala
Dec-06-2019
that the orderfor detention shall be in accordance with the rules framed by the State Government under the Lunacy Act, 1912. As the Lunacy Act, 1912 is not in force at present and it has been repealed and the … PWs.1 to 23 on prosecution side and Exts.P1 to P38. Mos.1 to 26 were also marked as material objects. On cross- examination,Exts.D1 to D3(b) contradictions … against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge-I, Alappuzha convicting the appellant for having committed offences punishable under Sections 449, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') and sentenced to undergo rigorous
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »