Advanced Search Results

Lakshmikutty Vs. Mohandas and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Company

Acts : Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 3, 3(11) and 63; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 6; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 16

Reported in : AIR1990Ker78

1985 before the District Court, Palghat. Company - maintainability of petition - Sections 3, 62 and 63 of Lunacy Act, 1912 and Sections 11 and 16 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - respondent-petitioners before Lower Court filed application under … in Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act that notwithstanding that a marriage is null and void under Section 11, any child of such marriage who would have been legitimate if the marriage had been valid shall be

Moni Lal Seal Vs. Nepal Chandra Pal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : 43Ind.Cas.511

1. This appeal is directed against an order for inquisition made under the Lunacy Act, 1912. The proceedings were initiated on an application on the 27th March 1917 by one Nepal Chandra Pal, who … take action on the verified petition presented to him.2. As regards the first question, we observe that under Section 63 of the Lunacy Act, 1912, an application for inquisition under Section 62 may be made by any … the expression. Eldon, L.C., in Ex parte Ogle (1808) 15 Ves. (Jun) 112 : 33 E.R. 697, held that even a stranger may be permitted,

Mrs. Meera Nireshwalia Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1991CriLJ2395

fifth respondent, enough to attract the powers and duties of a police officer under section 13 of the Lunacy Act, 1912. 22. Section 13 of the Lunacy Act states, '(1) Every Officer-in-charge of a police station may arrest or … 1989 before the Tenth Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Madras, against respondents 5, 8 and 9 and others under sections 119, 357, 354 and 506, I.P.C. read with Sections 120B, 323,448 and 455 thereof Respondents 8 and 9 moved

Kallu Daniel Vs. G.D. Hemalatha

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10 and 12; Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964 - Sections 23; Lunacy Act, 1912; Special Marriage Act, 1954

Reported in : II(2005)DMC264; ILR2005KAR2708; 2006(3)KarLJ132

Civil Judge's Courts in the State under the following Acts viz., (1) The Divorce Act, 1869, (2) The Lunacy Act, 1912 and; (3) The Special Marriage Act, 1954. This position of law has been stated in a Full Bench … Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Hubli, returning the petition of the appellant, seeking a decree of divorce filed under Section 12 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, to present it before the proper Court.2. The respondent has been

Abdul Kareem Vs. T. Gopalakrishnan Nambisan and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mental Health Act, 1987 - Sections 8 and 30; Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 3(4), 13, 15, 16 and 16(1); Panchayati Raj Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 6, 11, 97, 397 and 482

Reported in : 1990CriLJ742

Hence, the further detention was ordered in the purported exercise of some of the provisions of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 (for short 'the Act'). The purpose sought to be achieved by detaining Satyanathan is to subject him to … the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class is one among them. That court was established by virtue of Section 11 of the Code. The inherent powers of the High Court preserved by the Code do not, in fact,

Tippanna Ramchandra Jannu Since Decd. by His Heirs Vs. Somnath Dnyanob ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 32, Rule 15; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33

Reported in : 1990(1)BomCR677

back on 26th November, 1957, his grand-father Bhagwant had instituted a petition under section 63 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 for declaring Somnath as a lunatic and for appointment of a guardian for his person as well as … question, there is no good case of constructive res judicata. My attention was invited to explanation 4 of section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It is needless to state at this stage that res judicata requires

Johri and ors. Vs. Mahila Draupti Alias Dropadi and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 32, Rules 1, 4, 4A(2) and 4 - Order 41, Rule 33; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 7 and 43; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10, 11 and 23; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1991MP340; 1991(0)MPLJ217

alienate the suit land, as the transaction of sale was in violation of Section 75 of (the Indian) Lunacy Act, 1912 (for short, the 'Lunacy Act); the contract was void under S. 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 … the extent and in the manner allowed and prescribed by any law for the time being in force. Section 11 of the Contract Act speaks that every person is competent to contract who is of the age of

Miss. Ezlinda Fernandes Vs. Mr. Chetan Sanghi, Sub-divisional Magistra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 3, 3(5) and 13; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 1997(4)BomCR641

not a lunatic within meaning of the said expression 'Lunatic' as defined by section 3(5) of The Indian Lunacy Act, 1912. The respondents impleaded in this petition are :(1) Mr. Chetan Sanghi, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Panaji-Goa, (2) Mr. Umesh Gaonkar,

Gopakumar vs Madhusoodanan Nair

Court : Kerala

the Mental Health Act, 1987 (Section 50) and at present by Mental Healthcare Act, 2017. Under the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912, the Mental Health Act, 1987 and the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, a person suffering from mental retardation or … THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN MONDAY, THE 21st DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 30TH SRAVANA, 1945 CRP NO. 110 OF 2017 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 26.11.2016 IN I.A.No.2245/2014 IN OS REVISION PETITIONER/1st COUNTER PETITIONER/1st DEFENDANT: GOPAKUMAR, S/o

Joykutty Mathew Vs. Valsamma Kuruvilla

Court : Kerala

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 19 and 36; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13, 13(1) and 24

Reported in : AIR1990Ker262; I(1991)DMC479

defined in the Act, but the definition given to the term 'lunatic' in Section 3(5) of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 is adopted by the Indian Divorce Act. Under this definition an idiot is also a lunatic and is … There is absolutely no material to substantiate the allegation that she was not cooperative to have sexual life. 11. It should also be remembered that the theory of his having sex with her by putting her on