Advanced Search Results

Rangamma (Died) as Per Lrs. and ors. Vs. District Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : LimitationConstitution

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Article 226; Andhra Pradesh (T.A.) Inams Abolition Act - Sections 24; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 127

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD849

to condone the delay by taking ground mentioned by the petitioner as sufficient cause under Section 5 of Limitation Act. Accordingly I.A. No. 245/ 99 is allowed and delay of (1178) days is condoned subject to condition that … under the Act just like before the ordinary Civil Courts. The learned Counsel also had taken us through Sections 4, 10, 24 and 35 of the Act and also Rules 5 and 17 of the Rules. The

Panchsheel Electronic Corporation Vs. Jupitor General Insurance Co. Li ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 11(1975)DLT79; 1974RLR453

the part of the appellant's counsel amounted to 'sufficient cause' within the meaning of section 5 of the Limitation Act for not preferring the appeal against the decision of the Subordinate Judge 1st Class in this court within … copy of the judgment of the Sub-ordinate Judge 1st Class shows in its title that the petition under sections 20 and 8 of the Arbitration Act was valued for court fee and jurisdiction at Rs. 130.00. It

Matu Ram and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Punjab High Court Rules (Civil) Rules - Rule 4; Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 12(2) and 12(3); ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR1967Delhi58

(1) In this Letters Patent Appeal, an application has been made under Section 5, Indian Limitation Act, and under Rule 4, Part A (a), Chapter I, Vol. V. Rules and Orders of the Punjab High … (1) In this Letters Patent Appeal, an application has been made under Section 5, Indian Limitation Act, and under Rule 4, Part A (a), Chapter I, Vol. V. Rules and Orders

Vithhal Dhondiba Chawan (Died) (Through Lrs. Rajaba W/O Vithhalrao Cha ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR29; 2009(111)BomLR3258

submitted that the legislature has conferred the power to condone delay by enacting Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 in order to enable the courts to do substantial justice to parties by disposing of matters on … through the said judgment and submitted that the legislature has conferred the power to condone delay by enacting Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 in order to enable the courts to do substantial justice to

Satnam Singh and anr. Vs. Mohinder Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rule 4; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR1975Delhi104

delay should also be considered. Along with this application, C. M. 457/73 was under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, stating that on account of the reasons stated. in the application first mentioned, There was sufficient cause for … application for condoning the delay should also be considered. Along with this application, C. M. 457/73 was under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, stating that on account of the reasons stated. in the application first mentioned,

Aarohi Builders Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Shri Rajeshwar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 22, Rules 4 and 5

Reported in : 102(2003)DLT686; 2003(67)DRJ169

heirs of defendant No.1 on record and to set aside the abatement, and under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condensation of delay in filing I.A. 1197/2000.2. Defendant No.1 expired on 11.2.1999. Plaintiffs claim to have knowledge … for bringing the legal heirs of defendant No.1 on record and to set aside the abatement, and under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condensation of delay in filing I.A. 1197/2000.2. Defendant No.1 expired on 11.2.1999.

M. Narasimha Reddy and ors. Vs. Begari Samuel

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 20, Rule 5; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 123 - Schedule - Article 123

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD473; 2002(5)ALT766

the impugned order, the Court below allowed the application filed by defendant under Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act and condoned the delay of 260 days in presenting the petition under Order 9, Rule 13 CPC to … IC 1858 Overruled]. -- MAHARASHTRA EMPLOYEES OF PRIVATE SCHOOLS (CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) REGULATIONS ACT, 1978 [Act No. 3/1978]. Sections 9 & 2(21): Jurisdiction of School Tribunal Whether a School run by Cantonment Board is not a recognised

Arun Alexander Lakshman, Proprietor Alraj Builders and V.E. Arun Vs. A ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 9, Rules 7 and 13

Reported in : IV(2007)BC441; 2007(4)CTC449; (2007)5MLJ932

the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC and dismissing the Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.2. Brief facts are as follows:The appellants/Defendants entered into a joint venture Agreement in March 1998 with the respondent/ … Consequently, M.P. Nos. 1 and 2 of 2006 are closed. - LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 [C.A. No. 1/1894]. Sections 5A & 4; [P. Sathasivam, M.E.N. Patrudu & S. Manikumar, JJ] Land Acquisition (Tamil Nadu) Rules, Rule 4

Hanoman Prasad Mishra Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1027

is axiomatic that condonation of delay is a matter of discretion of the Court. Section 5 of the Limitation Act does not say that such discretion can be exercised only if the delay is within a certain limit. … as follows :'9.. It is axiomatic that condonation of delay is a matter of discretion of the Court. Section 5 of the Limitation Act does not say that such discretion can be exercised only if the delay

N. Sengottaiyan and Another Vs. Shanmughavadivu and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

to file their written statemen. Hence, they were set exparte. 15. Admittedly, as per Section 5 of the Limitation Act, this petitioners / defendants 2 and 3 should have filed the application for setting aside the exparte decree … they have not chosen to file their written statemen. Hence, they were set exparte. 15. Admittedly, as per Section 5 of the Limitation Act, this petitioners / defendants 2 and 3 should have filed the application for