Advanced Search Results

Cancer Relief Society, Rashtra Sant Tukdoji Cancer Hospital and Resear ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 4, 7(4) and 7(7); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2004(3)ALLMR79; [2004(102)FLR1160]; (2004)IIILLJ862Bom; 2004(3)MhLj572

The short question involved in this petition is whether the provisions of Section 4 to 24 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act of 1963') are applicable to an appeal preferred under Section … Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act of 1963') are applicable to an appeal preferred under Section 7(7) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.3. Before considering the facts of the case, it is necessary to

Smt. Bhagyamma and ors. Vs. Smt. Ningarama and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 7; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 8, 8(3) and 12; Hindu Succession Act; Mitrakshara Law

Reported in : ILR2009KAR118; 2009(4)KarLJ404; 2009(1)KCCR410; 2009(4)KLJ404; 2009(2)AIRKarR14; AIR2009NOC1272.

which would operate against plaintiffs No. 3 & 4 as well, in terms of Section 7 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The court has placed reliance on the decision in Narayan Ramchandra Kalkar v. Arjun Bhimrao Gore and

Mangu Ram Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 417(3) and 417(4)

Reported in : AIR1976SC105; 1976CriLJ179; (1976)78PLR274; (1976)1SCC392; [1976]2SCR260

is concluded against the petitioner by the language of the new statutory enactment in Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963, we thought that it would be a futile exercise to grant special leave and then hear the … M/s. Ram Parshad Gondamal in the Court of the Judicial Megistrate, 1st Class, Delhi for an offence under Section 7 read with Section 16 of the Prevention of Food 'Adulteration Act 1954. These two complaints were (sic) dated,

Gopi Nath Vs. Satish Chandra

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CommercialLimitation

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 46; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 6 and 7 - Article 106; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 157; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 88

Reported in : AIR1964All53

Ram Ratan could give a valid discharge to the defendant within the meaning of Section 7 of the Limitation Act yet his failure to do so could not bar the suit inasmuch as a fresh agreement came into

T. Kunhammad and Ors. Vs. M. Narayanan Nambudiri's Son Narayanan Nambu ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 6 and 7 - Schedules - Articles 142 and 144; Madras Nambudiri Act, 1933 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR1964Ker8

time, the plaintiff was over 21 years of age, and therefore, the benefit of Section 6 of the Limitation Act was exhausted. Under Section 22 of the Limitation Act, where, after the institution of a suit, a new … the normal period allowed by law for the suit is less, that period, - after attainment of majority. Section 7 is a proviso to Section 6 restricting its scope. It reads :''Where one of several persons jointly entitled

Posani Subbaiah Vs. Doppalalpudi Chilakamma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Hindu Succession Act; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 7; Evidence Act - Sections 13 and 32(5); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 122

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD370; 2004(2)ALT475

Court directs both the parties to bear their own costs. Civil - negligence by guardians - Hindu Succession Act, Section 7 of Limitation Act, 1963, Sections 13 and 32 of Evidence Act and Section 122 of Transfer of Property

Ponnayee and ors. Vs. Perumayee and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20; Limitation Act, 1965 - Sections 6 and 7

Reported in : (2000)1MLJ282

behalf of the minor daughter also within time and failure of filing the suit within the said period. Section 7 of the Limitation Act would certainly attract, as the period of time will run not only against the … against both the findings relating to the entitlement of permanent injunction and maintainability of the suit under the Limitation Act, this Court at the time of admission, formulated only one substantial question of law in both these appeals

Murlidhar Laxman Vs. Shivram Sadashiv Patil

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilLimitation

Reported in : (1929)31BOMLR963; 121Ind.Cas.446

a valid discbarge and Murlidhar was not therefore entitled to the benefit of Section 7 of the Indian Limitation Act, In appeal the learned District Judge, while holding the alleged payment in 1922 not proved, held, chiefly on

Maimoona Khatun and anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 102; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 7; Fundamental Rules - Rule 54; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80

Reported in : AIR1980SC1773; [1980(41)FLR307]; (1980)IILLJ164SC; (1980)3SCC578; [1980]3SCR676; 1980(12)LC557(SC)

contended before the High Court that the suit was barred by limitation under Article 102 of the Indian Limitation Act (Act IX of 1908), as it then stood. The central dispute between the parties in the High Court … then posted at Mathura on the 15th of February 1956. On January, 7, 1957, however, the employee suddenly fell ill at Budaun and died on … of the salary of the employee were not paid and hence the present plaintiffs after giving notice, Under Section 80 of the CPC, to the Government brought the present suit for recovery of Rs. 3035-5-0. The Civil

Mulchand Panachand Gujar Vs. Kesari Khupchand Gujar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : (1910)12BOMLR682

is also argued that under Section 8 of the Limitation Act of 1877, or, at all events under Section 7 of the Limitation Act of 1908, the elder decree-holder, Kesari, could from the time of her attainment of … v. Sundar ILR (1899) All 199, that by reason of the first explanation of Article 179 of the Limitation Act an application, made by a representative of one of joint decree-holders, takes effect in favour of all; therefore,