Advanced Search Results

State of U.P. Vs. Maharaj NaraIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 12(2) - Schedule - Article 157

Reported in : AIR1965All443; 1965CriLJ338

the date of the order appealed against, was, therefore, within time if 50 days could be excluded under Section 12 of the Indian Limitation Act as 'time requisite' for obtaining a copy of the order appealed against. An … the appeal is outside 90 days' time prescribed under Article 157 of the 1st Schedule of the Indian Limitation Act.2. This appeal was 61ed on 29th March 1963, i.e., 139 days after the date of the order appealed

V. Sivalingam Vs. Dakshinamurthy and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 12(2); Kerala Civil Practice Rules - Rule 242

Reported in : AIR1993Ker83

of time requisite for obtaining a copy of the decree is provided for by Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act. Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act reads :'12. Exclusion of time in legal proceedings. (2) In computing the period

Syed QamanuddIn Ahmed Vs. the Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisiti ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 12 and 12(2)

Reported in : AIR1981AP371

the objection raised by the office is that this period cannot be excluded under Section 12 of the Limitation Act.3. We requested Mr. S. R. Ashok to act as amicus curiae in this case and after hearing the

Jayashankar Mulshankar and anr. Vs. Mayabhai Lalbhai

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 12 and 12(2)

Reported in : AIR1952Bom122; (1952)54BOMLR11; ILR1952Bom514

between the pronouncement of the judgment and the signing of the decree should be excluded under Section 12(2), Limitation Act, and it it is to be excluded whether it should be excluded wholly or should be excluded under

Capstan Meter (India) Ltd. Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 12 and 12(2); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18

Reported in : AIR1974Raj63; 1973()WLN762

contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that by virtue of Section 29 of the Indian Limitation Act the applicability of Section 12 of the Limitation Act is not excluded in the present case. It has

Punni Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 12(2) and 29(2); Uttar Prdesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 83(1), 85 and 89

Reported in : AIR1971All387

Munsitf held that no such exclusion could be made as the provision in Section 12(2) of the Indian Limitation Act which permits the exclusion of time taken in obtaining a copy of the order sought to be revised

Keshar Sugar Works Vs. R.C. Sharma and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 12 and 12(2)

Reported in : AIR1951All122

the date of the signing of the decree, can be excluded within the meaning of Section 12 (2), Limitation Act. Section 12 (2) runs as follows :Section 12 (2) In computing the period of limitation prescribed for an appeal, an

Sehat Ali Khan and anr. Vs. Abdul Qavi Khan and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 12(2) and 29(2); Allahabad High Court Rules - Rule 7; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1956All273

of limitation is prescribed by a special or local law which is not in 'pari materia' with the Limitation Act, Section 12 of the Indian Limitation Act or other sections laying down general principles for computation of the period of

Udayan Chinubhai Vs. R.C. Bali

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 12 and 12(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , - Order 20, Rule 7

Reported in : 1977MhLJ892(SC); [1978]1SCR547; 1977(9)LC633(SC)

dismissed the appeal as time barred and also refused to condone the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.2. The defendant is the appellant before us. The plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for rendition of accounts in … delivery on June 11, 1976.8. The first question that arises for decision in this appeal is whether under Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963, read with the Explanation, the appellant is entitled to exclude the time commencing

Udayan Chinubhai Vs. R. C. Bali.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5, 12(2), Article 116(a)

dismissed the appeal as time barred and also refused to condone the delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.The defendant is the appellant before us.' The plaintiff- respondent filed a suit for rendition of accounts in … for delivery on June 11, 1976.The first question that arises for decision in this appeal is whether under section 12(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963, read with the Explanation, the appellant is entitled to exclude the time commencing