Advanced Search Results
Krishnan Madhavan Vs. Narayanan Jayadevan and anr.
Kerala
Feb-18-1974
CommercialLimitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 37
AIR1975Ker18
years prior to the date of suit.....'In this case, the waiver in terms of Article 37 of the Limitation Act, 1963, having not been proved, it is not necessary to consider the correctness of the observation contained in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamgopal Commercial Corporation Vs. Gandubilli Venkata Ramana Murthy a ...
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-28-1999
ContractLimitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 37, 75 and 113
2000(1)ALD615; 2000(1)ALT769
appreciation of the issue involved in the appeal it is appropriate to refer to Article 37 of the Limitation Act, 1963, which reads as follows:Description of suitsPeriod of ImitationTime from which period beginsto run 37.On a promissory noteor bond
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Bank of India, Super Market Branch, Gulbarga Vs. Ravindra
Karnataka
May-28-1999
BankingLimitation
Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 15, 36 and 37; Karnataka Small Cause Courts Act - Sections 18; Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Articles 74 and 75; Constitution of India - Article 132
1999(5)KarLJ108
Court below misconstrued Article 37 as well as failed to appreciate the principle under Article 37 of the Limitation Act, 1963. In support of his contentions, the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner made reference to the following decisions:1.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Durgaram Prasad
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-08-1983
ArbitrationLimitation
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 37; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 29(2) - Schedule - Article 119; Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21
AIR1984AP14
passed in terms thereof is O. S. 133/1979.2. The learned Government Pleader contended that Section 5 of the Limitation Act 1963 is applicable in the circumstances as Section 5 is wide in its sweep and by its own force … Act and as such the court has no discretion to extend the time and the time stipulated under Article 119 (b) of the Limitation Act should be adhered to and the extension sought for is not valid. … time in its discretion. The learned counsel fore respondents contended that Section 37 of the Arbitration Act totally excluded the applicability of Section 5 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKochappan and ors. Vs. the Official Liquidator, Palmland Corpn. (P) Lt ...
Kerala
Mar-31-1977
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 37
AIR1977Ker201
on the terms of the bond, the whole balance payable became due and under Article 37 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the suit filed beyond three years of the default is barred by limitation. The provision in the bond,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation, Cauvery Project, Group General M ...
Chennai
Jun-29-1998
Arbitration
Constitution of India -- Article 227; Limitation Act, 1963 -- Article 127, 137; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 -- Sections 8, 11, 20, 37 (3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 16; English Arbitration Act, 1996 -- Sections 13 and 14
AIR1998Mad363; 1998(2)CTC419
considered on the basis of pleadings. It is not disputed by either party that Article 127 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies inview of Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Section 37(3) of that Act provides as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPunjab National Bank Vs. Ishwar Prasad Tiwari and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-21-1992
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 37
1994(0)MPLJ411
paragraph 15 of its impugned judgment, the trial Court came to the conclusion that Article 36 of the Limitation Act, 1963, would be applicable in the present case, as there was no pleading or recital in the promissory note … period of instalments fixed as aforesaid.' In this view of the matter, I am of the view that Article 37 of the Limitation Act would be applicable in the present case, which provides as follows :-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Art. Description of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVastava Chit Funds (Private) Ltd. Vs. Madala Benarjee and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-02-2005
Limitation
Companies Act, 1956; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 37; Andhra Pradesh Chit Funds Act - Sections 2, 6 and 25(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100; Constitution of India
2005(3)ALD881; 2005(3)ALT405; III(2005)BC546
Court, sitting under Sec. 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, while dealing with Article 37 of the Limitation Act, 1963, held that in a suit based on chit transactions, the limitation and cause of action would arise only
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhagwantrao Deorao Patil Vs. Mohammad Khan Asgar Khan
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-06-1977
Commercial
Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 37; Interest Act, 1839 - Sections 2
AIR1977MP270; 1977MPLJ290
shall be due, the case will be governed by Article 36 and not by Article 37 of the Limitation Act, 1963. In this view of the matter it further held that the cause of action in respect of each
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHimachal Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Man ...
Himachal Pradesh
Apr-19-2000
Commercial
State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Section 29; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 37
[2002]111CompCas763(HP)
in order not only to plead but prove the same. Proceeding on this premise article 37 of the Limitation Act, 1963, straightaway comes into play, according to which the period of limitation is three years in respect of a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »