Advanced Search Results
Katragadda Ramayya and anr. Vs. Kolli Nageswararao and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-25-1967
CivilLimitation
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 5, 46 and 48 - Order, 7, Rule 7 - Order 21, Rule 53; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 4, 9, 15, 18, 19, 22, 29 and 29(2) - Schedule - Articles 181 and 182; ;Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938
AIR1969AP250
case to a Full Bench because not only a question as to whether Sec. 19 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Limitation Act') controls Section 48, Civil P.C. but also in addition, other questions … 5, 46 and 48, Order 7 Rule 7 and Order 21 Rule 53 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Sections 4, 9, 15, 18, 19, 22, 29 and 29 (2) and Articles 181 and 182 of Schedule to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Official Receiver, Guntur Vs. Canara Industrial Banking Syndicate, ...
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-26-1974
Civil
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19 - Schedule - Article 182; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Sections 28(6)
AIR1975AP178
and decided in the subsequent proceedings, i. e. I. A. No. 1009/ 1966.14. Under Article 182 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the time-limit for execut-ing a decree is three years, when the certified copy of the decree is not … by a party against whom such property or right is claimed. This difference in language, between those two sections, has to be borne in mind in deciding this case.38. There is no doubt that the words 'a … this Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is, whether E. P. No 384 of 1963 is barred by time and inexecut-able against the mortgaged property.2. The material
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. P.V. Jagannath Rao
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-14-1968
ServiceLimitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19 - Schedule - Article 102; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 240; Constitution of India - Article 311; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34 - Order 2, Rule 2
AIR1968MP204; (1968)IILLJ792MP
was barred by limitation. Both parties are agreed that the relevant provision applicable is Article 102 of the Limitation Act. 1908 The disagreement is about the commencement of the period of limitation. According to the appellant the salary becomes … respondent's services was declared to be invalid and void being in violation of Clauses (2) and (3) of Section 240 of the Government of India Act, 1935. After the decision of the High Court, the respondent was … Singh, J. 1. The respondent entered service as a Guard in 1941 in the Bengal Nagpur Railway and after nationalization of Railways in 1944,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mrs. Florence Misra and ors. Vs. Daulat Ram and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-20-1967
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19
AIR1968All316
as the receipt being an acknowledgment of the previous debt within the meaning of Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1908 is concerned. In the case before us we are not concerned with the question whether the receipt Ext. … as the receipt did not acknowledge the earlier debt it could not be construed as an acknowledgment under Section 19 of the Limitation Act was rejected. The judgment states:--'The receipt does not state whether the stun of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Mool Chand Wahi
Allahabad
Mar-24-1972
Limitation
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 2, Rule 2; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19(1); Constitution of India - Article 166
AIR1972All413
entire claim was within limitation as the limitation was saved by virtue of Section 19 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908. It held that the letter written by the Assistant General Manager on 6-2-1958 which was Exhibit 7 in … that the suit for the entire claim was within limitation as the limitation was saved by virtue of Section 19 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908. It held that the letter written by the Assistant General Manager
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBeni Madhav (Deceased by L. Rs.) and anr. Vs. Smt. Chameli Devi (Decea ...
Allahabad
Sep-04-1984
FamilyLimitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19 - Schedule - Article 132
AIR1985All89
claim is within limitation in view of the acknowledgment made by Dr. Laxmi Narain mortgagor as contemplated under section 19 of the Limitation Act 1908. In this connection the reliance placed by him is on the certified … the Sub-Registrar. The limitation in this case is governed by Article 132 of the Schedule to the old Limitation Act, 1908. Under this provision, the suit could be brought within three years commencing from the date when the money
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRadha Krishna Vs. Anoop Chand and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-29-1973
LimitationProperty
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19 and 20(2)
AIR1973MP248; 1973MPLJ103
is whether the suit is within time by application of Section 20 (2) and Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1908, which was in force when the suit was instituted.10. The mortgagees were in possession of the suit house. … by time.9. The only question in this appeal is whether the suit is within time by application of Section 20 (2) and Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1908, which was in force when the suit was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovindram Mihamal Vs. Chetumal Villardas
Mumbai
Jun-30-1969
CommercialLimitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19; Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 35 - Schedule - Article 1; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6 and 30; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Money lenders Act; Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3(2) and 3(3); Hindu Law; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 52; Specific Relief Act - Sections 15
AIR1970Bom251; (1970)72BOMLR653; 1970MhLJ59
the Stamp Act but is otherwise an acknowledgment of the debt saving limitation under Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the insufficiency or want of stamp is irrelevant and the document-would still be admissible for proving the acknowledgment.8. … file an appeal in Letters Patent, The prayer is granted.30. Appeal dismissed. Hindu Succession Act (XXX of 1956), Sections 6, 19, 30 - Effect of proviso to Section 6--Distinction between acknowledgment under Indian Limitation Act (IX of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLakshmirattan Cotton Mills Co.Ltd. and Behari Lal Ram Charan Vs. the A ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-16-1970
CivilLimitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19; Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 18
AIR1971SC1482; (1971)1SCC67; [1971]2SCR623
that the said letter did not amount to an acknowledgement within the meaning of Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1908 which was then applicable to the suits, and lastly, that even if the said letter did amount to … were barred by limitation, that the said letter did not amount to an acknowledgement within the meaning of Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1908 which was then applicable to the suits, and lastly, that even if
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaranappa Naicker Vs. Ramalingam Pillai and ors.
Chennai
Feb-17-1950
PropertyCivil
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19
AIR1950Mad553; (1950)IIMLJ13
bind by an acknowledgment under Section 19 or by a payment of principal or interest under Section 20, Limitation Act, 1908, the person on whom his interest has devolved, whether the devolution is of the whole of the mortgaged … to the charge, can be binding on the charge-holder or her legal representative. The contention is that under Section 19, Limitation Act, defendant 5 or her legal representative, respondent 22, cannot be treated as a person deriving
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »