Advanced Search Results
Valliamma Champaka Pillai Vs. Sivathanu Pillai and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-24-1979
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 144 and 148; Travancore Limitation Regulations - Articles 132 and 136; Transfer of Property Act, 1882
AIR1979SC1937; (1979)4SCC429; [1980]1SCR354; 1980(12)LC312(SC)
is in the position of a non-redeeming co-mortgagor, would have, only a period of 12 years limitation under Article 144 of the Limitation Apt, 1908, and that Article 148 of that Act (corresponding to Article 136 of the … co-mortgagor is 50 years under Article 136 of the Travancore Limitation Regulation (corresponding to Article 148 of the Limitation Act, 1908) and that the starting point of limitation is the date of redemption by the redeeming co-mortgagor. He reasoned
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPandya Vinodrai Ramrai Vs. Lavar Prabhudas Nathuram and ors.
Gujarat
Jun-16-1971
PropertyLimitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 28 - Schedule - Article 144; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 59
AIR1972Guj204
acquired limited interest as a mortgagee by prescription under Section 28 read with Article 144 of the Indian Limitation Act. 1908 and, therefore, even though the mortgage deed was not registered according to law in force at that time,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsharfi Devi and ors. Vs. Prem Chand and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-04-1971
PropertyLimitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 144; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3 and 5
AIR1971All457
the appellants contended that the suit would be covered either by! Article 134-B or Article 144 of the Limitation Act. 1908 which would govern this case. It would be better to mention a few farts before we consider which
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Surajmal and anr. Vs. Mangilal and anr.
Rajasthan
Jan-10-1977
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 142 and 144; Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 31 - Schedule - Article 64
AIR1978Raj22; 1977()WLN22
on title as well as on the assertion of prior possession and subsequent dispossession or discontinuance of possession, Article 144 of the Limitation Act, 1908, and not Article 142 thereof applied? The subject-matter in litigation is a house … the view taken in 1971 Raj LW 492 require reconsideration regarding the applicability of Article 142 of the Limitation Act, 1908, on account of the legislative changes brought about by Articles 64 and 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963?
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNandlal Sakharam Vs. Babu Bhika and Others
Mumbai
Jul-31-1996
Property
Berar Land Revenue Code, 1928 - Sections 55 and 74(2); M.P. Abolition of Proprietory Rights, Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 3(1), 4, 68 and 69; Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 31 and 112 - Article 65; Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 141, 142 and 144; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 107; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2; Government Grant Act, 1895; Punjab Occupancy Tenants (Vesting of Proprietary Rights) Act, 1953
1998(2)BomCR392
learned Advocate, the limitation for filing of the suit by the plaintiff was under Article 142 of the Limitation Act, 1908 and, therefore, that period of limitation has expired prior to coming into force of the Limitation Act, 1963 … Therefore, it was contended that the suit is barred by limitation. The learned Counsel also pointed out that Article 144 of the old Act also provides the limitation of 12 years for possession of immovable property or any
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskQadir Bux Vs. Ramchand and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-19-1969
PropertyLimitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 123 to 143 and 144
AIR1970All289
in permissive user of the property. It was held that Article 144 of the First Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1908, applied to the facts of the case.32. The Nagpur High Court in the case of Meherban Lalli v.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalooram and anr. Vs. Mangilal
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-02-1984
Limitation
Limitation act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 142 and 144; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104
AIR1984MP147
the admission of the defendants that parties were in joint possession of the suit property, the provisions of Article 144 of the Limitation Act, 1908 were attracted and that as the defendants had failed to establish that they … suit, the plaintiffs suit was barred by limitation by virtue of the provisions of Article 142 of the Limitation Act, 1908. In this view of the matter, the trial Court dismissed the plaintiffs suit. On appeal, the lower appellate
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamanand and anr. Vs. Smt. Premvati and anr.
Allahabad
Apr-05-1972
PropertyLimitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 136 and 144; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 64 and 66
AIR1973All105
on the date of sale. The present suit will thus squarely be covered by Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Article 144 of the Limitation Act itself says that it would apply only to a suit for possession of immovable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFeroza Begam and ors. Vs. Dewan Daulat Rai Kapoor and ors.
Delhi
Dec-18-1973
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 83 - Order 6, Rule 17; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 142 and 144
AIR1975Delhi1
own voluntary act of discontinuance of his such possession. The suit is governed by Article 142 of the Limitation Act, 1908 read with Section 31 of the Limitation Act of 1963.'16. The applicability of the Article would have to … become owners of the suit property by adverse possession. The suit will clearly fall within the ambit of Article 144 of the Limitation Act, 1908.18. For the foregoing reasons I find no merit in the applications that are
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOuseph Chacko Vs. Krishna Pillai Govinda Pillai
Kerala
Jul-19-1957
PropertyLimitation
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 103; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 11A, 137, 142 and 144
AIR1958Ker22
Article 142 of the Limitation Act should not in any event have been applied and it was only Article 144 that was applicable and that even assuming Article 142 could apply, the period between the date of the … The suit cannot therefore be taken to offend the one year's rule under Article 11-A of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908.9. We now come to the question whether, the lower Court was right in holding that the suit brought
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »