Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Act1: lighthouse act 1927 section 9 · Page 1 of about 1 results (0.014 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Jan 19 2021

M/S Seahorse Ship Agencies Pvt. Ltd., vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

would submit that thedual payment made by the petitioner cannot be treated as excess payment as contemplated under Section 9 of the Lighthouse Act, 1927. Therefore, statutory limitation for claiming excess payment would not be applicable to the … 05.10.2018, on the ground that the claim was made after the period of six months prescribed under the Lighthouse Act, 1927. The petitioner, aggrieved by Ext.P5, submitted Ext.P6 application before the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) on 15.10.2018. On the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales