Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: lighthouse act 1927 section 7 · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.006 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 19 2021

M/S Seahorse Ship Agencies Pvt. Ltd., vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

05.10.2018, on the ground that the claim was made after the period of six months prescribed under the Lighthouse Act, 1927. The petitioner, aggrieved by Ext.P5, submitted Ext.P6 application before the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) on 15.10.2018. On the … would submit that thedual payment made by the petitioner cannot be treated as excess payment as contemplated under Section 9 of the Lighthouse Act, 1927. Therefore, statutory limitation for claiming excess payment would not be applicable to … paid under a mistake of law could be claimed based on Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The court examined the scope of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 2021

Commissioner of Customs, vs M/S. Seashore Ship Agencies Pvt Ltd.,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-09-2021

19.1.2021 by which, after considering the main issue, as to whether an application under Section 19 of the Lighthouse Act, 1927 is applicable to the case on hand, where dual payment has been made by the writ petitioner, and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 1941

international Railway Co. Vs. Niagara Parks Commission

Court : Privy Council

Decided on : Apr-28-1941

Subject : Land Acquisition

a further Act of the Legislature for Ontario passed in the year 1927 (17 Geo. V.C. 24 re- enacted in the Revised Statutes for Ontario … than an amalgamation by authority of State of a vast number of bodies having general authority over the lighthouses and beacons and buoys throughout the country for the general convenience. It is a corporation with very great … Lord Justice Luxmoore: On 29th August 1938 the International Railway Company (hereinafter called "the Appellant Company") instituted an action in the Supreme Court of Ontario against the Niagara Parks Commission (hereinafter called "the Commission") to recover $227,538.22 … company referred to in the 1891 agreement was incorporated and by subsequent sections the necessary powers were conferred on this company to enable it to … by Day J. in (1886) 17 QB D 795.(3)In his judgment in that case Day J. said

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial