Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: lighthouse act 1927 section 21 · Page 1 of about 2 results (0.018 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 09 2021

Commissioner of Customs, vs M/S. Seashore Ship Agencies Pvt Ltd.,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-09-2021

19.1.2021 by which, after considering the main issue, as to whether an application under Section 19 of the Lighthouse Act, 1927 is applicable to the case on hand, where dual payment has been made by the writ petitioner, and … and after considering various provisions of the Lighthouse Act and decisions, ultimately writ court at paragraphs 19 to 21, ordered thus:“19. The dual payment made by the petitioner in this writ petition cannot be described as excess

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

M/S Seahorse Ship Agencies Pvt. Ltd., vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

05.10.2018, on the ground that the claim was made after the period of six months prescribed under the Lighthouse Act, 1927. The petitioner, aggrieved by Ext.P5, submitted Ext.P6 application before the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) on 15.10.2018. On the … would submit that thedual payment made by the petitioner cannot be treated as excess payment as contemplated under Section 9 of the Lighthouse Act, 1927. Therefore, statutory limitation for claiming excess payment would not be applicable to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial