Advanced Search Results
M/S Seahorse Ship Agencies Pvt. Ltd., vs Union of India
Kerala
Jan-19-2021
05.10.2018, on the ground that the claim was made after the period of six months prescribed under the Lighthouse Act, 1927. The petitioner, aggrieved by Ext.P5, submitted Ext.P6 application before the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) on 15.10.2018. On the … would submit that thedual payment made by the petitioner cannot be treated as excess payment as contemplated under Section 9 of the Lighthouse Act, 1927. Therefore, statutory limitation for claiming excess payment would not be applicable to … theHon'ble Apex Court in State of Kerala v. Aluminium Industries Ltd. [(1965) 16 STC 689]. A levy was made in violation of Article 286(1)(a) of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinternational Railway Co. Vs. Niagara Parks Commission
Privy Council
Apr-28-1941
Land Acquisition
a further Act of the Legislature for Ontario passed in the year 1927 (17 Geo. V.C. 24 re- enacted in the Revised Statutes for Ontario … not later than 1st September 1892. By cls. 16 to 19 inclusive, the company's right to operate … than an amalgamation by authority of State of a vast number of bodies having general authority over the lighthouses and beacons and buoys throughout the country for the general convenience. It is a corporation with very great … Lord Justice Luxmoore: On 29th August 1938 the International Railway Company (hereinafter called "the Appellant Company") instituted an action in the Supreme Court of Ontario against the Niagara Parks Commission (hereinafter called "the Commission") to recover $227,538.22 … company referred to in the 1891 agreement was incorporated and by subsequent sections the necessary powers were conferred on this company to enable it to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›