Advanced Search Results

M/S Seahorse Ship Agencies Pvt. Ltd., vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

05.10.2018, on the ground that the claim was made after the period of six months prescribed under the Lighthouse Act, 1927. The petitioner, aggrieved by Ext.P5, submitted Ext.P6 application before the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) on 15.10.2018. On the … would submit that thedual payment made by the petitioner cannot be treated as excess payment as contemplated under Section 9 of the Lighthouse Act, 1927. Therefore, statutory limitation for claiming excess payment would not be applicable to

international Railway Co. Vs. Niagara Parks Commission

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Land Acquisition

a further Act of the Legislature for Ontario passed in the year 1927 (17 Geo. V.C. 24 re- enacted in the Revised Statutes for Ontario … to meet the development of traffic. By cl. 15 the company undertook to build the railway in … than an amalgamation by authority of State of a vast number of bodies having general authority over the lighthouses and beacons and buoys throughout the country for the general convenience. It is a corporation with very great … Lord Justice Luxmoore: On 29th August 1938 the International Railway Company (hereinafter called "the Appellant Company") instituted an action in the Supreme Court of Ontario against the Niagara Parks Commission (hereinafter called "the Commission") to recover $227,538.22 … company referred to in the 1891 agreement was incorporated and by subsequent sections the necessary powers were conferred on this company to enable it to