Advanced Search Results
Emperor Vs. Chota Singh
Chennai
Dec-22-1908
Criminal
3Ind.Cas.885
the difference between a Presidency Magistrate and District Magistrate or Magistrate of the first class. Thus, in the Lepers Act III of 1898, it was considered necessary in Section 2 (5) to define 'District Magistrate' as including a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.S. Girl Rao Vs. Hind Kusht Niwaran Sangh and ors.
Delhi
Apr-01-1982
ServiceConstitution
Societies Registration Act, 1870; Companies Act, 1956; ;Societies Registration Act, 1860; Constitution of India - Article 12; Parliament Act; Lepers Act, 1898 - Sections 3 and 5
AIR1982Delhi446; 22(1982)DLT23
Sangh as a State within Article 12 of the Constitution.(14) Reference by Mr. Charya to Section 3 of Lepers Act. 1898 is inapposite because there is no notification designating any Homes which are being run by the Sangh as … the termination of his services by a memo of 13-10-1980 was with a view to appoint respondent No. 2, at the initiative of the Secretary of respondent No. 1. Allegations are made that the respondent No. 2
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhirendra Pandua Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-19-2008
Election
Orissa Municipal Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 16, 16(1), 17, 17(1), 18, 19, 29 and 38; Lepers Act, 1898; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 136
AIR2009SC163; 2008(56)BLJR3078; JT2008(10)SC347; (2008)8MLJ624(SC); 2008(12)SCALE612; 2008(5)LH(SC)3594; MANU/SC/4096/2008
of Leprosy, appointed by the Government of India, many State Governments and Union Territories have repealed the antiquated Lepers Act, 1898 and subsequent similar State Acts, providing for the segregation and medical treatment of pauper lepers suffering from infectious … the writ petition, preferred by the appellant assailing the decision of the Election Tribunal-cum-District Judge, Balasore, passed under Section 38 of the Orissa Municipal Act, 1950 (for short `the Act').3. The appellant as well as respondent No. … special leave, is directed against the judgment and order dated 7th October, 2005 rendered by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in W.P. (C)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Pankaj Sinha Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-14-2018
Land Acquisition
the Government of India, many State Governments and Union Territories have repealed 1 (2008) 17 SCC31111 the antiquated Lepers Act, 1898 and subsequent similar State Acts, providing for the segregation and medical treatment of pauper lepers suffering from infectious … by the statute in question and cannot be said to be unreasonable or arbitrary. Accordingly, we hold that Sections 16(l)(iv) and 17 (l)(b) of the Act are not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.30. Before parting … public domain the reports of National Sample Survey on Leprosy conducted in 2010-2011 and further to conduct regular and sustainable massive awareness campaigns for the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Aski.C. Chakravarty Vs. Khasi Hills District Council
Guwahati
Jun-14-1983
Constitution
Constitution of India; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Autonomous District (Administration of Justice) Rules, 1953 - Rule 1
the property of the Mylliem State). 4. The Glanders and Farcy Act, 1899 (XIII of 1899). 5. The Lepers Act, 1898 (III of 1898). 6. The Assam Medical Act (I of 1916). 7. The Indian Post. Office Act, 1898 … at a meeting, the Government of Assam was pleased in exercise of the power vested in them by Sub-Section (2) of Section 5 of the Assam Municipal Act, 1923 (1) of 1923), to revise the boundaries of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Vs. Sindhi Alias Raman, S/O Dalwai Alias Raghav
Mumbai
Aug-04-1987
Criminal
1987(3)BomCR570; (1987)89BOMLR423
March 5, 1907).(5) Surgeon to the Coroner of Bombay. (G.R.J.D. No. 3246, dated January 10, 1910).(6) Inspector of Lepers. (G.R.G.D. No. 1798, dated March 7, 1914).26. The post of the Police Surgeon of Bombay is equivalent to … debate in England. The question specifically arose in R. v. Windle (1952) 2 All. E.R. 1 Lord Goddard, Chief Justice, delivering the judgment of the … find in a particular person, that person is able to recognise the nature and the quality of the act for which he is tried or if he is capable of knowing that what he was doing was … per the provisions of Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898.23. The reference came up for hearing before the Division Bench of this
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRao Bahadur A.T. Pannirselvam Vs. A. Veeriah Vandayar and anr.
Chennai
Oct-29-1930
Civil
(1931)60MLJ191
happens a year later, for the new elections. If he were discovered to be a deaf-mute or a leper, if he were discovered to have been an adjudicated insolvent, if he had any other of the disqualifications … of September the Subordinate Judge had lost jurisdiction to deal with the petition in consequence of a new Act, which had come into force, Act XI of 1930.' There is no dispute that at the time when … Mr. Veeriah Vandayar instituted his election petition. Among other things it repeals Section 13 of the Act of 1920, under which no salaried officer of … he lost jurisdiction until the new Act came into force on the 26th August, 1930. The Subordinate* Judge found that the election of Mr. Pannirselvam,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›