Advanced Search Results

Dhirendra Pandua Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Orissa Municipal Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 16, 16(1), 17, 17(1), 18, 19, 29 and 38; Lepers Act, 1898; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 136

Reported in : AIR2009SC163; 2008(56)BLJR3078; JT2008(10)SC347; (2008)8MLJ624(SC); 2008(12)SCALE612; 2008(5)LH(SC)3594; MANU/SC/4096/2008

of Leprosy, appointed by the Government of India, many State Governments and Union Territories have repealed the antiquated Lepers Act, 1898 and subsequent similar State Acts, providing for the segregation and medical treatment of pauper lepers suffering from infectious … and 17 of the Act are discriminatory and, thus, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. During the course of hearing, without much elaboration, learned … the writ petition, preferred by the appellant assailing the decision of the Election Tribunal-cum-District Judge, Balasore, passed under Section 38 of the Orissa Municipal Act, 1950 (for short `the Act').3. The appellant as well as respondent No.

J.S. Girl Rao Vs. Hind Kusht Niwaran Sangh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1870; Companies Act, 1956; ;Societies Registration Act, 1860; Constitution of India - Article 12; Parliament Act; Lepers Act, 1898 - Sections 3 and 5

Reported in : AIR1982Delhi446; 22(1982)DLT23

Sangh as a State within Article 12 of the Constitution.(14) Reference by Mr. Charya to Section 3 of Lepers Act. 1898 is inapposite because there is no notification designating any Homes which are being run by the Sangh as

Pankaj Sinha Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Government of India, many State Governments and Union Territories have repealed 1 (2008) 17 SCC31111 the antiquated Lepers Act, 1898 and subsequent similar State Acts, providing for the segregation and medical treatment of pauper lepers suffering from infectious … by the statute in question and cannot be said to be unreasonable or arbitrary. Accordingly, we hold that Sections 16(l)(iv) and 17 (l)(b) of the Act are not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.30. Before parting

State of Maharashtra Vs. Sindhi Alias Raman, S/O Dalwai Alias Raghav

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1987(3)BomCR570; (1987)89BOMLR423

March 5, 1907).(5) Surgeon to the Coroner of Bombay. (G.R.J.D. No. 3246, dated January 10, 1910).(6) Inspector of Lepers. (G.R.G.D. No. 1798, dated March 7, 1914).26. The post of the Police Surgeon of Bombay is equivalent to … injuries: -(1) Lacerated wound on outer half of left eyebrow, 1' X 14 Bone fractured beneath.(2) Abraded bruise on cheek below one angle of left … find in a particular person, that person is able to recognise the nature and the quality of the act for which he is tried or if he is capable of knowing that what he was doing was … per the provisions of Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898.23. The reference came up for hearing before the Division Bench of this

Rao Bahadur A.T. Pannirselvam Vs. A. Veeriah Vandayar and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1931)60MLJ191

happens a year later, for the new elections. If he were discovered to be a deaf-mute or a leper, if he were discovered to have been an adjudicated insolvent, if he had any other of the disqualifications … of September the Subordinate Judge had lost jurisdiction to deal with the petition in consequence of a new Act, which had come into force, Act XI of 1930.' There is no dispute that at the time when … Mr. Veeriah Vandayar instituted his election petition. Among other things it repeals Section 13 of the Act of 1920, under which no salaried officer of