Advanced Search Results

J.S. Girl Rao Vs. Hind Kusht Niwaran Sangh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1870; Companies Act, 1956; ;Societies Registration Act, 1860; Constitution of India - Article 12; Parliament Act; Lepers Act, 1898 - Sections 3 and 5

Reported in : AIR1982Delhi446; 22(1982)DLT23

Sangh as a State within Article 12 of the Constitution.(14) Reference by Mr. Charya to Section 3 of Lepers Act. 1898 is inapposite because there is no notification designating any Homes which are being run by the Sangh as

Dhirendra Pandua Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Orissa Municipal Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 16, 16(1), 17, 17(1), 18, 19, 29 and 38; Lepers Act, 1898; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 136

Reported in : AIR2009SC163; 2008(56)BLJR3078; JT2008(10)SC347; (2008)8MLJ624(SC); 2008(12)SCALE612; 2008(5)LH(SC)3594; MANU/SC/4096/2008

Matched in: Citation AIR2009SC163; 2008(56)BLJR3078; JT2008(10)SC347; (2008)8MLJ624(SC); 2008(12)SCALE612; 2008(5)LH(SC)3594; MANU/SC/4096/2008

i.C. Chakravarty Vs. Khasi Hills District Council

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Autonomous District (Administration of Justice) Rules, 1953 - Rule 1

the property of the Mylliem State). 4. The Glanders and Farcy Act, 1899 (XIII of 1899). 5. The Lepers Act, 1898 (III of 1898). 6. The Assam Medical Act (I of 1916). 7. The Indian Post. Office Act, 1898 … for the purpose of such municipality, shall not be interfered with.........' On 15-11-1910 a notification was issued under Section 8 of the Bengal Municipal Act. 1884 extending the Act to the town of Shillong from 15-11-1910 denning … II and Sections 9, 51, 58, 59 (b), 59 (g), 65, 78, 129, 217 and 218 of the said Act shall not apply to the

State of Maharashtra Vs. Sindhi Alias Raman, S/O Dalwai Alias Raghav

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1987(3)BomCR570; (1987)89BOMLR423

March 5, 1907).(5) Surgeon to the Coroner of Bombay. (G.R.J.D. No. 3246, dated January 10, 1910).(6) Inspector of Lepers. (G.R.G.D. No. 1798, dated March 7, 1914).26. The post of the Police Surgeon of Bombay is equivalent to … find in a particular person, that person is able to recognise the nature and the quality of the act for which he is tried or if he is capable of knowing that what he was doing was … per the provisions of Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898.23. The reference came up for hearing before the Division Bench of this … and Ramesh assisted him in his duties. On that night at about 12.30 Babu had asked Ramesh to go and see whether the buffalo had

Emperor Vs. Chota Singh

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 3Ind.Cas.885

the difference between a Presidency Magistrate and District Magistrate or Magistrate of the first class. Thus, in the Lepers Act III of 1898, it was considered necessary in Section 2 (5) to define 'District Magistrate' as including a … of the terms are, undoubtedly, those to be gathered from the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sections 10 and 12 of the Code show that District Magistrates and Magistrates of the first class are appointed only in Districts

Pankaj Sinha Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Government of India, many State Governments and Union Territories have repealed 1 (2008) 17 SCC31111 the antiquated Lepers Act, 1898 and subsequent similar State Acts, providing for the segregation and medical treatment of pauper lepers suffering from infectious … so that the people can see them. shown The programmes shall be 12 the treatment in to to avail Hospitals should not decline treat such … by the statute in question and cannot be said to be unreasonable or arbitrary. Accordingly, we hold that Sections 16(l)(iv) and 17 (l)(b) of the Act are not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.30. Before parting

Rao Bahadur A.T. Pannirselvam Vs. A. Veeriah Vandayar and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1931)60MLJ191

happens a year later, for the new elections. If he were discovered to be a deaf-mute or a leper, if he were discovered to have been an adjudicated insolvent, if he had any other of the disqualifications … of September the Subordinate Judge had lost jurisdiction to deal with the petition in consequence of a new Act, which had come into force, Act XI of 1930.' There is no dispute that at the time when … Mr. Veeriah Vandayar instituted his election petition. Among other things it repeals Section 13 of the Act of 1920, under which no salaried officer of … prima facie retrospective. See Veerappa Chettiar v. Subramania Aiyar I.L.R. (1928) M. 123 : 55 M.L.J. 794 and Thaticherla Pichamma v. The Official Receiver of