Advanced Search Results

State of Karnataka Vs. Abdul Kareem Telgi @ Kareem Lala

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

22 of the Karnataka Prison Manual, 1978, reads “22. Under section 4 read with Section 10 of the Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963 (Karnataka thus:75. Act of 33 of 1963) there shall be for every Prison a Superintendent who shall manage … No.1 in our opinion, by this act, accused Nos.32 and 33 themselves have committed breach of security. Needless 64 to say that, in view of the strict Prison Rules, accused Nos.32 and 33 were required to ensure

Saheblal Vs. the Karnataka State Board of Wakfs and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Wakf Act, 1995 - Sections 25, 25(1) 63, 64 and 64(3); Wakf Rules; Muslim Law

Reported in : ILR2005KAR4846; 2006(5)KarLJ498

Therefore, the appointment of the petitioner as Mutawalli is without authority of law and void.;Writ Petition dismissed. - KARNATAKA PRISONS ACT, 1963 [K.A. No. 33/1963]. Karnataka Prisons Manual, Article 650: [S.R. Bannurmath & K. Ramanna, JJ] Parole - Question whether … submits that a Mutawalli could be removed only by holding an enquiry as provided under Sub-section (3) of Section 64 of the Wakf Act 1995 ('the Act' for short). According to him, as no enquiry was held, the

Navtej Singh Johar Vs. Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice Secr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

a century and 38[2004]. 3 S.C.R. 698 39 252 U.S. 416 (1920) 64 has cost their successors much sweat and blood to prove that they … to citizens. It did not apply only to 'white' people. It did not apply only to good people. Prisoners, murderers and even traitors were to be entitled to the freedoms that were declared. There were no exceptions … in Suresh Koushal (supra) had been guided by social morality leaning on majoritarian perception whereas the issue, in actuality, needed to be debated upon in the backdrop of constitutional morality. A contention was also advanced that the … 31-44 Decisions in Naz Foundation and Suresh Koushal………………..…………………………….. Other judicial pronouncements on Section 377 IPC ……………………….………………………….. The Constitution - an organic charter of progressive rights…………………………………

Remidex Pharmaceuticals Private Limited, Bangalore and Another Vs. Uni ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 227; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Drugs (Price Control) Order 1995; Cotton Textile (Control) Order, 1948

Reported in : AIR2000Kant288; ILR2000KAR2197; 2000(5)KarLJ189

Matched in: Court Karnataka

Rohit Shekhar Vs. Shri Narayan Dutt Tiwari and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

categorically submits that in view of law laid down in (2010) 7 SCC 263 Selvi vs. State of Karnataka, no sample could be obtained from the defendant no.1 per force without his express consent. 12. Mr. P.H. … the matron under the general or special powers of the Medical Officer. As per Section 37 of the Prisons Act, any prisoner wanting to be medically examined or appearing to be sick has to be reported before the … to the Family Reforms Act. In the judgment pronounced on 14th March, 1963 reported at [1963] 2 All E.R. 386, W. v. W. The question … In the judgment reported at Veronia School District v. Acton 515 U.S. 646 (1995), the Supreme Court of USA upheld the reasonableness and the constitutionality

Nina Rajan Pillai and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Section 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 409, 420, 302, 397, 467, 468; Extradition Act - Section 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 317(1), 321

such breach. Need to strengthen the system of Board of Visitors 77.1 Section 71 (23) of the Delhi Prisons Act, 2000, the current law for management of prisons in Delhi, provides the Government with the power to frame … of this Court in Kharak Singh v. The State of UP AIR 1963 SC 1295." (emphasis supplied) 57. Justice Krishna Iyer reiterated the essentiality of … a letter petition by a prisoner in Central Jail, Bangalore, issued several directions in Rama Murthy v. State of Karnataka (1997) 2 SCC 642 to improve the living conditions of inmates. The Court delineated nine major problems "which afflict … Bangalore, issued several directions in Rama Murthy v. State of Karnataka (1997) 2 SCC 642 to improve the living conditions of inmates. The Court delineated nine major

Geeta Keshav Shankar @ Geeta Mukesh Kharwa and Gauri Manga Kharwa @ Wa ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 25, 26, 27, 32, 60, 64 and 65; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 397; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154, 162, 164, 173, 294, 313 and 342

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR1163

unless the circumstances of the case compel it otherwise. Even in the case of Suryanarayana v. State of Karnataka : 2001CriLJ705 , where a child witness of four year old girl was the witness to the occurrence … it was not the original report but only a carbon copy thereof, and that too not certified. Under Section 64 of the Evidence Act document must be proved by primary evidence, that is to say, by producing the … a search made on the strength of any information obtained from the prisoner such fact is a guarantee that information supplied by the prisoner is

Asha Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the constitutional and statutory backdrop.33. In J.Jayalalithaa & Ors v. State of Karnataka & Ors.[8]., the Court held that fair trial is the main object … General of Prisons under Section 29 extracted above.” 28. Thereafter, the Court referred to Section 26 of the Prisons Act, 1894 and Sections 167 and 309 of the CrPC and adverted to the nature of power exercisable by … to the specific performance of the agreement. The relief was claimed under Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 but not under Section 21 of that Act. The High Court came to the conclusion that Section 28 … to give evidence and the evidence gets lost. x x x x 64. Be it noted, one cannot afford to treat the victim as an

Prakash Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1682 OF2005Prakash …..Appellant Versus State of Karnataka …Respondent JUDGMENT Madan B. Lokur, J.1. The substantial issues raised in this appeal, in which the conviction is … November, 1990 [2]. Criminal Appeal No.699 of 1999 [3]. [1976]. 1 SCR763[4]. 1963 Criminal Law Review pp. 479,480 [5]. Ibid. pp. 479,480 [6]. [1986]. 1 … that the provisions of section 342 should be fairly and faithfully observed.” 64. This was more clearly spelt out in Ajay Singh v. State of … Officer was to approach the Magistrate for necessary orders in accordance with section 5 of the Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920. In Mohd. Aman v. State of Rajasthan[22]. this Court referred to the possibility of the police

In Re: Mafatlal Industries Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 81(1), 111, 391, 391(1) and 394; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 14, Rule 2 - Order 20, Rule 4; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 6

Reported in : [1996]87CompCas705(Guj)

not for what may remotely or even logically follow from it.53. In Vijay Kumar Sharma v. State of Karnataka : [1990]1SCR614 , the apex court said :'Question on which there is no discussion or on which no … who was not under the restraint order and, secondly, the property was not attached. Hence, the consequence of Section 64 of the Civil Procedure Code would not follow. Obviously, this case, is of little assistance as far as … the Code of Civil Procedure. Rule 2A provides for detention in civil prison of a person who is found to be guilty of disobedience. The … on an application having been made under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act though the court ultimately found that even after excluding participation in respect