Advanced Search Results

State of M.P. Vs. Davendra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6 and 54A; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 93; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 18 and 19; Bombay Beggars Act, 1945 - Sections 4, 6, 9, 23(1) and 23(2); Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 55, 56 and 122; Bombay Public Security Measures Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Karnataka Police Act, 1963 - Sections 54, 55 and 96; Karnataka Habitual Offenders Act, 1961; Karnataka Prohibition of Beggary Act, 1975 - Sections 11(2) and 12(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 160, 161, 170(2), 171 and 439; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 55 and 118

Reported in : AIR2009SC3009; 2009CriLJ4130; JT2009(13)SC679; RLW2010(1)SC164; 2009(8)SCALE816:2009AIRSCW4840

--(a) who has been arrested in connection with an offence punishable under Section 96 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963, or in connection with an offence punishable of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963, or in connection with an … in respect of whom a direction or order under Section 55 or 56 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951, or under Sub-section (1) or (2) … High Court, Indore Bench, which gave certain directions to the State Government in the matter of identification of prisoners and methodology for investigation. The respondent No. 1 had filed an application for grant of bail in terms

Smt Shakunthala vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

-3-3. At the outset, it is apposite to advert to thestatutory scheme underlying parole. Section 56 of the Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963 (for short “the Act") vests the competent authority with discretionary power to release a prisoner on parole, inter

State of Karnataka vs Smt. Pavithra Gowda

Court : Karnataka

The enactments that are required to be noticed are the Prisons Act, 1894 (‘the 1894 Act’ for short); Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963; Karnataka Prisons Rules, 1974; and Karnataka Prisons and Correctional Services Manual, 2021. The issue in the lis revolves … TO ASSIST THE COURT) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 528 OF BNSS, 2023/READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH / SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED … CITY, REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, BENGALURU - 560 001. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL.SPP) AND: 1 . SMT. PAVITHRA

State of Karnataka Vs. Abdul Kareem Telgi @ Kareem Lala

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

22 of the Karnataka Prison Manual, 1978, reads “22. Under section 4 read with Section 10 of the Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963 (Karnataka thus:75. Act of 33 of 1963) there shall be for every Prison a Superintendent who shall manage … the relevant time. According to this witness, he came in acquaintance with accused No.1 while he was taking 56 treatment in the Prison Hospital. After taking some personal details, accused No.1 requested PW-51 to come to his

M.S. Syed Anwar and Etc. Vs. Commissioner of Police, Bangalore City an ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992CriLJ1606; 1991(2)KarLJ375

Matched in: Court Karnataka

High Court of Karnataka, Rep. by the Registrar General, Bangalore Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

after the completion of the parole period and he has no objection for issuing appropriate directions. 5. The Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963 (in short, 'the Prisons Act') and the Karnataka Prisons Rules, 1974 (in short, 'the Prisons Rules), governs the … a prisoner was released temporarily under sub-section (1) of Section 55, or on parole under sub-section (1) of Section 56, he shall surrender himself to the officer-in- charge of the prison from which he was released. (2) If

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

(8) SCC534; Bhanumati v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2010) 12 SCC1; K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Karnataka, (2011) 9 SCC1; State of Madhya Pradesh v. Rakesh Kohli, (2012) 6 SCC312; Namit Sharma v. Union of … Maneka, the Supreme Court considered a challenge to the provisions for solitary confinement under Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 which stipulated that a prisoner “under sentence of death” is to be kept in a cell apart … Pennsylvania Journal of International Law (2017), Vol. 38 Issue 2, at page 566 201 of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law. The article contains an excellent

Asha Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the constitutional and statutory backdrop.33. In J.Jayalalithaa & Ors v. State of Karnataka & Ors.[8]., the Court held that fair trial is the main object … General of Prisons under Section 29 extracted above.” 28. Thereafter, the Court referred to Section 26 of the Prisons Act, 1894 and Sections 167 and 309 of the CrPC and adverted to the nature of power exercisable by … to the specific performance of the agreement. The relief was claimed under Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 but not under Section 21 of that Act. The High Court came to the conclusion that Section 28 … Act 1894 | | |0510.11 |u/s 420/468/471 IPC | |19 |Muffasil PS; 56/07; |147/149/341/342/323/307/337 IPC | | |20.03.07 | | |20 |Andar PS; 10/98; 29.01.98|147/148/149/341/506

The State of Maharashtra and Others Vs. Yuvraj and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Criminal

720 Gupta @ Sethi Gupta V/s. State of Bihar (2013) 12 SCC 383), (2) Venkatesha V/s. State of Karnataka, (3) Sudevanand V/s. State through CBI (2012 AIR (SCW) 953), (4) Bangaru Laxman V/s. State [Through CBI] and … (P.W.1) was original accused no.3, who was arrested on 16th March, 2012 and he was lodged in District Prison, Jalgaon. As per the prosecution case, on 21st June, 2012, the Approver wrote a letter to the Superintendent, … on 21/06/2012 (Ex.52) mentioning therein that, he was repenting of his sinful act and desirous to disclose entire incident. He requested Investigating Officer to produce … said case, have been therefore forwarded to this Court for confirmation under section 366 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The accused no.1-Yuvraj Kashinath Sabale and … G.S.Bakshi V/s. State [Delhi Administration] (AIR 1979 SC 569), (12) Madan Mohan Lal V/s. State of Punjab

Navtej Singh Johar Vs. Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice Secr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of concern for this Court in Jagmohan Singh v. State of U.P.21 56. The applicant, after citing the case of State of Gujarat v. Mirzapur … to citizens. It did not apply only to 'white' people. It did not apply only to good people. Prisoners, murderers and even traitors were to be entitled to the freedoms that were declared. There were no exceptions … in Suresh Koushal (supra) had been guided by social morality leaning on majoritarian perception whereas the issue, in actuality, needed to be debated upon in the backdrop of constitutional morality. A contention was also advanced that the … 31-44 Decisions in Naz Foundation and Suresh Koushal………………..…………………………….. Other judicial pronouncements on Section 377 IPC ……………………….………………………….. The Constitution - an organic charter of progressive rights…………………………………