Advanced Search Results

State of M.P. Vs. Davendra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6 and 54A; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 93; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 18 and 19; Bombay Beggars Act, 1945 - Sections 4, 6, 9, 23(1) and 23(2); Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 55, 56 and 122; Bombay Public Security Measures Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Karnataka Police Act, 1963 - Sections 54, 55 and 96; Karnataka Habitual Offenders Act, 1961; Karnataka Prohibition of Beggary Act, 1975 - Sections 11(2) and 12(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 160, 161, 170(2), 171 and 439; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 55 and 118

Reported in : AIR2009SC3009; 2009CriLJ4130; JT2009(13)SC679; RLW2010(1)SC164; 2009(8)SCALE816:2009AIRSCW4840

--(a) who has been arrested in connection with an offence punishable under Section 96 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963, or in connection with an offence punishable of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963, or in connection with an … Taking of measurements of photographs of non-convicted persons. - An person --(a) who has been arrested --(i) under Section 55 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, or under Section 4 of the Bombay Beggars Act, 1945;(ii) in … certain directions to the State Government in the matter of identification of prisoners and methodology for investigation. The respondent No. 1 had filed an application

Radhamma vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Regulation 635 of the Karnataka Prisoners andCorrections Service Manual, 2021 reads as under: ""i. Section 55 of the Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963 and Rule 191 of the Karnataka Prisons Rules, 1974 confers on State Government or any authority empowered by

E.S. Rajan Vs. R. Mohan

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 55; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16

Reported in : ILR1995KAR492; 1994(5)KarLJ357

Matched in: Court Karnataka

M.S. Syed Anwar and Etc. Vs. Commissioner of Police, Bangalore City an ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992CriLJ1606; 1991(2)KarLJ375

Matched in: Court Karnataka

State of Karnataka Vs. Abdul Kareem Telgi @ Kareem Lala

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

22 of the Karnataka Prison Manual, 1978, reads “22. Under section 4 read with Section 10 of the Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963 (Karnataka thus:75. Act of 33 of 1963) there shall be for every Prison a Superintendent who shall manage … proper authorization or permission was illegal, yet, in our opinion, the illegality in conducting the search does not 55 affect the evidentiary value of the articles recovered pursuant to the search made by the investigating agency. Therefore,

State of Karnataka vs Smt. Pavithra Gowda

Court : Karnataka

The enactments that are required to be noticed are the Prisons Act, 1894 (‘the 1894 Act’ for short); Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963; Karnataka Prisons Rules, 1974; and Karnataka Prisons and Correctional Services Manual, 2021. The issue in the lis revolves … - 570 022. 3 . LAKSHMAN M., S/O MARIYAPPA C., AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, NO.1354, 9TH MAIN, R.P.C. LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 040. ... … TO ASSIST THE COURT) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 528 OF BNSS, 2023/READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH / SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED

Ajeesh vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … accused. Same principles have been stated inconnected cases 55 Baiju Kumar Soni and another v. State of

Suo- Motu, vs Jithesh,

Court : Kerala

S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … accused. Same principles have been stated inconnected cases 55 Baiju Kumar Soni and another v. State of

P.K.Vimaladevi vs K.Haridas

Court : Kerala

S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … accused. Same principles have been stated inconnected cases 55 Baiju Kumar Soni and another v. State of

State of Kerala vs K.Haridas

Court : Kerala

S/O. JOY THOMAS, NALPATHEKKAR KOTTACKAL VEEDU, NELLUTHIKKERI VILLAGE, SOMARPETTA TALUK, KUDAKU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.connected cases 116 K. HARIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, SIVAM VEEDU, TC VI/1100(4), … their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger … that after arresting the accused, their finger impressions were taken as required under the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act, 1963 and Rules thereunder. Finger impressions were sent to the Finger Print Bureau for comparison. On 06.01.2013, the accused … We may now refer to the Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,connected cases 107 1963 (in short, “Act of 1963”). Section 3 speaks about taking measurements, etc. of convicted persons. No doubt, this Act applies to persons apprehended at … accused. Same principles have been stated inconnected cases 55 Baiju Kumar Soni and another v. State of